Explain a debt refusal with facts about the item

Reasons are the auditable explanation of a pure decision, so one that
describes the architecture rots the moment the architecture moves. The
operational refusal asserted that manual interventions were recorded by no
event type: true when written, false the day OperatorInterventionRecorded
landed, and still printed under every refusal after that.

It now reports the counts and the thresholds they missed. Why a count is
zero is not this function's business, since no intervention happening, none
being recorded, and none being migrated all read the same from here.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CVbaKucEYBjMqVeUgJUsc1

cmd/ledgerrun/main.go

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+// Runs the debt projection over a captured event log and prints one row per
+// item, so two builds can be compared on identical input. The point of the
+// comparison is the signature fix: cross-task incidents must collapse into one
+// item while genuinely different failures stay separate.
+package main
+
+import (
+	"encoding/json"
+	"fmt"
+	"os"
+	"sort"
+
+	"orchestra/internal/domain"
+	"orchestra/internal/operations"
+	"orchestra/internal/store"
+)
+
+func main() {
+	b, err := os.ReadFile(os.Args[1])
+	if err != nil {
+		panic(err)
+	}
+	var events []domain.Event
+	if err := json.Unmarshal(b, &events); err != nil {
+		panic(err)
+	}
+	ledger := store.ProjectDebt(events)
+	eligible := map[string]operations.DebtCandidate{}
+	for _, c := range operations.EligibleDebt(ledger) {
+		eligible[c.Item.ID] = c
+	}
+	rows := make([]map[string]any, 0, len(ledger.Items))
+	for _, item := range ledger.Items {
+		tasks := map[string]bool{}
+		intensity := 0
+		for _, o := range item.Observations {
+			if o.TaskID != "" {
+				tasks[o.TaskID] = true
+			}
+			intensity += o.Repeats
+		}
+		row := map[string]any{
+			"signature": item.ID, "class": string(item.Class),
+			"recurrence": len(item.Observations), "intensity": intensity,
+			"tasks": len(tasks), "eligible": false, "reasons": []string{},
+		}
+		check := operations.CheckDebtEligibility(item)
+		row["eligible"] = check.Eligible
+		row["reasons"] = check.Reasons
+		_ = eligible
+		rows = append(rows, row)
+	}
+	sort.Slice(rows, func(i, j int) bool { return rows[i]["signature"].(string) < rows[j]["signature"].(string) })
+	out, _ := json.MarshalIndent(map[string]any{"items": rows, "gaps": ledger.Gaps}, "", " ")
+	fmt.Println(string(out))
+}

internal/operations/debt.go

@@ -43,9 +43,17 @@ func CheckDebtEligibility(item domain.DebtItem) DebtCheck {
 		if len(why) > 0 {
 			return DebtCheck{true, why}
 		}
+		// Reasons state facts about this item and nothing about the
+		// architecture around it. The second line here used to say manual
+		// interventions were recorded by no event type, which was true when it
+		// was written and false the moment OperatorInterventionRecorded
+		// landed. A decision that is right for a reason that has become a lie
+		// cannot be audited, and why a count is zero is not this function's
+		// business: no intervention happened, none was recorded, or none was
+		// migrated all read the same from here.
 		return DebtCheck{false, []string{
-			fmt.Sprintf("needs 3 occurrences across 2 tasks, or 1 manual intervention; has %d across %d tasks with %d interventions", recurrence, tasks, manual),
+			fmt.Sprintf("breadth threshold not met: %d occurrences across %d tasks, needs 3 across 2", recurrence, tasks),
-			"manual interventions are not recorded by any event type, so that count reads 0 on every current log",
+			fmt.Sprintf("manual intervention threshold not met: %d recorded, needs 1", manual),
 		}}
 	case domain.DebtStructural:
 		if recurrence >= 3 {

internal/operations/debt_test.go

@@ -62,7 +62,17 @@ func TestDebtRefusalNamesTheMissingEvidence(t *testing.T) {
 		t.Fatalf("want a refusal with reasons, got %+v", check)
 	}
 	joined := strings.Join(check.Reasons, " ")
-	if !strings.Contains(joined, "manual interventions are not recorded") {
+	// Every reason is a fact about this item. The old text asserted that no
-		t.Fatalf("the refusal must say the intervention count is structurally zero: %v", check.Reasons)
+	// event type recorded manual interventions, which stopped being true the
+	// day one did, leaving a correct decision explained by a lie.
+	for _, want := range []string{"1 occurrences across 1 tasks", "0 recorded, needs 1"} {
+		if !strings.Contains(joined, want) {
+			t.Fatalf("the refusal does not state %q: %v", want, check.Reasons)
+		}
+	}
+	for _, forbidden := range []string{"event type", "every current log"} {
+		if strings.Contains(joined, forbidden) {
+			t.Fatalf("a reason describes the architecture instead of the item: %v", check.Reasons)
+		}
 	}
 }