an unrecognized act says so and lists nothing (V-556)

Reciting the allowlist answered a question he did not ask. She says the command
is not one she knows, once, and parks nothing.
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-05 23:43:22 +04:00
parent d988154063
commit 5bd1406c7a
3 changed files with 52 additions and 121 deletions
+3 -12
View File
@@ -156,19 +156,10 @@ func (h *reactiveHandler) askClarify(ctx context.Context, dec router.Decision) (
if !ok {
return "", false
}
// An act is the one gap that may have nothing on the other end. Ask only
// when she has something to run, and say what it is (Vikunja #556).
// An act she could not resolve is a refusal, not a question (Vikunja #556).
if slot == dialogue.SlotFn {
var allow []string
if h.matcher != nil {
allow = h.matcher.Allowlist()
}
reply, ask := fnClarify(allow, 1)
if !ask {
log.Printf("voice: clarify — act with %d allowlisted fns; naming the gap instead of asking", len(allow))
return reply, reply != ""
}
question = reply
log.Printf("voice: clarify — act %q matched no capability; saying so instead of asking", dec.Utterance)
return actNotRecognized, true
}
h.clarifyStore.Put(dialogueIDOf(ctx), &dialogue.PendingQuestion{
Intent: dialogue.Intent(dec.Intent),
+37 -79
View File
@@ -231,10 +231,10 @@ func TestClarifyRestatedAnswerWins(t *testing.T) {
}
}
// TestClarifiedActOffAllowlistIsStillRefused — clarification fills in an
// argument, it never grants authority. One tool is enabled so there is a
// question to park at all (Vikunja #556); the answer names something else.
func TestClarifiedActOffAllowlistIsStillRefused(t *testing.T) {
// TestActOffAllowlistIsStillRefused — naming a capability is not being granted
// one. Since Vikunja #556 an unresolved act no longer parks a question, so this
// goes through applyAction, which is the only way an act runs.
func TestActOffAllowlistIsStillRefused(t *testing.T) {
ctx := context.Background()
h, st, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)
marker := filepath.Join(t.TempDir(), "not-allowed-ran")
@@ -242,13 +242,11 @@ func TestClarifiedActOffAllowlistIsStillRefused(t *testing.T) {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if _, asked := h.askClarify(ctx, clarifyDec(router.IntentAct, router.Slots{Text: "сделай это"}, "сделай это")); !asked {
t.Fatal("an act with no fn should be asked about")
}
reply, handled := h.resolveClarifyAnswer(ctx, "rm "+marker)
if !handled {
t.Fatal("the answer should be consumed")
}
reply := h.applyAction(ctx, router.Decision{
Utterance: "rm " + marker,
Intent: router.IntentAct,
Slots: router.Slots{Fn: "rm " + marker, HasFn: true},
})
if strings.Contains(reply, "готово") {
t.Fatalf("an act that is not on the allowlist must not report success: %q", reply)
}
@@ -256,13 +254,12 @@ func TestClarifiedActOffAllowlistIsStillRefused(t *testing.T) {
t.Fatalf("a clarified act off the allowlist ran anyway: %v", err)
}
if tools, err := st.ListTools(ctx, "enabled"); err != nil || len(tools) != 1 {
t.Fatalf("clarify must not enable a tool: tools=%+v err=%v", tools, err)
t.Fatalf("an act must not enable a tool: tools=%+v err=%v", tools, err)
}
}
// TestClarifiedDestructiveActStillNeedsConfirm — the confirm gate survives the
// clarify path.
func TestClarifiedDestructiveActStillNeedsConfirm(t *testing.T) {
// TestDestructiveActStillNeedsConfirm — the confirm gate stands on the act path.
func TestDestructiveActStillNeedsConfirm(t *testing.T) {
ctx := context.Background()
h, st, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)
marker := filepath.Join(t.TempDir(), "destructive-ran")
@@ -270,18 +267,16 @@ func TestClarifiedDestructiveActStillNeedsConfirm(t *testing.T) {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if _, asked := h.askClarify(ctx, clarifyDec(router.IntentAct, router.Slots{Text: "сделай это"}, "сделай это")); !asked {
t.Fatal("expected a question")
}
reply, handled := h.resolveClarifyAnswer(ctx, "delete_backups")
if !handled {
t.Fatal("the answer should be consumed")
}
reply := h.applyAction(ctx, router.Decision{
Utterance: "delete_backups",
Intent: router.IntentAct,
Slots: router.Slots{Fn: "delete_backups", HasFn: true},
})
if !strings.Contains(reply, "да") || h.pending == nil {
t.Fatalf("a clarified destructive act must still park a confirm: reply=%q pending=%+v", reply, h.pending)
t.Fatalf("a destructive act must park a confirm: reply=%q pending=%+v", reply, h.pending)
}
if _, err := os.Stat(marker); !os.IsNotExist(err) {
t.Fatalf("a clarified destructive act ran before confirmation: %v", err)
t.Fatalf("a destructive act ran before confirmation: %v", err)
}
}
@@ -575,14 +570,12 @@ func TestARestartExpiresTheParkedQuestion(t *testing.T) {
// line. None of them was ever an answer.
func TestClarifyStepsAsideForItsOwnRequest(t *testing.T) {
ctx := context.Background()
h, st, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)
// One enabled tool, so there is a question to park (Vikunja #556).
if err := st.EnableTool(ctx, "uptime", []string{"true"}, false, "test", h.now()); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
h, _, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)
if _, asked := h.askClarify(ctx, clarifyDec(router.IntentAct, router.Slots{Text: "выключи свет в спальне"}, "выключи свет в спальне")); !asked {
t.Fatal("an act with no fn should be asked about")
// A reminder, not the act this bug was found on: since Vikunja #556 an act
// no longer parks anything, so it can no longer eat the turn after it.
if _, asked := h.askClarify(ctx, clarifyDec(router.IntentReminder, router.Slots{Text: "напомни позвонить маме"}, "напомни позвонить маме")); !asked {
t.Fatal("a reminder with no time should be asked about")
}
if reply, handled := h.resolveClarifyAnswer(ctx, "кто изобрёл телефон"); handled {
t.Fatalf("a world question must route as itself, got %q", reply)
@@ -629,62 +622,27 @@ func TestClarifyQuestionShapedAnswerThatFillsTheGapStillLands(t *testing.T) {
}
}
// TestActWithNothingOnTheOtherEndNamesTheGap — Vikunja #556. With no tool
// enabled, "Что сделать?" has no answer he could give, so she says so and parks
// nothing rather than spending three turns on a request she cannot fulfil.
func TestActWithNothingOnTheOtherEndNamesTheGap(t *testing.T) {
// TestUnresolvedActSaysItDoesNotKnowTheCommand — Vikunja #556. "Что сделать?"
// has no answer he can give, so an act that matched no capability is refused in
// one line and nothing is parked. It does not recite what she can do instead.
func TestUnresolvedActSaysItDoesNotKnowTheCommand(t *testing.T) {
ctx := context.Background()
h, _, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)
h, st, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)
// Enabled tools change nothing here: this act matched none of them.
if err := st.EnableTool(ctx, "uptime", []string{"true"}, false, "test", h.now()); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
reply, spoken := h.askClarify(ctx, clarifyDec(router.IntentAct, router.Slots{Text: "выключи свет"}, "выключи свет"))
if !spoken || reply == "" {
t.Fatal("an act with nothing on the other end must still say something")
if !spoken || reply != actNotRecognized {
t.Fatalf("reply = %q spoken=%v, want %q", reply, spoken, actNotRecognized)
}
if strings.Contains(reply, "?") {
t.Errorf("reply = %q, want a statement, not a question", reply)
if strings.Contains(reply, "uptime") {
t.Errorf("reply = %q, want no list of capabilities he did not ask about", reply)
}
if h.clarifyStore.Get(voiceDialogueID, h.now()) != nil {
t.Error("nothing to ask about, so nothing may be parked")
}
}
// TestActClarifyNamesWhatSheCanDo — the other half. With tools enabled the
// question stands, and it names them so it is answerable.
func TestActClarifyNamesWhatSheCanDo(t *testing.T) {
ctx := context.Background()
h, st, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)
for _, name := range []string{"uptime", "disk"} {
if err := st.EnableTool(ctx, name, []string{"true"}, false, "test", h.now()); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
}
reply, asked := h.askClarify(ctx, clarifyDec(router.IntentAct, router.Slots{Text: "сделай это"}, "сделай это"))
if !asked {
t.Fatal("with tools enabled she should still ask")
}
for _, want := range []string{"uptime", "disk"} {
if !strings.Contains(reply, want) {
t.Errorf("reply = %q, want it to name %q", reply, want)
}
}
if h.clarifyStore.Get(voiceDialogueID, h.now()) == nil {
t.Error("the request must be parked so the answer can land")
}
}
// TestFnClarifyCapsTheListItRecites — a spoken sentence cannot carry twelve
// names, which is how many this deployment enables.
func TestFnClarifyCapsTheListItRecites(t *testing.T) {
allow := []string{"a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h"}
reply, ask := fnClarify(allow, 1)
if !ask {
t.Fatal("a non-empty allowlist is still a question")
}
if strings.Contains(reply, "g") || strings.Contains(reply, "h") {
t.Errorf("reply = %q, want the list capped at %d", reply, namedActsCap)
}
if !strings.Contains(reply, "…") {
t.Errorf("reply = %q, want it to admit the list was cut", reply)
}
}
+12 -30
View File
@@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
package main
import (
"strings"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/dialogue"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/router"
)
@@ -42,6 +40,9 @@ var clarifyQuestionVariants = map[dialogue.Slot][]string{
"Что именно отметить?",
"Назови, что записать — например, «выпил воды».",
},
// Not spoken since Vikunja #556: askClarify answers actNotRecognized for a
// missing capability rather than asking. Kept because clarifyQuestion still
// reports the gap, and a re-ask deck with a hole in it is harder to read.
dialogue.SlotFn: {
"Что сделать?",
"Какое действие выполнить?",
@@ -49,35 +50,16 @@ var clarifyQuestionVariants = map[dialogue.Slot][]string{
},
}
// namedActsCap bounds how many capability names one question may recite. Six is
// what a spoken sentence carries; past that the list stops being an answer and
// becomes a wall he has to hold in his head.
const namedActsCap = 6
// fnClarify decides what to say about an act whose capability is missing, and
// whether the request is worth parking (Vikunja #556).
// actNotRecognized is what an act she cannot run gets (Vikunja #556).
//
// The old deck asked "Что сделать?" whatever was on the other end. With an empty
// allowlist that question has no answer: nothing he says can match, so she asks,
// fails, asks again and gives up — three turns spent on a request she could have
// declined in the first one. So an empty allowlist names the gap and parks
// nothing, and a non-empty one asks a question he can actually answer by naming
// what she has.
func fnClarify(allow []string, attempt int) (reply string, ask bool) {
if len(allow) == 0 {
return "Я пока ничего не умею делать — мне не разрешён ни один инструмент.", false
}
q, ok := clarifyQuestionFor(dialogue.SlotFn, attempt)
if !ok {
return "", false
}
named := allow
tail := ""
if len(named) > namedActsCap {
named, tail = named[:namedActsCap], "…"
}
return q + " Я умею: " + strings.Join(named, ", ") + tail + ".", true
}
// The deck used to ask "Что сделать?" instead. That question has no answer he
// can give: he already said what he wanted, and nothing he repeats will match a
// capability that is not there. So she asked, failed, asked again and gave up —
// three turns spent on one refusal. She says it once now, and parks nothing.
//
// It does not recite the allowlist. A list of names he did not ask about is not
// an answer to the thing he did ask about.
const actNotRecognized = "Такую команду я не знаю."
// clarifyQuestionFor picks the wording for this attempt. attempt is 1-based, as
// PendingQuestion.Attempts counts it; anything past the list uses the last and