voice.go is still the biggest file in cmd/mavend and most of what is left
has nothing to do with the audio path. The ecosystem integration is one
such lump: it talks to Nexus, Praxis and Hexis over HTTP and only touches
the handler for its store and clock. Lifting it into ecosystem_acts.go
puts it next to ecosystem.go, where the clients it drives already live.
Move-only: handlePraxisAct, recordPraxisTrace (called from nowhere else),
handleHexisAct and execHexis verbatim, plus the two imports that became
unused in voice.go.
applyAction (cmd/mavend/voice.go) dispatched all 7 intents from one giant
switch. Extract each case body verbatim into its own actionXxx method in
new cmd/mavend/actions.go, dispatched from an actionHandlers table keyed by
router.Intent. applyAction itself is now just the dec.Clarify guard plus a
table lookup.
No behaviour change: same reply strings, same side-effect order, comments
moved verbatim. The destructive-act confirm gate and the enabled-tool
allowlist stay entirely inside actionAct, exactly where they lived in the
old switch's IntentAct case — they're act-specific, not cross-cutting, so
they don't move to a separate layer. dec.Clarify short-circuit, dialogue
bookkeeping and detectPattern stay outside the table since they run
regardless of intent.
voice.go: 1638 -> 1344 lines. New actions.go: 362 lines.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Vikunja #281. The interruption policy promised four outcomes — deliver_now,
queue, digest, drop — but only three existed: a care candidate the restraint
gate suppressed for quiet hours / away / calendar-busy simply vanished in
loop.Tick's `continue`, with only the trace remembering why.
internal/morning turned out not to be the natural drain: it's a fixed
Item/FactKey checklist engine, not a generic message bundler, so gate-
suppressed nudge text has nowhere to plug into its evidence model. Built a
parallel (but small, reusing the outbox's shape) durable digest instead:
- internal/store: digest_entries table + EnqueueDigestEntry (dedupes by
rule+body, mirroring the delivery outbox's bodyHash), PendingDigestEntries,
ExpireStaleDigestEntries, DrainDigestEntries (mark, never delete — an
audit trail of what she actually said).
- internal/loop: DigestEligible(severity, blockedBy) is the pure boundary —
only genuine restraint blocks (quiet_hours/calendar_busy/presence) even
qualify (cooldown/snooze are not "suppression"); within care, Sev2 (break)
digests, Sev1 (water/meal — stale by the time anyone could resurface them)
drops. High severity never digests; alarms bypass the gate and deliver
unchanged, on purpose.
- cmd/mavend/tick.go: each tick scans ExplainTick's trace for eligible
blocked candidates, enqueues them, sweeps stale entries (24h expiry — the
care rules are daily-cadence, so anything older is describing a day
that's over), and drains the bundle only once the suppression reason has
actually cleared, capped at 3 spoken items plus a trailing count so a
digest can't turn into the exact nagging it was built to avoid.
Tests: store-level round-trip/restart-survival/dedupe/expiry/drain, loop-
level severity-boundary unit tests, and tick-level integration tests for
the drain-only-when-clear and never-digest-high-severity behavior.
detectPattern only ever fired as a side effect of a voice fact-write, so a
recurring pattern already sitting in history went unnoticed until he
happened to mention it again by voice — the opposite of proactive.
Split the pipeline: extraction (fact -> normalized event) stays where a fact
is written, in voice.go, since it's tied to that write regardless of who's
talking. Detection (events -> stable pattern -> proposed_routines row) moves
into shared code (patterns.go's detectAndPropose) that both the voice path
and the new tick.go:detectPatterns call. The tick runs it every cycle over
every action+object pair on record (store.DistinctEventPairs, added), so a
pattern gets noticed on the daemon's own schedule.
Idempotence and the dismiss-must-stick requirement turned out to already be
handled by the store, not something the tick needs to reinvent:
proposed_routines has UNIQUE(action, object) and CreateProposedRoutine does
ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING, and DismissProposedRoutine flips status in place
without deleting the row. So a pair already proposed, accepted, OR
dismissed is a silent no-op on every later tick — a dismissed pattern can
never resurface, and re-running the scan never spams the /routines page.
Kept the voice-path call (immediate spoken confirmation is a nice feature
UX-wise and is now redundant-but-harmless with the tick, since both paths
share the same guarded detectAndPropose).
Tick-side detection only ever writes a row; it does not notify, ring, or
speak, keeping Maven "not a nag, not autonomous" — the /routines page is
still the only place a proposal becomes visible, and only accepting it
starts producing nudges (fireAcceptedRoutines).
Also fixed the stale vikunja#46 reference in proposed_routines.go — the
TODO it named is what this commit does.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
PR #47 added two state-changing routes (POST /chat, POST /routines)
behind the -addr flag, which defaulted to ":9200" (all interfaces).
Default now binds 127.0.0.1:9200; anyone who wants LAN/wider exposure
still passes an explicit bind (as deploy/docker-compose.yml already
does with "-addr :9201" inside the container, unaffected by this
default change).
Vikunja #317.
Wording fixes from the review of the clarify + phrasing PRs.
- "На когда напомнить?" → "Когда?". After she has just been asked something,
the long form is the phrasing of a form field, not of a person.
- A reminder now wants a subject as well as a time. "напомни в 11" had a time
and nothing to say at 11, and she asked nothing at all — she now asks
"О чём напомнить?". Subject first, since a reminder with no subject is not
worth setting.
- The expiry notice is five phrasings picked at random instead of one fixed
sentence. It is the line he hears every time he walks off mid-request, so it
is the line that repeats most.
- The nudge prompt's ban on "обращения" is now "ласковые обращения". It was
meant to forbid "милый"/"дорогой", not his name — "Ками, ноутбук на трёх
процентах" is how she talks, and the eval's cringe check already only flags
pet names.
- The nudge example no longer claims she plugged the laptop in. She has no
hands and no smart plug; an example where she acts teaches the model to
invent actions Maven never took.
- replySystem: "тепло" → "спокойно и без официальных формулировок". A one-word
mood instruction a 1.7B can't act on, replaced with the behaviour meant.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
DEPRECATION, flagged not asked: LLM-phrased nudges are no longer the default.
LLMPhraser.PhraseNudge now returns a hand-written Russian template. The model
still phrases chat, queries and reminders — only nudges moved.
Why: measured over many runs, Qwen3.5-0.8B wrote formal "вы" and plural
imperatives, used masculine self-reference, and invented facts and units
(90-95 seconds to boil an egg). A nudge is five words of known content, so
generation buys nothing and risks the persona every time. Templates score
15/15 on the nudge fixture, the model 11-13/15.
Nothing is deleted: the prompt, the fallbacks and the whole LLM nudge path
stay. Set phraser.llm_nudges = true in deploy/mavend.json to get them back.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The context block now lists her real capabilities: reminders, notes and
facts (write and recall), and the calendar — all three are code paths in
mavend today. Weather, telegram and shell acts are listed only when the
config actually has them, because offering something she cannot do is
worse than staying quiet about it.
Also drops the pronouns from the optional name/city line. The block's
own "ты" is Maven, so "тебя зовут" read as her name and "его" would have
shown her the third-person form she must never use about him. They are
plain labels now.
Vikunja #394.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The "address him as ты" rule had only reached two of the five system
prompts. Instead of pasting it into the other three (five copies drift —
that is how this happened), there is now one block, in internal/persona,
prepended to all five: nudges, action replies, chat, note queries and
general knowledge.
The block says who he is and how to address him (a man, always "ты",
never "вы", never "он" about him; Maven stays feminine), plus the
current local date and time. It is rendered fresh each turn because the
time changes, and it is correct with an empty config — the address and
gender rules are defaults in code. Config only adds optional facts:
owner_name, city, and the existing free-text `persona` string, which is
now the static half of the block.
Russian even in front of the English prompts: the rules are Russian
grammar, so they read best stated in Russian, and there is one copy.
Vikunja #394.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The prompts stated the feminine self-reference rule but never said whom she is
speaking to, so the model produced formal plural ("Жду вас") and talked about
him in third person ("Он не ел 11 дней"). Adds the address rule right next to
the feminine one, in the nudge prompt and the confirmation prompt.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The user only ever asks the time in his own zone, so answering other
cities was code kept in step with the weather city list for no gain.
Any named place now gets the honest "local time only" answer that was
already there for unknown cities.
Removes the 22-entry table, the lookup and the embedded tz database.
Closes Vikunja #389 — there is only one city list again.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
replySystem had two arms that PR 30 made reachable, and both answered confidently wrong: the date arm keyword-matched "числ" and always answered today, so "какое число завтра" answered today; the clock arm ignored a named city and answered local time. The date arm now reads the day word through router.ParseCalendarDate (which grew послезавтра/вчера and now cuts the day boundary in the local zone instead of UTC). The clock arm answers the named zone when it resolves offline from the tz database embedded in the binary, and otherwise says plainly that she only knows local time.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The embedder swap left every stored vector in the old model's space, so cosine against a new query vector is noise. Add the one-shot backfill: store.ReembedAll re-embeds every note and fact text with the currently configured embedder (the passage side, which is the side stored text was written with) and rewrites both places a vector lives — the notes table embedding column and the memory_vectors rows.
All of it plus the embedder marker happens in one transaction, so a failure partway changes nothing and writes no marker: re-run it. A run against a DB whose marker already names the current embedder does nothing.
Triggered explicitly with `mavend -reembed`, not automatically on mismatch: ONNX on the laptop CPU makes this minutes of work, and a silent multi-minute stall on boot would look like a hang. The mismatch warning now tells the user to run it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The embedder moved from paraphrase-multilingual-MiniLM-L12-v2 to
multilingual-e5-small. Both are 384-dimensional, so nothing in the code
noticed: cosine between an old stored vector and a new query vector is
noise, and recall degrades silently.
So the DB now records the embedder that wrote its vectors. One value for
the whole DB (migration #11, a small `meta` key/value table) rather than a
column on every vector row: the backfill re-embeds every note and fact in
one pass, so a per-row marker would hold the same string in every row and
cost a column on two tables for nothing.
The identity comes from the embedder itself via a new optional ID() method
("multilingual-e5-small@384", model file name plus dimension), so pointing
the config at another model changes the string without anyone editing a
constant. mavend logs a loud WARNING at startup naming both the stored and
the configured embedder when they differ.
Detection only — recall behaviour is unchanged. TODO(#378) in
store.CheckEmbedder marks where the backfill will hook in.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The memory pass ran only after the notes-only gate had already rejected
the same note at the same score. Notes and facts share one vector index,
so a note that failed there failed again — the branch could only ever
return a fact.
Now the memory pass runs first: one search over everything Maven
remembers, one gate, and the memory that clearly matches best answers
(a note gets phrased, a fact is read back). The notes-only pass stays
behind it for notes the vector index does not hold. No threshold moved,
so the set of questions answered is unchanged — only which memory
answers them.
Fixture gained two mixed note+fact cases, so the answerable count goes
25 -> 27: hash recall@1 36.0% -> 37.0% (ratchet 0.32 unchanged, comment
updated), e5 recall@1 72.0% -> 70.4%, false recall still 1/5.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Vikunja #363. The follow-up session was a plain in-memory map, so any
mavend restart dropped the thread. It now mirrors to a small TTL-pruned
sqlite table and is loaded on startup; expired sessions are deleted on
load, not revived. Clarify's pending question is untouched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
An unclear answer used to end the request on the spot. Now she re-asks the same
question while attempts remain, and when they run out she says
"Прости, я не поняла. Скажи, пожалуйста, по-другому." — silence would leave him
thinking it was handled. Same reply when the missing slot has no question to
ask, and as a floor in finishClarified so an empty reply can never ship.
Tests: three questions allowed, the fourth gives up out loud, the cap is
configurable, and a restated time is the one that lands.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The system prompt showed the JSON contract as {"response": "..."} and the
user prompt repeated it. A 0.8B copies whatever sits in the response slot, so
7 of 15 nudges came back as literally "...".
Changes, all prompt-side — the {"response","mood"} contract is unchanged:
- nudge system prompt is Russian, feminine self-reference, with filled-in
examples on topics that never appear as rules, so copying them is visible
- rule names get a Russian gloss and a required keyword, named last in the
prompt where a small model weights it hardest
- durations render in Russian, not English
- the no-parse fallback says something Russian instead of "water — care",
which was going straight to a Russian piper voice
- same "..." placeholder removed from replier_llm.go
Scored on internal/phraser/eval: 0/15 -> 13/15.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The e5 embedder puts every cosine in one narrow band (0.79-0.89), so the
absolute query_min_score gate cannot tell a real hit from a made-up
question: any value under the band answers everything, any value above it
answers nothing. False recall was 5/5.
New gate asks whether one note is clearly the best instead: top1 - top2 >
delta. New query_min_margin config knob, default 0.008, read off the sweep
in the recall harness. The absolute floor stays as a second check.
On the recall fixture with e5: answered 72% -> 68%, false recall 5/5 -> 1/5.
Vikunja #359
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The two things that made this unsafe are fixed: the router can now
refuse, and slot extraction runs on its decisions.
On the held-out fixture it gets 63.2% of intents right against the
classifier's 50.0%, with no route errors. It costs about a second a
turn instead of 30ms.
The flag is a pointer now, so leaving it out of the config means on
and only writing false turns it off.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Note recall is asymmetric: a short question goes in, a longer note comes
out. Adds EmbedQuery/EmbedPassage helpers and the e5 prefixes, and points
the note/fact write path at the passage side and the query path at the
query side. Reviewers: the three call sites in voice.go.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Two merge fixes on top of the branch:
- migrations: keep both new steps, snooze stays #8, the routine columns
become #9. Both agents had numbered theirs #8.
- accepting no longer takes a reminder id, on the web surface too. The
web accept path had the same one-shot-reminder bug the voice path did,
so both now just flip the status and let the tick loop schedule.
The test that asserted "accept creates a reminder and links it" asserted
the bug. It now asserts that accepting creates no reminder.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The tick loop now reads accepted routines from the store and nudges when
their interval has passed; accepting no longer builds a one-shot reminder.
Look at routine.DueAccepted for the schedule rule (no catch-up backlog) and
at fireAcceptedRoutines for the restraint gate — routines do not bypass it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Data layer only. Migration #8 adds accepted_ts and last_fired_ts to
proposed_routines, plus ListAcceptedRoutines and MarkRoutineFired so the
tick loop can own the schedule. Accepting no longer links a reminder id.
Look at the TODO(vikunja#366) in cmd/mavend/tick.go for the next commit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Covers: a reminder with no time is asked about and completes on the answer; the
same for a fact; an answer past the TTL falls through as a fresh utterance; a
second unclear answer drops the request with no second question; a clarified act
off the allowlist neither runs nor gets enabled; a clarified destructive act
still parks a confirm; noise keeps the canned reply. No model, no network.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
On a clarify decision with one identifiable gap she now asks instead of saying
"не поняла", and parks the request. The next utterance is parsed as the answer
with the router's own extractor and the completed decision runs through
applyAction like any other — so a clarified act still needs the allowlist and
still hits the destructive confirm gate. An answer that does not fill the gap
drops the request; she never asks twice. Also pulls the session-store block
that HandlePushToTalk and handleText both had into rememberTurn, since the
clarify path needed a third copy.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
A table per intent (reminder needs a time, fact needs a key, act needs a fn)
plus one fixed Russian question per slot. Templates, not model output: a 0.8B
would wander and a question that rewords itself is harder to answer. Note,
query, chat and system get no question — for those a clarify decision keeps
the canned reply rather than inventing a question for noise.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Covers: a reminder with no time is asked about and completes on the answer; the
same for a fact; an answer past the TTL falls through as a fresh utterance; a
second unclear answer drops the request with no second question; a clarified act
off the allowlist neither runs nor gets enabled; a clarified destructive act
still parks a confirm; noise keeps the canned reply. No model, no network.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
On a clarify decision with one identifiable gap she now asks instead of saying
"не поняла", and parks the request. The next utterance is parsed as the answer
with the router's own extractor and the completed decision runs through
applyAction like any other — so a clarified act still needs the allowlist and
still hits the destructive confirm gate. An answer that does not fill the gap
drops the request; she never asks twice. Also pulls the session-store block
that HandlePushToTalk and handleText both had into rememberTurn, since the
clarify path needed a third copy.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Accepting a routine gives the trigger loop a new standing reason to speak to
the human, so it is the same authority tier as enabling a tool and shares the
stepUpOK gate; dismiss only ever makes maven quieter, so it is ungated.
Look at handleRoutines and acceptRoutine in cmd/mavweb/main.go: accept creates
the recurring reminder, then links it via the new ipc AcceptProposedRoutine.
The page now says what maven noticed in her own words (pattern.PhraseRoutine).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
A table per intent (reminder needs a time, fact needs a key, act needs a fn)
plus one fixed Russian question per slot. Templates, not model output: a 0.8B
would wander and a question that rewords itself is harder to answer. Note,
query, chat and system get no question — for those a clarify decision keeps
the canned reply rather than inventing a question for noise.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
kami