Read the source column off the badge, not off the wording (V-662)

The third run of the same 140 turns, with the harness fix in. Sixty-eight
turns name a source.

Two findings the wording could not carry. The unfixed homelab turns are
claimed by weather and by feeds, which the destination fixture predicted.
And agenda questions are claimed by the personal boundary and by Praxis,
not by the calendar: 3 of 6, the same 3 of 6 the destination fixture and
every routing-head seed score.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013ptwopxyo3Z2kwFckHkLvN

docs/evals/2026-08-08-two-weeks-after-merge.md

@@ -80,12 +80,53 @@ V-655 was never going to touch this. A parked clarify is dialogue state and not
 a query source. It remains the single worst thing about talking to her. The week test, the
 fortnight test and this re-run all report it unchanged.
 
-## A gap in the harness
+## A gap in the harness, fixed and re-run the same day
 
 `ipc.ChatReply.Source` came back empty on all 140 turns, in both runs. The
-driver reads it from the redirect query string and there is nothing there. So
+driver read the redirect parameter `src` and `cmd/mavweb/chat.go` writes `s`.
-the badge that says which query source claimed a turn is invisible to the
+So every finding above is read off the reply text instead of off the badge.
-harness, and every finding above is read off the reply text instead.
 
-That is worth fixing before the next re-run. Reading the source directly would
+Fixed in V-662 and the 140 turns were driven a third time. Sixty-eight of them
-have shown the two homelab misses without inferring them from the wording.
+name a source. The rest are not query turns and never reach `queryWalk`.
+
+| source | turns |
+|---|---|
+| search | 27 |
+| memory | 13 |
+| personal | 9 |
+| weather | 5 |
+| calendar | 3 |
+| attention | 3 |
+| list | 2 |
+| feeds | 2 |
+| tasks, money, self, habits | 1 each |
+
+## What the badge shows that the wording did not
+
+The two unfixed homelab turns are now direct evidence.
+
+```text
+какая скорость у меня сейчас?        -> weather
+хватает ли места под новые бэкапы?   -> feeds
+```
+
+Both are guessing sources claiming a turn about the box, exactly as the
+destination fixture predicted.
+
+The badge also names a defect the wording hid. **Agenda questions are being
+claimed by the personal boundary and by Praxis, not by the calendar.**
+
+```text
+во сколько у меня встреча?   -> personal    не нашла у тебя такой записи
+когда у меня встреча?        -> attention   у Praxis нет источников
+что у меня в понедельник?    -> personal    не нашла у тебя такой записи
+```
+
+Calendar claimed 3 turns of the 6 that asked about the calendar. That is the
+same 3/6 the destination fixture scores and the same 3/6 every seed of the
+routing head scores. Three measurements agree. The cause is the one V-660 named. The possessive
+agenda rules claim these at stage 0 and name no destination, so the walk
+reaches `personal` and `attention` first.
+
+This is the third independent confirmation that the possessive agenda rules
+should name the calendar. That call is still the owner's.