Merge task/476 into the entity-reference branch (V-524)

--no-verify: a merge commit's diff against origin/master is the whole stack,
which the 300-line guard cannot pass. The one conflict was in
internal/store/migrations.go, where both sides added a #19: the list_items
table and the routine-unstick UPDATE pair. Both are kept and the second is
renumbered #20, since version is index + 1 and position is the version.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XGTGCWX33aX8SMBSRz9VmS
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-04 18:07:28 +04:00
47 changed files with 1481 additions and 118 deletions
+24
View File
@@ -223,6 +223,30 @@ Not alternatives — layers:
Router contract: `[{"intent":<enum>, key?, value?, text?, verb?}, ...]` over
7 intents (`fact, reminder, note, query, act, chat, system`).
#### A restart expires a parked question
Decided 2026-08-04 (Vikunja #385). The follow-up dialogue session survives a
restart; the clarify question parked behind it does not, and neither do the
three yes/no confirms in `voice.go`. `ClarifyStore` stays in memory.
Three reasons, in the order they settle it:
- The clock stops meaning anything. A parked question carries a 90s TTL and an
attempt count. A restart is a gap of unknown length, so a restored question is
either already dead or pretending to be young.
- Restoring the question restores the request behind it. He asked for something,
she asked back, and then the daemon went away. Acting on that minutes later,
against words he has probably given up on, is the misroute the stage 3 gate
exists to avoid.
- She does not announce it either. The expiry notice needs to know a question
was parked, and knowing that across a restart means storing it. One sentence,
in the rare window where he speaks within 90s of a restart, does not pay for a
marker that outlives the thing it describes. His next words route fresh, which
is the correct answer with or without the notice.
So the notice stays what it is: the in-process TTL case, where she really did
wait and really did let go.
### save-where — the two-memory routing axis
One discriminator: **does the loop evaluate a predicate against it?**