Explain a debt refusal with facts about the item

Reasons are the auditable explanation of a pure decision, so one that
describes the architecture rots the moment the architecture moves. The
operational refusal asserted that manual interventions were recorded by no
event type: true when written, false the day OperatorInterventionRecorded
landed, and still printed under every refusal after that.

It now reports the counts and the thresholds they missed. Why a count is
zero is not this function's business, since no intervention happening, none
being recorded, and none being migrated all read the same from here.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CVbaKucEYBjMqVeUgJUsc1

internal/operations/debt_test.go

@@ -62,7 +62,17 @@ func TestDebtRefusalNamesTheMissingEvidence(t *testing.T) {
 		t.Fatalf("want a refusal with reasons, got %+v", check)
 	}
 	joined := strings.Join(check.Reasons, " ")
-	if !strings.Contains(joined, "manual interventions are not recorded") {
-		t.Fatalf("the refusal must say the intervention count is structurally zero: %v", check.Reasons)
+	// Every reason is a fact about this item. The old text asserted that no
+	// event type recorded manual interventions, which stopped being true the
+	// day one did, leaving a correct decision explained by a lie.
+	for _, want := range []string{"1 occurrences across 1 tasks", "0 recorded, needs 1"} {
+		if !strings.Contains(joined, want) {
+			t.Fatalf("the refusal does not state %q: %v", want, check.Reasons)
+		}
+	}
+	for _, forbidden := range []string{"event type", "every current log"} {
+		if strings.Contains(joined, forbidden) {
+			t.Fatalf("a reason describes the architecture instead of the item: %v", check.Reasons)
+		}
 	}
 }