Score the destination apart from the intent (V-659)

The fixture measured the first half of a route and stopped. V-655 split a
routing decision in two, and the second half arrived with no fixture, so
Decision.Source had no accuracy number at all.

want_source is a pointer because the destination has three states and a
bare string has two. Absent is every intent but query, which never reaches
queryWalk. Present and empty is the SourceUnknown contract: name nothing
and let the daemon walk the chain, which is right whenever two destinations
can both answer and the utterance does not choose. Present and named is a
destination the route must produce.

A destination miss does not fail the case. It goes in SourceReason, never
in Reasons, so Accuracy and IntentAccuracy stay the numbers they were and
69/91 still means what it meant. SourceAccuracy is the second number, over
the labelled cases only, because a percentage of the whole fixture would be
a percentage of turns that never ask a query source.

A clarified or mis-routed case still counts in the denominator. It named no
destination and that is a miss, not a case to skip, or the denominator drops
every turn the route already lost.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013ptwopxyo3Z2kwFckHkLvN
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-08 18:00:37 +04:00
parent 7203cd56fd
commit 2597a7b34a
+87 -20
View File
@@ -36,17 +36,27 @@ var fixtureJSON []byte
//
// Intent is empty exactly when WantClarify is set: the contract there is that
// the router refuses instead of guessing.
//
// WantSource is a pointer because the destination has three states and a bare
// string only has two (V-659). Absent means the case does not score a
// destination at all, which is every intent but query: a fact, a reminder, a
// note, an act, a chat or a system turn never reaches queryWalk. Present and
// empty is the SourceUnknown contract — the decider must name nothing and let
// the daemon walk the whole chain, which is the right answer whenever two
// destinations can both answer and the utterance does not choose. Present and
// named is a destination the route must produce.
type Case struct {
ID string `json:"id"`
Utterance string `json:"utterance"`
Lang string `json:"lang"`
Intent router.Intent `json:"intent"`
WantTime bool `json:"want_time"`
WantFn bool `json:"want_fn"`
WantFactKey string `json:"want_fact_key"`
WantClarify bool `json:"want_clarify"`
Tags []string `json:"tags"`
Note string `json:"note"`
ID string `json:"id"`
Utterance string `json:"utterance"`
Lang string `json:"lang"`
Intent router.Intent `json:"intent"`
WantTime bool `json:"want_time"`
WantFn bool `json:"want_fn"`
WantFactKey string `json:"want_fact_key"`
WantClarify bool `json:"want_clarify"`
WantSource *router.Source `json:"want_source,omitempty"`
Tags []string `json:"tags"`
Note string `json:"note"`
}
// Fixture — the versioned envelope, same shape as
@@ -118,6 +128,11 @@ type Outcome struct {
// (a slot gap is a parser fix; a wrong intent is a router fix).
IntentOK bool
Reasons []string
// SourceReason is set when the case labelled a destination and the route
// named a different one. It is kept out of Reasons on purpose: the
// destination is the second half of a route and it is scored separately,
// so a wrong destination must not move the intent number (V-659).
SourceReason string
}
// Report — the aggregate. Accuracy is the headline; the rest exists so a
@@ -139,7 +154,15 @@ type Report struct {
// (reminder grammar → applyAction's time parser). Not a miss, but not a
// full router-level win either; tracked so the two aren't conflated.
SlotsDeferred int
Outcomes []Outcome
// SourceTotal counts the cases carrying a want_source, and SourceHit the
// ones whose route named it. Reported apart from Passed because intent and
// destination are two decisions, and one number hides which one moved.
SourceTotal int
SourceHit int
// SourceConfusion counts want→got destination pairs. "" reads as the
// SourceUnknown floor on either side.
SourceConfusion map[string]int
Outcomes []Outcome
// Confusion counts want→got intent pairs, decided cases only.
Confusion map[string]int
// ByTag accuracy for the fixture's tags ("hard", "homelab", …).
@@ -172,6 +195,17 @@ func (r Report) IntentAccuracy() float64 {
return float64(r.IntentHit) / float64(r.Total)
}
// SourceAccuracy — fraction of the labelled cases whose route named the right
// destination. Denominator is SourceTotal and not Total, because most of the
// fixture never reaches a query source and scoring those would report a
// percentage of nothing.
func (r Report) SourceAccuracy() float64 {
if r.SourceTotal == 0 {
return 0
}
return float64(r.SourceHit) / float64(r.SourceTotal)
}
// Score runs every case through r and aggregates. It never fails the run on a
// route error — an erroring case scores as a miss and is counted in Errors,
// because "the model was down" and "the model was wrong" are different numbers
@@ -186,11 +220,12 @@ func Score(ctx context.Context, name string, r Router, f Fixture) (Report, error
return Report{}, err
}
rep := Report{
Name: name,
Total: len(f.Cases),
Confusion: map[string]int{},
ByTag: map[string]TagStat{},
ByLang: map[string]TagStat{},
Name: name,
Total: len(f.Cases),
Confusion: map[string]int{},
SourceConfusion: map[string]int{},
ByTag: map[string]TagStat{},
ByLang: map[string]TagStat{},
}
lat := make([]time.Duration, 0, len(f.Cases))
@@ -242,6 +277,23 @@ func Score(ctx context.Context, name string, r Router, f Fixture) (Report, error
}
}
// The destination is scored outside the switch and outside Pass. A case
// that clarified or landed the wrong intent named no destination, and
// that is a real miss rather than a case to skip — otherwise the
// denominator quietly drops every turn the route already lost. Only a
// route error is skipped, because "the model was down" is the Errors
// number and not a destination result.
if c.WantSource != nil && err == nil {
rep.SourceTotal++
switch {
case d.Source == *c.WantSource:
rep.SourceHit++
default:
rep.SourceConfusion[string(*c.WantSource)+"→"+string(d.Source)]++
o.SourceReason = fmt.Sprintf("source %q, want %q", d.Source, *c.WantSource)
}
}
o.Pass = len(o.Reasons) == 0
if o.Pass {
rep.Passed++
@@ -298,25 +350,40 @@ func (r Report) String() string {
r.Name, r.Passed, r.Total, 100*r.Accuracy(), 100*r.IntentAccuracy())
fmt.Fprintf(&b, " clarify: %d false (asked, shouldn't) / %d missed (guessed, shouldn't) | errors: %d | slots deferred to daemon: %d\n",
r.FalseClarify, r.MissedClarify, r.Errors, r.SlotsDeferred)
if r.SourceTotal > 0 {
fmt.Fprintf(&b, " destination: %d/%d labelled cases (%.1f%%)\n",
r.SourceHit, r.SourceTotal, 100*r.SourceAccuracy())
}
fmt.Fprintf(&b, " latency: p50 %s p95 %s max %s\n", r.P50, r.P95, r.Max)
fmt.Fprintf(&b, " by lang: %s\n", renderStats(r.ByLang))
fmt.Fprintf(&b, " by tag: %s\n", renderStats(r.ByTag))
if len(r.Confusion) > 0 {
fmt.Fprintf(&b, " confusion: %s\n", renderCounts(r.Confusion))
}
if len(r.SourceConfusion) > 0 {
fmt.Fprintf(&b, " destination confusion: %s\n", renderCounts(r.SourceConfusion))
}
return b.String()
}
// Failures — the per-case detail, sorted by ID so two runs diff cleanly.
// Failures — the per-case detail, sorted by ID so two runs diff cleanly. A case
// that landed its intent and missed its destination is listed too, marked, so
// the half that moved is readable without diffing two percentages.
func (r Report) Failures() string {
var b strings.Builder
out := append([]Outcome(nil), r.Outcomes...)
sort.Slice(out, func(i, j int) bool { return out[i].Case.ID < out[j].Case.ID })
for _, o := range out {
if o.Pass {
continue
switch {
case !o.Pass:
reasons := o.Reasons
if o.SourceReason != "" {
reasons = append(append([]string(nil), reasons...), o.SourceReason)
}
fmt.Fprintf(&b, " %s %q: %s\n", o.Case.ID, o.Case.Utterance, strings.Join(reasons, "; "))
case o.SourceReason != "":
fmt.Fprintf(&b, " %s %q: route ok, %s\n", o.Case.ID, o.Case.Utterance, o.SourceReason)
}
fmt.Fprintf(&b, " %s %q: %s\n", o.Case.ID, o.Case.Utterance, strings.Join(o.Reasons, "; "))
}
return b.String()
}