3 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
kami	43838445ab	Write up the margin gate results ... Third section: why the absolute gate could not separate the two distributions, the delta sweep, and the before/after. Marks next-steps item 3 done. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ	2026-07-31 11:51:21 +04:00
kami	1d48755d12	Record the recall numbers after the embedder swap ... recall@1 60% to 72%, answered 48% to 72%, latency 3x better. But false recall went 1/5 to 5/5: e5 packs every score into a narrow high band, so the 0.55 gate now admits everything. Left the gate alone as instructed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ	2026-07-31 11:38:18 +04:00
kami	8a174c1c70	Score the recall fixture and write up what it shows ... Real recall is 48% after the gate, and one must-be-silent query gets an answer anyway. Review finding 2 (the score distributions overlap, so no gate separates a real recall from a false one) and finding 4 (the memStore branch at voice.go:776 is unreachable for notes). Adds an embedder cache so the gate sweep does not re-embed the fixture nine times. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ	2026-07-31 02:34:28 +04:00