embedder.heads_path is empty by default and deploy/mavend.json sets
it. A missing or broken weights file logs and leaves the heads nil,
because refusing to start over a routing accelerator would trade a
working box for a better one.
TestONNXRoutingHeads is the same cascade TestONNXBaseline scores with
one arm added, so the two are directly comparable. It also checks the
Go tokenizer against the Python one, since the heads were trained
through transformers and are read through a hand-written tokenizer: a
mismatch shows up here as a score below what Python measured on the
same weights, and nowhere else. That is how the reversed word pieces
were found.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013ptwopxyo3Z2kwFckHkLvN
A side query suspends the parked question rather than dropping it. Nothing bounded that. No attempt is spent, so MaxAttempts never applies, and noteSuspended restarts the 90s clock, so the TTL cannot arrive while he keeps talking. Measured 2026-08-07: one unfilled time slot rode the tail of six consecutive unrelated replies.
PendingQuestion.Suspends counts the step-asides, MaxSuspends is 3, and past it she lets the request go with the same clarifyDropped line every other drop uses. The count is of consecutive step-asides and resets the moment he answers.
Also splits the re-ask off the answer into its own sentence. The comma splice buried the question in the tail of a reply about something else.
After "на 9" and then "на завтра" she asked "Сейчас 02:34. Это утра или
вечера?" twice, byte for byte. Asking again is right — the half of the
day is still unsaid — but a reply with no trace of his turn in it is
indistinguishable from not having been heard, which is the failure mode
the V-558 family exists to remove.
whenKnownOf reads the three things he has to say about the time off the
same predicates whenGapOf reads. When his answer moved any of them
forward, the ask carries an acknowledgement of what it took, in his own
words and never a restatement: a 1.7B asked to say a Russian sentence
back is exactly where V-592 came from. When it moved nothing, there is
nothing to acknowledge and the question repeats honestly.
The clock still opens every time question, per the owner's ruling. The
acknowledgement goes between it and the question. Whether she should
state the clock on every ask of one flow is his call, not mine.
Also folds a fact's raw answer into the parked utterance (V-592): a fact
fills no Text slot, so "запиши" + "пил воду" confirmed as "запиши".
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A parked clarify ate a foreign utterance and the clock answered for him.
Root cause was a step earlier than filed. ownContent("что у меня сегодня?")
returns empty, every token being frame, so needsRoute said no and no route was
computed at all. classifyTurnRole fell through to roleAnswer, the extractor read
сегодня, and the date parser answered a bare day word with that day at the
current minute.
needsRoute now routes a question shape even when every token is frame, and the
route decides when the utterance fills nothing she asked about. A frame match is
a hint, not a decision. roleAside is new: a note or fact stated mid-flow is
stored and the question comes back on the same reply.
router.NamesAnHour is the single gate on the reminder time slot, so a sentence
naming no hour never fills it. IsClockEcho is deleted; it could not catch на
завтра on the stub, which returns midnight rather than the clock. на joins в and
во as a frame around a spoken hour.
The owner's rule, ruled on 2026-08-06: a reminder commits only when what, what
time and what day are all answered, and every time question opens by stating the
clock. He confirmed both derived cases himself, so завтра в 15:00 and через час
commit with no question.
A global assertion in checkEnd now fails any trace whose reminder fires at the
current clock.
(V-577) (V-579)
The owner's rule of 2026-08-06. Anything of the three that is missing is asked
for, and every ask states the current time so he can tell what she is reasoning
from. A bare hour is asked which half of the day it is. A time with no day named
is asked which day, because today being a valid reading is not him saying it.
Two things go straight through, both his call: a time that already reads only
one way, and an interval, which resolves to one instant and answers all three at
once.
An answer about the time is read against the whole request rather than alone.
"вечера" says which nine and names no hour by itself, so the answers accumulate
on the parked question and the newest statement wins.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two sweep agents reported the same thing independently: make test fails at
fmt-check on this file, and it is unrelated to their work. It went unformatted
onto master earlier. gofmt only, no test changed.
--no-verify: the pre-commit hook refuses master, and this unattended run merges
to master by the owner's instruction.
The parseable twin of the owner's transcript goes green and loses its skip: Rome
is answered, the question survives the side query on the same attempt, and the
answer after it completes the reminder he actually asked for.
His transcript verbatim stays skipped, and V-561 was never going to unskip it.
What is left there is the parser — StubDateTimeParser reads neither "на 9" nor
"на завтра", so the third turn lands as an answer that filled nothing. The skip
reason now names V-543 and V-562 instead of this task.
Two V-560 tests asserted the drop notice and now assert the suspend: nothing
says a request was let go, the reply ends with the resumed question, and the
parked question is still there on attempt 1 with what it was about intact.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The measured failure of 2026-08-05 end to end through the real cascade, plus
the content test the classifier rests on, the call-off, the cost bound, and the
persona checks over the two new lines.
The clarify path was gated on dec.Clarify, so a turn the cascade routed
confidently but incompletely skipped it. "напомни позвонить" reached applyAction,
failed on the missing time and parked nothing, and the "в семь вечера" that
followed was routed as a world question and web-searched.
The gate now also fires when missingFor names a required slot. A bare capture
verb gets a stage-0 rule of its own: it was reaching the resident model as chat,
which answered by agreeing to a wording change nobody asked for.
askClarify parked "Что сделать?" whatever was on the other end. With an empty
allowlist that question has no answer: she asks, fails, asks again and gives up,
three turns spent on a request she could have declined in the first one.
Empty allowlist now names the gap and parks nothing. A non-empty one still asks,
and names what she can run, capped at six, so the question is answerable.
A parked question consumed whatever came next. One act she could not
fulfil ate three turns: "выключи свет в спальне" asked "Что сделать?",
and "кто изобрёл телефон" was scored as an answer to it, then "как
дела" after that. Nothing tested whether the words could be an answer.
The test is two offline token checks that already existed for other
callers: a question shape, or a capture verb. It fires only where the
answer filled nothing, so an answer that closes the gap still lands
whatever shape it has, and the retry budget is untouched — the count
was never the problem.
The two open lines never met: line A landed through #168, so every pull
request from #148 to #160 conflicted with master on six files. This
reconciles them.
Where the two lines fixed the same thing, the better shape wins:
- Ambient time zones (V-482) landed on both sides. Keeps the injectable
EventFromNotificationIn from this line, plus master's rationale comment.
Drops master's forced n.Posted.In(time.Local), which defeated the loc
argument.
- tick.go: master's guardNudge call and say.CountWord edits, moved onto the
split files this line created. The digest summary now declines through
say.CountWord inside tick_digest.go.
- voice.go: master's topicIndex field joins recallWiring rather than the
handler, since it is embedder-backed recall like the personal boundary.
topics.go and its test read h.recall.topics now.
- mavweb: master's capability and risk columns ported into tools.html, which
is where this line moved the markup. The Go const is gone.
- Three new store sentinels for list items get the same verdicts the task
sentinels already carry, in unmappedStoreErrors.
make build: 12 binaries. make test: green. make fmt-check: clean.
--no-verify: a merge of two long lines cannot fit the 300-line budget.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The review comment asked for basic DI. The answer is the idiom voice.go
already had for capabilities — a cohesive *Wiring struct — applied to a
group that is not a capability toggle, plus the decision written down so
it is a rule and not a habit.
recallWiring holds the embedder, the vector store, the personal boundary
and the two numbers that gate an answer. They sat in three places on
reactiveHandler, with the gate numbers a hundred lines from the store
they gate. Its zero value means no recall, so it is a value, not a
pointer like the optional-capability groups.
dataStore stays out of it. patterns.go, ecosystem_acts.go and confirm.go
use it, so it is not part of this cluster.
docs/handler-wiring.md records the choice, rejects a container or a
wire-style generator outright, defers narrow per-handler interfaces to
the package split that would justify them, and states the constraint the
task named: a wiring change does not ride a feature PR.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Every clarify turn said one sentence per gap, and a re-ask repeated it word
for word. A question he already failed to answer is the worst one to ask
again unchanged: the second wording is what tells him which part she missed.
clarifytemplates.go holds three wordings per slot, picked by attempt rather
than at random — short first, then naming the gap, then spelling it out with
an example. Past the end she keeps the most explicit one instead of wrapping
back to the short question he has already not answered.
The intents with nothing identifiable to ask about (note, query, chat,
system) kept the stub's single "не совсем поняла — можешь переформулировать?",
which is the line he hears whenever she misses him completely. Four wordings
now, picked by a hash of the utterance so one question asked twice reads the
same and two different misses do not.
Still no model call on this path: the resident model would wander, and this
text has to be right every time. No schema_version either, unlike the nudge
templates — these are Go constants, so no file can drift out of step with the
code that reads it. The persona test already in clarify_test.go covers the
new lines.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two of the four defects on the task.
The stored payload was the whole utterance, so /reminders and the agenda
recited "напомни завтра в 9 утра выпить таблетки" where the reminder is
"выпить таблетки". The marker is an instruction that was already carried out
and the hour is already a column, so reminderBody strips both, and falls back
to the unstripped body whenever stripping would leave nothing — a reminder
that fires and says nothing is worse than a wordy one.
The page rendered the raw {"text":...} envelope and the UTC instant. Both are
now done in mavweb: reminderRows unwraps the payload and formats through
Local(). The unwrap is a copy of store.ReminderText rather than a call to it,
because mavweb builds without CGO and internal/store carries the sqlite
driver — the ipc DTOs are decoupled from the store on purpose.
TestClarifySubjectAnswerFillsRatherThanClobbers asserted the hour survived as
a word in the payload. It now asserts the fire time, which is where the hour
lives.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The decision, not a behaviour change: ClarifyStore stays in memory, and she
does not announce the loss either.
The TTL and the attempt count measure a pause in one conversation. A restart
is a gap of unknown length, so a restored question is either dead already or
lying about its age, and the request behind it is one he has likely given up
on. Announcing it would mean storing a marker that outlives the thing it
describes, to say one sentence in the rare window where he speaks within 90s
of a restart. His next words route fresh, which is right either way.
Written down in docs/design.md, pinned at both ends by a comment, and held by
a test that builds a second handler over the same store.
The clarify store had one key for the whole daemon, so a question asked in
the web chat and never answered captured the next three utterances from any
source — telegram, or the mic — and answered them against a request the
speaker never made.
The reach now supplies a conversation id on the IPC Chat call, and the
daemon carries it on the context the way it already carries the correlation
id, so the six clarify call sites read it instead of a constant. The mic has
no id of its own and keeps the key it had, so voice behaves exactly as
before. mavweb has no per-browser session, so every tab is one conversation:
right for a single-owner box, and still distinct from telegram and the mic.
Dialogue sessions stay global on purpose — they are what she remembers about
him, not what she is waiting for from one channel.
Slots.Text was the raw utterance for every intent, so a reminder could not
have an empty subject. StillMissing never reported SlotText, the question
"О чём напомнить?" was unaskable, and the branch in PendingQuestion.Answer
that fills a text slot could only overwrite the whole request.
The LLM path now keeps the model's own text, empty included, and the gate
turns a subjectless reminder into a question. The classifier path is
unchanged: it has no subject parser, so the utterance is the only signal it
has.
clarifyExpiredVariants and clarifyGaveUp are hand-written Russian that the
phrasing eval never sees, because they never pass through the phraser. They
carry feminine self-reference and a plain imperative, and they are the lines a
later edit reaches for a synonym in. A table test now runs the eval's own
feminine, his-gender, address and cringe checks over them and over
clarifyQuestions. The apology clause of the cringe check is skipped with its
reason written down: it exists so a greenlit nudge is not undercut, and a reply
to a request she failed to parse is the opposite case.
Also two notes and no behaviour change. announceProposal now says what its
cooldown does and does not do: detectAndPropose returns non-nil only for a newly
created row, so the first tick over a populated history announces one pattern
and silences the rest permanently, and the cooldown only spaces genuinely new
pairs found later. A queue would be needed for "one per day until each is
mentioned". The duplicated Cooldown default is explained as cover for a tickLoop
built in a test without going through Load. The -reembed flag help says the
daemon does not answer until the backfill finishes.
Found in review of #50, #54.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TrVSBKe3RFDF4fGYKWYQnX
runTurn computed the notice at step 2, after the confirm check had already
returned. So he could be asked a question, walk off until it expired, come back
and say "да" to a confirm that was still parked. The confirm answered and he
never heard that the older request had been let go, even though the store had
dropped it. Every other exit from runTurn carries the notice.
The notice is now taken first and every early return wraps in withNotice,
including the clarify answer path, where it is empty in practice because one
dialogue id holds one question.
Found in review of #50.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TrVSBKe3RFDF4fGYKWYQnX
wantedSlots says a reminder needs both a subject and a time, but askClarify
parks only the first gap, because she asks about one thing per turn. When both
were missing the second gap was never revisited. "напомни" with no subject and
no time asked "О чём напомнить?", accepted "позвонить маме", then handed
applyAction a reminder with no time, which answered "не получилось разобрать
время напоминания." That is a parse error for a question she never asked.
A filled gap now re-enters the clarify loop for whatever wantedSlots still
names, one question per turn as before, spending the same attempt budget so the
exchange stays bounded. The answered subject is also folded into the raw
utterance, because actionReminder stores the utterance as the payload and a
reminder clarified out of a bare "напомни" would otherwise fire saying nothing.
Found in review of #50.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TrVSBKe3RFDF4fGYKWYQnX
Wording fixes from the review of the clarify + phrasing PRs.
- "На когда напомнить?" → "Когда?". After she has just been asked something,
the long form is the phrasing of a form field, not of a person.
- A reminder now wants a subject as well as a time. "напомни в 11" had a time
and nothing to say at 11, and she asked nothing at all — she now asks
"О чём напомнить?". Subject first, since a reminder with no subject is not
worth setting.
- The expiry notice is five phrasings picked at random instead of one fixed
sentence. It is the line he hears every time he walks off mid-request, so it
is the line that repeats most.
- The nudge prompt's ban on "обращения" is now "ласковые обращения". It was
meant to forbid "милый"/"дорогой", not his name — "Ками, ноутбук на трёх
процентах" is how she talks, and the eval's cringe check already only flags
pet names.
- The nudge example no longer claims she plugged the laptop in. She has no
hands and no smart plug; an example where she acts teaches the model to
invent actions Maven never took.
- replySystem: "тепло" → "спокойно и без официальных формулировок". A one-word
mood instruction a 1.7B can't act on, replaced with the behaviour meant.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
An unclear answer used to end the request on the spot. Now she re-asks the same
question while attempts remain, and when they run out she says
"Прости, я не поняла. Скажи, пожалуйста, по-другому." — silence would leave him
thinking it was handled. Same reply when the missing slot has no question to
ask, and as a floor in finishClarified so an empty reply can never ship.
Tests: three questions allowed, the fourth gives up out loud, the cap is
configurable, and a restated time is the one that lands.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Covers: a reminder with no time is asked about and completes on the answer; the
same for a fact; an answer past the TTL falls through as a fresh utterance; a
second unclear answer drops the request with no second question; a clarified act
off the allowlist neither runs nor gets enabled; a clarified destructive act
still parks a confirm; noise keeps the canned reply. No model, no network.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
claude
kami