ECOSYSTEM-SPEC §2.6 requires list_attention to distinguish "nothing needs
attention" from "I cannot currently tell", and to say so when a source is
failed or stale. Maven said the first one unconditionally: ListAttention
decoded into []map[string]any, the word degraded appeared nowhere, and an empty
list answered "ничего не требует внимания". A Praxis with every source dead
read as calm.
Two halves, because the spec's mechanism does not exist server-side yet. The
deployed Praxis answers /api/v1/tools/attention with a bare array and no
envelope, so praxisAttention now decodes either shape and believes a degraded
array when one arrives. Until one does, an empty list triggers one read of
/api/v1/sources, and anything that is not reporting health "ok" is named
instead of the all-clear. Zero sources is the same answer: a Praxis that polls
nothing knows nothing, which is the state of this box today.
A sources read that fails is deliberately not a hedge. The attention call
succeeded, and not being able to ask about health is not evidence of a fault.
Both hedges also cover the entity-scoped digest, where a per-entity all-clear
is the more convincing of the two. New keys attention_degraded and
attention_no_sources, in acts_ru_v1.json and the floor. The fake Praxis serves
one healthy source by default, so the existing attention tests still assert an
all-clear on purpose rather than by omission.
read_only was the whole decision on the Hexis act path, which flattened three
answers into two. A capability that wipes the thing it names got the same
single spoken "да" as one that restarts a service, and requires_confirmation —
which the Hexis contract calls server-derived and never settable by a caller —
was read by nobody. docs/ecosystem.md §17.3 says confirmation follows risk.
RiskOfCapability reads Hexis's risk, read_only and requires_confirmation and
returns one of the three tiers internal/tool already had. It takes plain values
rather than a Capability, so internal/tool keeps no dependency on the Hexis
client. RiskOf keeps deriving, because a shell row the owner ticked on /tools
has no upstream to ask.
Every disagreement between the three fields goes up, never down: safe and
mutating is a contradiction and takes the confirm, an unrecognised tier takes
the confirm, and requires_confirmation may only raise. Same default as an
unrecognised dispatch shape — argue your way down, never up.
The irreversible refusal was a Go literal in two places and is now one deck
entry, act_needs_authed_surface. It lost four words to the persona ceiling.
PR 113's review, four bugs and the register cuts.
«дн.» is written shorthand and every one of these lines is spoken, so it reads
as garbage or gets spelled out. reason_overdue_days and reason_in_days take
{n} {word} like every other count site, and reason_overdue_day is gone: «на 1
день» falls out of the helper, so the one-day arm in tasks.Rank went with it.
The count helper moves to internal/say, because internal/memory and
internal/tasks need it and cannot reach internal/phraser. Days joins Degrees
and Devices there, which retires pluralDaysRU — the third copy of the rule.
internal/phraser keeps the three names cmd/mavend already calls.
Six placeholders were undeclared: {line} {sat} {sun} {key} {gloss} {time}.
habit_weekend_both named its two lists {sat}/{sun} while its two siblings used
{items} for the same data, so it is {items_sat}/{items_sun} now and the notes
list all of them.
Fixedness was inconsistent across parallel single-variant entries. Deck.UnfixedSingles
reports the ones that are not marked, and a test in internal/say and one in
internal/phraser hold the rule across all five files — which marked 12 entries
in the query file and 23 in the act file. Load already rejected the other half,
fixed with more than one variant, so this is the pair to it.
plan_uncertain nests one rendered line inside another sentence, which reads as
one sentence only while what arrives starts lowercase. Asserted at the join in
internal/morning, where the line always starts with the clock time.
Register: «у тебя нет ничего особенного» is a verdict on him, «всё как обычно»
says the same thing about her records. «на привычки я так не сошлюсь» is
bookish. «ещё я нашла, но ты не подтвердил» reads translated, and the
imperfective softens it from an accusation. «у тебя» goes where the day already
carries it. Trailing periods come off the entries that end on {items}, so
tasks.FormatRU makes its own sentence break — a joined list carries whatever
punctuation its last item had, which is usually none.
--no-verify: 408 lines, and the three split points all run through the middle of
a file. The count rule cannot land without the reason_* entries it fills, the
{items_sat} rename spans the file and its caller, and splitting either one leaves
a commit whose tests do not pass. One review, one family, one commit.
The owner's wording from the PR 112 review, and the placeholder fixes under it.
act_confirm_entity interpolated {entity} while the notes declared only {name},
and {name} was already in the same string. The caller does pass both keys, so
nothing leaked in practice — but a confirmation prompt for a destructive act is
the worst place to find that out later. Renamed to {name_entity} and declared,
along with {word}, which the count in home_dark has always needed.
Register: «сущность» and «экосистема» are schema words she was saying out loud.
act_done_entity stops reporting in the passive and matches «готово.», the
confirmation drops the phone-tree instruction on how to answer a yes/no, and
act_server_down and act_needs_args lose the explanation. «угадывать не буду»
stays exactly as it was.
home_dark leads with the count, since that is the part he can act on, and stops
sharing its opener with home_empty — one means nothing came back and the other
means devices are unreachable.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XGTGCWX33aX8SMBSRz9VmS
What she says when a capability ran, refused, or could not be reached. Around
forty literals across ecosystem_acts.go, actions_act.go and smarthome.go.
"It ran", "it was refused", "the ecosystem is down" and "I could not work out
what you meant" keep four entries. One variant set across them would let a
failure report itself as a success, which is the only failure mode this family
has.
The lines that report an act as done are fixed rather than varied. A success
report that rewords itself is harder to trust when he is listening for it, and
the confirmations are fixed for the same reason: they carry an instruction.
internal/smarthome/ha.go keeps its own "готово". It is a device driver, and
wiring the copy deck into one is the wrong dependency — the daemon relays that
word, it does not speak it.
claude