store: wake the routines accepted before the fire-forever fix (V-377)
Routines accepted before Vikunja #366 carry accepted_ts NULL and a live reminder row. The tick loop reads accepted_ts to decide when a routine is next due, so those rows have been silent since the fix landed, while the reminder they still point at keeps firing on its own schedule. Migration #19 cancels that reminder first, then dates the acceptance from created_ts and lets the reminder id go. Order matters: the second update clears the id the first one needs.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -219,6 +219,35 @@ ALTER TABLE reminders ADD COLUMN next_fire_ts INTEGER;`, // #2
|
||||
// event, and the old rows would otherwise be recited as extra meetings.
|
||||
// The filter is exact — it keeps any key whose summary part still has a
|
||||
// letter or a digit in it.
|
||||
|
||||
// #19 — unstick the routines accepted before the fire-forever fix
|
||||
// (Vikunja #377, follow-up to #366). Accepting used to leave accepted_ts
|
||||
// NULL and a live one-shot reminder behind, and the tick loop skips a row
|
||||
// with no accepted_ts, so every non-weekly routine accepted before that fix
|
||||
// has been silent ever since.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Three statements, in this order, per stuck row: adopt created_ts as the
|
||||
// acceptance time, cancel the reminder that is still holding the schedule,
|
||||
// then let go of it. Cancelling before clearing matters — clearing first
|
||||
// loses the only pointer to the reminder and leaves it to fire on its own.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// created_ts rather than a fresh timestamp because a migration has no
|
||||
// clock, and because the first interval should be measured from when he
|
||||
// said yes. A routine whose interval has already elapsed nudges on the next
|
||||
// tick, which is what being unstuck looks like.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Weekly rows are included deliberately. Theirs was the case that kept
|
||||
// working, because the cron reminder reschedules itself — so leaving them
|
||||
// alone would give them both a cron reminder and a tick-loop schedule for
|
||||
// one habit, and he would hear it twice.
|
||||
`UPDATE reminders
|
||||
SET status = 'cancelled'
|
||||
WHERE status = 'pending'
|
||||
AND id IN (SELECT reminder_id FROM proposed_routines
|
||||
WHERE status = 'accepted' AND accepted_ts IS NULL AND reminder_id IS NOT NULL);
|
||||
UPDATE proposed_routines
|
||||
SET accepted_ts = created_ts, reminder_id = NULL
|
||||
WHERE status = 'accepted' AND accepted_ts IS NULL;`,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// migrate applies every migration with a number greater than the DB's current
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ package store
|
||||
import (
|
||||
"context"
|
||||
"testing"
|
||||
"time"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
func userVersion(t *testing.T, s *Store) int {
|
||||
@@ -80,3 +81,69 @@ func TestCollapsedCalendarKeysAreDropped(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("%d calendar rows left, want the 2 that identify their event", got)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TestStuckRoutinesAreBackfilled — routines accepted before the fire-forever
|
||||
// fix have accepted_ts NULL and a live reminder, so the tick loop skips them
|
||||
// and they have been silent ever since (Vikunja #377). The migration touches
|
||||
// live reminders, which is why it is tested against a real store.
|
||||
func TestStuckRoutinesAreBackfilled(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
ctx := context.Background()
|
||||
s := newTestStore(t)
|
||||
created := time.Date(2026, 7, 1, 9, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC)
|
||||
|
||||
rem, err := s.CreateReminder(ctx, created.Add(time.Hour), "полить цветы", "")
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
healthy, err := s.CreateReminder(ctx, created.Add(2*time.Hour), "не трогать", "")
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if _, err := s.db.ExecContext(ctx,
|
||||
`INSERT INTO proposed_routines (action, object, interval_days, status, created_ts, reminder_id, accepted_ts)
|
||||
VALUES ('water', 'plants', 7, 'accepted', ?, ?, NULL)`,
|
||||
created.UnixMilli(), rem); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
// An already-healthy accepted row, and a still-open proposal: neither is
|
||||
// this migration's business.
|
||||
if _, err := s.db.ExecContext(ctx,
|
||||
`INSERT INTO proposed_routines (action, object, interval_days, status, created_ts, accepted_ts)
|
||||
VALUES ('feed', 'cat', 1, 'accepted', ?, ?)`,
|
||||
created.UnixMilli(), created.UnixMilli()); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if _, err := s.db.ExecContext(ctx, migrations[18]); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("migration 19: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
accepted, err := s.ListAcceptedRoutines(ctx)
|
||||
if err != nil || len(accepted) != 2 {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("ListAcceptedRoutines = %d rows, err=%v, want 2", len(accepted), err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
stuck := accepted[0]
|
||||
if stuck.Object != "plants" {
|
||||
stuck = accepted[1]
|
||||
}
|
||||
if stuck.AcceptedTs == nil || !stuck.AcceptedTs.Equal(created) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("accepted_ts = %v, want the creation time", stuck.AcceptedTs)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if stuck.ReminderID != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("reminder_id = %v, want it let go", stuck.ReminderID)
|
||||
}
|
||||
// The reminder it was holding is cancelled, and nothing else is.
|
||||
var status string
|
||||
if err := s.db.QueryRowContext(ctx, `SELECT status FROM reminders WHERE id = ?`, rem).Scan(&status); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if status != ReminderCancelled {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("linked reminder status = %q, want cancelled", status)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if err := s.db.QueryRowContext(ctx, `SELECT status FROM reminders WHERE id = ?`, healthy).Scan(&status); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if status != "pending" {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("unrelated reminder status = %q, want it untouched", status)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user