The prompt named seven intents but never said which one a clock or date
question belongs to, so the model guessed: system->query x4 in every eval
run. The rule now says the clock and the calendar date themselves are
system, what is written in the calendar or in memory stays query, and a
time named inside a request is just part of the request.
That split follows what the daemon can answer. Only replySystem owns the
clock and the date formatter, while the agenda is answered from
CalendarEvents inside the query branch.
Also adds one calendar-agenda fixture case so an over-broad system rule
cannot pass unnoticed, and writes up the before/after numbers. The
targeted confusion is gone; the headline accuracy did not move.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The embedder swap left every stored vector in the old model's space, so cosine against a new query vector is noise. Add the one-shot backfill: store.ReembedAll re-embeds every note and fact text with the currently configured embedder (the passage side, which is the side stored text was written with) and rewrites both places a vector lives — the notes table embedding column and the memory_vectors rows.
All of it plus the embedder marker happens in one transaction, so a failure partway changes nothing and writes no marker: re-run it. A run against a DB whose marker already names the current embedder does nothing.
Triggered explicitly with `mavend -reembed`, not automatically on mismatch: ONNX on the laptop CPU makes this minutes of work, and a silent multi-minute stall on boot would look like a hang. The mismatch warning now tells the user to run it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The embedder moved from paraphrase-multilingual-MiniLM-L12-v2 to
multilingual-e5-small. Both are 384-dimensional, so nothing in the code
noticed: cosine between an old stored vector and a new query vector is
noise, and recall degrades silently.
So the DB now records the embedder that wrote its vectors. One value for
the whole DB (migration #11, a small `meta` key/value table) rather than a
column on every vector row: the backfill re-embeds every note and fact in
one pass, so a per-row marker would hold the same string in every row and
cost a column on two tables for nothing.
The identity comes from the embedder itself via a new optional ID() method
("multilingual-e5-small@384", model file name plus dimension), so pointing
the config at another model changes the string without anyone editing a
constant. mavend logs a loud WARNING at startup naming both the stored and
the configured embedder when they differ.
Detection only — recall behaviour is unchanged. TODO(#378) in
store.CheckEmbedder marks where the backfill will hook in.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The memory pass ran only after the notes-only gate had already rejected
the same note at the same score. Notes and facts share one vector index,
so a note that failed there failed again — the branch could only ever
return a fact.
Now the memory pass runs first: one search over everything Maven
remembers, one gate, and the memory that clearly matches best answers
(a note gets phrased, a fact is read back). The notes-only pass stays
behind it for notes the vector index does not hold. No threshold moved,
so the set of questions answered is unchanged — only which memory
answers them.
Fixture gained two mixed note+fact cases, so the answerable count goes
25 -> 27: hash recall@1 36.0% -> 37.0% (ratchet 0.32 unchanged, comment
updated), e5 recall@1 72.0% -> 70.4%, false recall still 1/5.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The 67.1% "thinking off" column in ROUTING-EVAL-31-07-2026.md was an
artefact. It came from a hand-rolled HTTP client in the eval test that
did not send repeat_penalty, so it differed from the reference run on two
axes and the penalty was the one that mattered.
Re-scored back to back on an idle box with everything else held equal:
thinking off is identical to thinking on, case for case, same confusion
matrix, same three unparseable replies. A direct probe of the running
llama-server shows enable_thinking, thinking and reasoning_budget are all
ignored for this model on this build, so there was nothing to turn off.
No defaults changed. The misleading third configuration is removed from
internal/router/eval so its table cannot be quoted again.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Vikunja #363. The follow-up session was a plain in-memory map, so any
mavend restart dropped the thread. It now mirrors to a small TTL-pruned
sqlite table and is loaded on startup; expired sessions are deleted on
load, not revived. Clarify's pending question is untouched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
An unclear answer used to end the request on the spot. Now she re-asks the same
question while attempts remain, and when they run out she says
"Прости, я не поняла. Скажи, пожалуйста, по-другому." — silence would leave him
thinking it was handled. Same reply when the missing slot has no question to
ask, and as a floor in finishClarified so an empty reply can never ship.
Tests: three questions allowed, the fourth gives up out loud, the cap is
configurable, and a restated time is the one that lands.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
MaxAttempts was 1, justified as "not a nag". Wrong reading: "not a nag" is about
interrupting unprompted, and a clarifying question is part of a conversation he
started. Now three, configurable via voice.clarify_max_attempts (default 3).
Three, because after that the likely problem is she misheard the whole request,
not one slot.
Answer used to keep the parked value, so "в три" then "нет, в пять" threw the
five away. Now a value the answer carries wins for the slot she asked about.
Only for the clarify answer — a correction in a fresh turn is followUpMerge.
The eight-field chained assertion in the Answer test is one DeepEqual now, so a
new field in Slots is covered without touching the test.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The system prompt showed the JSON contract as {"response": "..."} and the
user prompt repeated it. A 0.8B copies whatever sits in the response slot, so
7 of 15 nudges came back as literally "...".
Changes, all prompt-side — the {"response","mood"} contract is unchanged:
- nudge system prompt is Russian, feminine self-reference, with filled-in
examples on topics that never appear as rules, so copying them is visible
- rule names get a Russian gloss and a required keyword, named last in the
prompt where a small model weights it hardest
- durations render in Russian, not English
- the no-parse fallback says something Russian instead of "water — care",
which was going straight to a Russian piper voice
- same "..." placeholder removed from replier_llm.go
Scored on internal/phraser/eval: 0/15 -> 13/15.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The e5 embedder puts every cosine in one narrow band (0.79-0.89), so the
absolute query_min_score gate cannot tell a real hit from a made-up
question: any value under the band answers everything, any value above it
answers nothing. False recall was 5/5.
New gate asks whether one note is clearly the best instead: top1 - top2 >
delta. New query_min_margin config knob, default 0.008, read off the sweep
in the recall harness. The absolute floor stays as a second check.
On the recall fixture with e5: answered 72% -> 68%, false recall 5/5 -> 1/5.
Vikunja #359
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The two things that made this unsafe are fixed: the router can now
refuse, and slot extraction runs on its decisions.
On the held-out fixture it gets 63.2% of intents right against the
classifier's 50.0%, with no route errors. It costs about a second a
turn instead of 30ms.
The flag is a pointer now, so leaving it out of the config means on
and only writing false turns it off.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
An LLM-routed reminder came back with no parsed time and an act with no
fn, because only the classifier path ran the extractor. Now the router
runs the same extraction after an LLM decision and fills only the empty
slots. No time in the utterance still means no time.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
recall@1 60% to 72%, answered 48% to 72%, latency 3x better. But false
recall went 1/5 to 5/5: e5 packs every score into a narrow high band, so
the 0.55 gate now admits everything. Left the gate alone as instructed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The old model was a symmetric paraphrase model, so it scored "do these
look alike" instead of "does this note answer this question". Also fixes
the file mismatch: the Makefile, the deploy config and both evals now all
name the same quantized file, and the quantized one is what gets measured.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Note recall is asymmetric: a short question goes in, a longer note comes
out. Adds EmbedQuery/EmbedPassage helpers and the e5 prefixes, and points
the note/fact write path at the passage side and the query path at the
query side. Reviewers: the three call sites in voice.go.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Chose an 8th enum value over a confidence number: the model already picks
one enum token, so it costs nothing in the grammar, while a score from a
0.8B model would be uncalibrated noise. A refusal returns "no decision"
with no error, which is the fall-through the caller already uses for a
bad parse, so the classifier and its clarify gate take the turn.
Reviewers: the prompt's counter-examples matter most — a small model will
over-use any easy escape hatch. The training workspace copy of the prompt
still needs the same edit (Vikunja #362).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The earlier before/after was taken while another eval shared
llama-server. This run had the box to itself.
Intent accuracy 61.8% llm-only, 63.2% cascade, 67.1% with thinking off.
The prompt fix holds. note→fact shows up here too, so it is real.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
DESIGN.md has always said `make test` is "gofmt + vet + -race, no
exceptions". It only ever ran the tests, which is how nine files drifted
out of format without anyone noticing.
`test` now depends on `fmt-check` and `vet`. Checked that fmt-check does
fail when a file is unformatted, so the gate is real and not decorative.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Two merge fixes on top of the branch:
- migrations: keep both new steps, snooze stays #8, the routine columns
become #9. Both agents had numbered theirs #8.
- accepting no longer takes a reminder id, on the web surface too. The
web accept path had the same one-shot-reminder bug the voice path did,
so both now just flip the status and let the tick loop schedule.
The test that asserted "accept creates a reminder and links it" asserted
the bug. It now asserts that accepting creates no reminder.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The tick loop now reads accepted routines from the store and nudges when
their interval has passed; accepting no longer builds a one-shot reminder.
Look at routine.DueAccepted for the schedule rule (no catch-up backlog) and
at fireAcceptedRoutines for the restraint gate — routines do not bypass it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Two agents wrote the same three test helpers and names for the same two
bugs. Kept the real assertions from dispatcher_test.go and removed the
skipped placeholders they replace. panicSink stays in durability_test.go
since both files use it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Data layer only. Migration #8 adds accepted_ts and last_fired_ts to
proposed_routines, plus ListAcceptedRoutines and MarkRoutineFired so the
tick loop can own the schedule. Accepting no longer links a reminder id.
Look at the TODO(vikunja#366) in cmd/mavend/tick.go for the next commit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
kami