# Burn-in: live conformance, not more architecture Written 2026-08-26. The workflow is feature-complete enough to exercise. What remains is empirical: run the same real task shape through each harness and classify what breaks. Isolated tests are insufficient by design here, and only the live owner path establishes conformance. Do not add workflow features while this is running. Findings decide the next implementation work. ## Deployment state, probed 2026-08-26 Burn-in cannot start yet. Two blockers, one config gap. | Fact | Evidence | |---|---| | The API is up on homesrv | `GET 192.168.1.104:9145/readyz` → `ready:true`, store/router/gitea/jsonl all ready | | The workpc worker is up and serving two harnesses | `orchestra-worker` pid 741, restarted 2026-08-26 11:39, no errors since | | **The deployed worker predates every v3 unit** | `go version -m /usr/local/bin/orchestra-worker` → `vcs.revision=97a9c65`, `vcs.time=2026-07-30` | | **The v3 work is uncommitted** | Both sessions' units are working-tree changes on `webui-and-audit-reconciliation` | | Codex has no harness entry at all | `/etc/orchestra/harnesses.json` declares only `workpc-claude` (tmux) and `workpc-opencode` (herdr) | | No homesrv worker is running | Only the API container runs there; the three `homesrv-*` herdrs have no worker | Consequences: 1. **Commit, then rebuild and redeploy both artifacts.** The API container (`docker compose -f compose.yaml -f compose.live.yaml up -d --build` in `/mnt/server/home/kami/docker-apps/orchestra-web-ui`) and the worker binary (staged at `workpc:~/orchestra-deploy/orchestra-worker`, then installed to `/usr/local/bin`, then `systemctl restart orchestra-worker`). Confirm the API revision at `GET /v1/admin/diagnostics` and the worker's at `go version -m`. Neither currently has phases, review, submission, the agent surface, or the reconcile escalation. 2. **Codex cannot be burned in until it has a harnesses.json entry.** Three of four target harnesses are unreachable today: codex is unconfigured, and both `homesrv-claude`/`homesrv-codex`/`homesrv-opencode` have no worker. 3. The registry is misleading about herdr transports. No entry in the live `config.jsonc` sets `backend` or `address`, so all six resolve to `:9245` (`registry.defaultHerdrPort`), and both ports are closed. The workpc worker actually uses a tmux socket and a unix socket (`/home/kami/.config/herdr/herdr.sock`). Federated reachability defers to worker heartbeat, so this does not block leasing, but a TCP probe of 9245 is not evidence about any of these harnesses. Do not diagnose from it. ## Evidence to record per run One row per run. The launch instruction is now dumped to `/.orchestra/launch.md` (`herdr.LaunchContextFile`) at every launch, local and federated, so the context is auditable without reading pane scrollback. ``` harness (claude | codex | opencode) task id lease epoch (every epoch, if the task rotates) session ids (pane ids per epoch) human decision ids launch context (sha256 of .orchestra/launch.md, per launch) handoff ref git sha (at every boundary: launch, each handoff, review, submit, merge) review ref submission ref pr id completion receipt ``` ## The five flows 1. **Boring success.** `task → research → plan → implement → review → pr → merge`. 2. **Mid-session correction.** Agent is doing A, the human says B, the next verified boundary delivers B, and A becomes history rather than a competing instruction. 3. **Rotation.** Agent A hands off, agent B resumes. Switch harnesses across the boundary if both are up. 4. **Human rejection.** Submit sha A, comment on the pull request, task reopens, fix at sha B, a fresh review, the same pull request, merge. 5. **Failure path.** Human source goes down, the reconcile streak escalates, the session hands off, the successor lease is refused, the source recovers, and a corrected successor starts. ## What to inspect by hand For every launch, read `.orchestra/launch.md` and ask only: ``` does this agent know - what the task actually wants? - what was most recently decided? - what phase it is in? - what earlier material is merely historical? - what to do next? ``` Then compare that against what the model did. ## Classify before fixing Every failure gets exactly one label before any code is written: ``` authority bug the wrong thing outranked the right thing context-selection bug the renderer showed or hid the wrong material lifecycle bug state, lease, phase or event handling is wrong adapter/harness bug the pane, occupancy, boundary or prompt path is wrong model-following failure the context was right and the model ignored it operator-policy gap credentials, deployment or configuration ``` This matters because the cheap response to every failure is another prompt rule, and prompt rules accumulated to compensate for lifecycle or adapter bugs are how the enforcement boundary rots. A model-following failure is the only class a prompt change should ever answer. ## Pane credential cleanup (operator, in parallel) The agent pane inherits the worker's environment. On workpc the worker is `orchestra-worker.service`, `User=kami`, `EnvironmentFile=/etc/orchestra/worker.env` (mode 0600, root-owned, deliberately unreadable here). Remove from that file, and from anything else the pane inherits: ``` gitea mutation token vikunja mutation credentials orchestra operator / system token ``` Retain only `ORCHESTRA_AGENT_TOKEN` and credentials a specific task genuinely needs. If an agent needs a forge operation, it asks Orchestra to perform it. Then verify from inside a real pane: ```bash git push # must fail unless Orchestra supplied the auth curl .../v1/tasks//submission # must be 403 for the agent surface tea pr create # must have no usable mutation credential ``` Note what is *not* enforced by code: nothing in this repo scrubs the pane environment, and a fake `git` earlier in `$PATH` is not enforcement because `/usr/bin/git` bypasses it. Credential isolation is the enforcement. Confinement of network, filesystem and destructive commands belongs to whatever launches the process (herdr, a container, systemd, bubblewrap), not to Orchestra, which supplies identity and policy inputs. ## Exit criterion Roughly 10 to 20 real tasks, with the five flows covered on each harness that is actually up. Then read the classified failures and decide the next implementation unit from them.