Merge the accepted-routine fix and drop reminder_id from accept

Two merge fixes on top of the branch:

- migrations: keep both new steps, snooze stays #8, the routine columns
  become #9. Both agents had numbered theirs #8.
- accepting no longer takes a reminder id, on the web surface too. The
  web accept path had the same one-shot-reminder bug the voice path did,
  so both now just flip the status and let the tick loop schedule.

The test that asserted "accept creates a reminder and links it" asserted
the bug. It now asserts that accepting creates no reminder.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ

cmd/mavend/main.go

@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ func (l *lockedAPI) ListProposedRoutines(ctx context.Context) ([]ipc.ProposedRou
 	return nil, errLocked
 }
 func (l *lockedAPI) DismissProposedRoutine(ctx context.Context, id int64) error { return errLocked }
-func (l *lockedAPI) AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx context.Context, id, remID int64) error {
+func (l *lockedAPI) AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx context.Context, id int64) error {
 	return errLocked
 }
 func (l *lockedAPI) LookupTool(ctx context.Context, name string) (ipc.Tool, error) {

cmd/mavend/tick.go

@@ -186,6 +186,10 @@ func (t *tickLoop) tick(ctx context.Context, now time.Time) {
 	// LLM-phrased — so a routine can't hallucinate. severity comes from config.
 	t.fireRoutines(ctx, now, state)
 
+	// accepted routines: patterns the user confirmed. read straight from the
+	// store each tick so the schedule survives a restart.
+	t.fireAcceptedRoutines(ctx, now, state)
+
 	// morning routines: daily checklists (medicine/water/pets/...), nagged at
 	// most once per day per routine, and only for items still unevidenced at
 	// nudge time. See internal/morning for the "why not four timers" rationale.
@@ -377,6 +381,64 @@ func (t *tickLoop) fireRoutines(ctx context.Context, now time.Time, state loop.S
 	}
 }
 
+// fireAcceptedRoutines nudges about the routines the user accepted, once per
+// interval (Vikunja #366). Accepting used to create a single reminder, so a
+// non-weekly routine fired once and went quiet forever; the schedule lives in
+// the proposed_routines row now and the loop re-reads it every tick.
+//
+// A routine is a care-class nudge and goes through the restraint gate like any
+// other: quiet hours, away presence and snooze all suppress it. Reminders bypass
+// that gate; routines must not. A suppressed nudge is NOT marked fired, so it
+// goes out on the next tick that the gate allows — one nudge, held, not dropped
+// and not repeated.
+//
+// The body is literal text built from the detected action and object, not
+// LLM-phrased, so a routine can't hallucinate. It nudges; it never acts.
+func (t *tickLoop) fireAcceptedRoutines(ctx context.Context, now time.Time, state loop.State) {
+	rows, err := t.store.ListAcceptedRoutines(ctx)
+	if err != nil {
+		log.Printf("tick: list accepted routines: %v", err)
+		return
+	}
+	accepted := make([]routine.Accepted, 0, len(rows))
+	for _, r := range rows {
+		if r.AcceptedTs == nil {
+			continue // accepted before the schedule column existed — no clock to start from.
+		}
+		accepted = append(accepted, routine.Accepted{
+			ID:           r.ID,
+			Name:         r.Action + " " + r.Object,
+			IntervalDays: r.IntervalDays,
+			Accepted:     *r.AcceptedTs,
+			LastFired:    r.LastFiredTs,
+		})
+	}
+
+	for _, a := range routine.DueAccepted(accepted, now) {
+		rule := loop.Rule{Name: "routine:" + a.Name, Severity: loop.Sev1}
+		if !loop.Gate(state, rule) {
+			continue
+		}
+		body := "пора: " + a.Name
+		pn := delivery.PhrasedNudge{
+			Candidate: loop.Candidate{Rule: rule, Severity: rule.Severity, State: state},
+			Body:      body,
+			Summary:   body,
+		}
+		sent, err := t.dispatcher.DispatchNudge(ctx, pn, now)
+		if err != nil {
+			log.Printf("tick: dispatch accepted routine %d: %v", a.ID, err)
+			continue
+		}
+		if len(sent) == 0 {
+			continue // routing dropped it — leave it due.
+		}
+		if err := t.store.MarkRoutineFired(ctx, a.ID, now); err != nil {
+			log.Printf("tick: mark routine %d fired: %v", a.ID, err)
+		}
+	}
+}
+
 // fireMorningRoutines checks each configured checklist against today's facts
 // and dispatches a nag listing exactly what's still missing, at most once per
 // routine per calendar day. Fact reads happen here (not in loop.Gatherer)

cmd/mavend/tick_test.go

@@ -96,6 +96,115 @@ func TestTickFiresRoutineWhenScheduleCrosses(t *testing.T) {
 	}
 }
 
+// TestTickFiresAcceptedRoutineEveryInterval — Vikunja #366. An accepted routine
+// with a 3-day interval must nudge every 3 days, not once. It also must not
+// replay the occurrences it slept through: after a 30-day gap it nudges once.
+func TestTickFiresAcceptedRoutineEveryInterval(t *testing.T) {
+	st := newTestStore(t)
+	ctx := context.Background()
+	accepted := refNow()
+
+	id, err := st.CreateProposedRoutine(ctx, "полить", "цветы", 3.0, accepted)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("CreateProposedRoutine: %v", err)
+	}
+	if err := st.AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx, id, accepted); err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("AcceptProposedRoutine: %v", err)
+	}
+
+	sink := &fakeSink{}
+	tl := newTestTickLoop(t, st, sink, nil)
+	const rule = "routine:полить цветы"
+
+	// Same day as the accept: not due yet.
+	markPresent(t, st, ctx, accepted)
+	tl.tick(ctx, accepted.Add(time.Hour))
+	if n := countSends(sink, rule); n != 0 {
+		t.Fatalf("routine fired %d times before its first interval passed, want 0", n)
+	}
+
+	// Three days later: the first nudge.
+	first := accepted.Add(3 * 24 * time.Hour)
+	markPresent(t, st, ctx, first)
+	tl.tick(ctx, first)
+	if n := countSends(sink, rule); n != 1 {
+		t.Fatalf("first interval: sends = %d, want 1", n)
+	}
+
+	// Next day: still inside the interval, silent.
+	sink.sends = nil
+	markPresent(t, st, ctx, first.Add(24*time.Hour))
+	tl.tick(ctx, first.Add(24*time.Hour))
+	if n := countSends(sink, rule); n != 0 {
+		t.Fatalf("mid-interval: sends = %d, want 0", n)
+	}
+
+	// Three days after the first nudge: it fires again. This is the bug —
+	// a one-shot reminder would never come back.
+	second := first.Add(3 * 24 * time.Hour)
+	markPresent(t, st, ctx, second)
+	tl.tick(ctx, second)
+	if n := countSends(sink, rule); n != 1 {
+		t.Fatalf("second interval: sends = %d, want 1 (a routine repeats)", n)
+	}
+
+	// A long silence must not turn into a backlog of missed nudges.
+	sink.sends = nil
+	late := second.Add(30 * 24 * time.Hour)
+	markPresent(t, st, ctx, late)
+	tl.tick(ctx, late)
+	if n := countSends(sink, rule); n != 1 {
+		t.Fatalf("after a 30-day gap: sends = %d, want exactly 1 (no backlog)", n)
+	}
+}
+
+// TestTickAcceptedRoutineRespectsQuietHours — routines are not reminders: they
+// do not inherit the reminder gate bypass. Away presence drops a care-class
+// nudge, and the routine stays due so it nudges once the user is back.
+func TestTickAcceptedRoutineRespectsGate(t *testing.T) {
+	st := newTestStore(t)
+	ctx := context.Background()
+	accepted := refNow()
+
+	id, err := st.CreateProposedRoutine(ctx, "полить", "цветы", 3.0, accepted)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("CreateProposedRoutine: %v", err)
+	}
+	if err := st.AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx, id, accepted); err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("AcceptProposedRoutine: %v", err)
+	}
+
+	sink := &fakeSink{}
+	tl := newTestTickLoop(t, st, sink, nil)
+	const rule = "routine:полить цветы"
+
+	// No presence probes at all ⇒ away ⇒ the care gate blocks the nudge.
+	due := accepted.Add(3 * 24 * time.Hour)
+	tl.tick(ctx, due)
+	if n := countSends(sink, rule); n != 0 {
+		t.Fatalf("away: sends = %d, want 0 (routine must not bypass the gate)", n)
+	}
+
+	// Back at the desk a minute later: the nudge that was held now goes out.
+	back := due.Add(time.Minute)
+	markPresent(t, st, ctx, back)
+	tl.tick(ctx, back)
+	if n := countSends(sink, rule); n != 1 {
+		t.Fatalf("present again: sends = %d, want 1", n)
+	}
+}
+
+// countSends counts captured sends for one rule name.
+func countSends(sink *fakeSink, rule string) int {
+	n := 0
+	for _, s := range sink.sends {
+		if s.RuleName == rule {
+			n++
+		}
+	}
+	return n
+}
+
 // refNow — fixed tick time so presence decay + since durations are deterministic.
 func refNow() time.Time { return time.Date(2026, 6, 30, 12, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC) }
 

cmd/mavend/voice.go

@@ -1421,23 +1421,12 @@ func (h *reactiveHandler) resolveConfirm(ctx context.Context, text string) (stri
 		switch classifyConfirm(text) {
 		case confirmYes:
 			h.pendingRoutine = nil
-			// Create a recurring reminder at the detected interval.
-			// Weekly patterns get a cron expression; arbitrary intervals
-			// fire once and the detector re-proposes on the next cycle.
-			intervalDur := time.Duration(pr.interval * 24 * float64(time.Hour))
-			fire := h.now().Add(intervalDur)
-			cron := ""
-			if pr.interval >= 6.5 && pr.interval <= 7.5 {
-				cron = fmt.Sprintf("0 %d * * %d", fire.Hour(), int(fire.Weekday()))
-			}
-			payload := fmt.Sprintf(`{"text":"%s %s"}`, pr.action, pr.object)
-			remID, err := h.api.CreateReminder(ctx, fire, payload, cron)
-			if err != nil {
-				log.Printf("voice: create routine reminder: %v", err)
-				return "не получилось поставить напоминание.", true
-			}
-			if err := h.dataStore.AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx, pr.routineID, remID); err != nil {
+			// Only record the acceptance. The tick loop reads accepted
+			// routines and nudges on their own interval. Building a reminder
+			// here made a routine fire exactly once (Vikunja #366).
+			if err := h.dataStore.AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx, pr.routineID, h.now()); err != nil {
 				log.Printf("voice: accept proposed routine: %v", err)
+				return "не получилось запомнить рутину.", true
 			}
 			return "буду напоминать.", true
 		case confirmNo:

cmd/mavweb/handlers_test.go

@@ -928,7 +928,6 @@ type routineCore struct {
 	routines   []ipc.ProposedRoutine
 	dismissed  int64
 	acceptedID int64
-	acceptedRe int64
 	remCron    string
 }
 
@@ -941,8 +940,8 @@ func (c *routineCore) DismissProposedRoutine(_ context.Context, id int64) error
 	return nil
 }
 
-func (c *routineCore) AcceptProposedRoutine(_ context.Context, id, remID int64) error {
-	c.acceptedID, c.acceptedRe = id, remID
+func (c *routineCore) AcceptProposedRoutine(_ context.Context, id int64) error {
+	c.acceptedID = id
 	return nil
 }
 
@@ -990,18 +989,22 @@ func TestHandleRoutines_Accept_RequiresStepUp(t *testing.T) {
 	}
 }
 
-func TestHandleRoutines_Accept_CreatesReminderAndLinksIt(t *testing.T) {
+// Accepting only flips the status. It used to also create a one-shot reminder,
+// which is why a non-weekly routine fired once and then went quiet forever
+// (Vikunja #366). The tick loop owns the schedule now, so a reminder here would
+// be a second, competing schedule.
+func TestHandleRoutines_Accept_FlipsStatusAndMakesNoReminder(t *testing.T) {
 	core := weeklyRoutineCore()
 	rr := httptest.NewRecorder()
 	handleRoutines(rr, postRoutine("accept", "3"), core, stepUpSession(), false)
 	if rr.Code != http.StatusOK {
 		t.Fatalf("status = %d, want 200; body=%s", rr.Code, rr.Body.String())
 	}
-	if core.acceptedID != 3 || core.acceptedRe != 77 {
-		t.Fatalf("accepted id=%d reminder=%d, want 3 and 77", core.acceptedID, core.acceptedRe)
+	if core.acceptedID != 3 {
+		t.Fatalf("accepted id = %d, want 3", core.acceptedID)
 	}
-	if core.remCron == "" {
-		t.Fatal("a weekly pattern should get a cron expression")
+	if core.remCron != "" {
+		t.Fatalf("accepting must not create a reminder, got cron %q", core.remCron)
 	}
 }
 

cmd/mavweb/main.go

@@ -898,20 +898,11 @@ func acceptRoutine(ctx context.Context, core ipc.CoreAPI, id int64) error {
 		return errors.New("no such proposed routine")
 	}
 
-	fire := time.Now().Add(time.Duration(found.IntervalDays * 24 * float64(time.Hour)))
-	cron := ""
-	if found.IntervalDays >= 6.5 && found.IntervalDays <= 7.5 {
-		cron = fmt.Sprintf("0 %d * * %d", fire.Hour(), int(fire.Weekday()))
-	}
-	payload, err := json.Marshal(map[string]string{"text": found.Action + " " + found.Object})
-	if err != nil {
-		return err
-	}
-	remID, err := core.CreateReminder(ctx, fire, string(payload), cron)
-	if err != nil {
-		return err
-	}
-	return core.AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx, id, remID)
+	// No reminder is created here. Accepting only flips the status; the tick
+	// loop reads accepted routines and nudges on the interval (Vikunja #366).
+	// The old code made a one-shot reminder, so a non-weekly routine fired
+	// once and then went quiet forever.
+	return core.AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx, id)
 }
 
 func handleTrace(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, core ipc.CoreAPI) {

internal/auth/auth_test.go

@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ func (r *recordingAPI) RevertFact(_ context.Context, _ string) (int64, error) {
 func (r *recordingAPI) ListProposedRoutines(_ context.Context) ([]ipc.ProposedRoutine, error) {
 	return nil, nil
 }
-func (r *recordingAPI) AcceptProposedRoutine(_ context.Context, _, _ int64) error {
+func (r *recordingAPI) AcceptProposedRoutine(_ context.Context, _ int64) error {
 	return nil
 }
 func (r *recordingAPI) DismissProposedRoutine(_ context.Context, _ int64) error {

internal/ipc/api.go

@@ -238,8 +238,7 @@ type dismissProposedRoutineReq struct {
 }
 
 type acceptProposedRoutineReq struct {
-	ID         int64 `json:"id"`
-	ReminderID int64 `json:"reminder_id"`
+	ID int64 `json:"id"`
 }
 
 // CoreAPI — what core exposes to modules. One Go interface, satisfied by:
@@ -291,9 +290,9 @@ type CoreAPI interface {
 	ListProposedRoutines(ctx context.Context) ([]ProposedRoutine, error)
 	// DismissProposedRoutine flips a proposed routine to 'dismissed'.
 	DismissProposedRoutine(ctx context.Context, id int64) error
-	// AcceptProposedRoutine flips a proposed routine to 'accepted' and links
-	// the reminder that will fire it. The caller creates the reminder first.
-	AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx context.Context, id, reminderID int64) error
+	// AcceptProposedRoutine flips a proposed routine to 'accepted'. The tick
+	// loop takes the schedule from there — no reminder is created (Vikunja #366).
+	AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx context.Context, id int64) error
 
 	// TickTrace returns the most recent tick's rule trace. The daemon caches
 	// this after every tick; the store adapter returns an error (trace is not

internal/ipc/client.go

@@ -430,8 +430,8 @@ func (c *Client) DismissProposedRoutine(ctx context.Context, id int64) error {
 	return c.call(ctx, MethodDismissProposedRoutine, dismissProposedRoutineReq{ID: id}, nil)
 }
 
-func (c *Client) AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx context.Context, id, reminderID int64) error {
-	return c.call(ctx, MethodAcceptProposedRoutine, acceptProposedRoutineReq{ID: id, ReminderID: reminderID}, nil)
+func (c *Client) AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx context.Context, id int64) error {
+	return c.call(ctx, MethodAcceptProposedRoutine, acceptProposedRoutineReq{ID: id}, nil)
 }
 
 func (c *Client) Chat(ctx context.Context, text string) (string, error) {

internal/ipc/ipc_test.go

@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ func (a *chatTestAPI) DeleteTool(ctx context.Context, name string) error {
 func (a *chatTestAPI) ListProposedRoutines(ctx context.Context) ([]ProposedRoutine, error) {
 	return nil, ErrUnknownMethod
 }
-func (a *chatTestAPI) AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx context.Context, id, remID int64) error {
+func (a *chatTestAPI) AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx context.Context, id int64) error {
 	return nil
 }
 func (a *chatTestAPI) DismissProposedRoutine(ctx context.Context, id int64) error {

internal/ipc/server.go

@@ -253,8 +253,8 @@ func (a *storeAPI) DismissProposedRoutine(ctx context.Context, id int64) error {
 	return mapErr(a.s.DismissProposedRoutine(ctx, id))
 }
 
-func (a *storeAPI) AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx context.Context, id, reminderID int64) error {
-	return mapErr(a.s.AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx, id, reminderID))
+func (a *storeAPI) AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx context.Context, id int64) error {
+	return mapErr(a.s.AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx, id, time.Now().UTC()))
 }
 
 func toTool(t store.Tool) Tool {
@@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ func (s *Server) dispatch(ctx context.Context, req Request) (json.RawMessage, er
 		if err := unmarshalParams(req.Params, &p); err != nil {
 			return nil, err
 		}
-		return marshalResult(nil), api.AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx, p.ID, p.ReminderID)
+		return marshalResult(nil), api.AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx, p.ID)
 
 	case MethodRevertFact:
 		var p struct {

internal/router/llmrouter.go

@@ -23,17 +23,27 @@ func NewLLMRouter(c Completer) *LLMRouter { return &LLMRouter{c: c} }
 
 // routeGrammar — GBNF constraining the model to a JSON ARRAY of fixed-shape
 // action objects (one per ask; compound utterances → multiple). Enum + key set
-// prevent free-form drift from a sub-1B model.
+// prevent free-form drift from a sub-1B model. The string rule is length-bounded
+// so a repetition loop cannot fill the whole token budget with one field and
+// truncate the JSON.
 const routeGrammar = `
 root   ::= "[" ws action ("," ws action)* ws "]"
 action ::= "{" ws "\"intent\"" ws ":" ws intent ("," ws field)* ws "}"
 intent ::= "\"fact\"" | "\"reminder\"" | "\"note\"" | "\"query\"" | "\"act\"" | "\"chat\"" | "\"system\""
 field  ::= key ws ":" ws string
 key    ::= "\"key\"" | "\"value\"" | "\"text\"" | "\"verb\""
-string ::= "\"" ([^"\\] | "\\" .)* "\""
+string ::= "\"" ([^"\\] | "\\" .){0,120} "\""
 ws     ::= [ \t\n]*
 `
 
+// routeSystem — the router prompt. Changed 31-07-2026: the query test now sits
+// above the fact test and there is an explicit question test. Before that, a
+// question naming a fact key ("сколько воды я выпил с утра") matched the fact
+// rule first and was stored as an assertion — 15 of 76 fixture cases.
+//
+// The training workspace keeps its own copy of this prompt for relabelling, and
+// `llm/check_prompt_parity.py` there compares the two. That copy is in another
+// repo and was not touched, so parity will fail until it gets the same edit.
 const routeSystem = `Классифицируй ровно одно сообщение пользователя. Верни ОДИН JSON-массив действий.
 
 Ровно одно намерение: fact, reminder, note, query, act, chat, system.
@@ -41,22 +51,26 @@ const routeSystem = `Классифицируй ровно одно сообще
 Классифицируй по цели пользователя. Порядок решения:
 1. Хочет напоминание в будущем → reminder
 2. Явно просит сохранить информацию → note
-3. Сообщает или обновляет текущее состояние/событие → fact
-4. Хочет получить информацию → query
-5. Просит выполнить работу → act
-6. Про ассистента, настройки или память → system
-7. Иначе → chat
+3. Задаёт вопрос: есть вопросительное слово (сколько, что, какой, когда, где, кто, почему, как) или знак «?» → query
+4. Хочет получить информацию, в том числе о своих же данных → query
+5. Утверждает: сообщает или обновляет текущее состояние/событие → fact
+6. Просит выполнить работу → act
+7. Про ассистента, настройки или память → system
+8. Иначе → chat
 
 Различия:
 - note — сохранить информацию, без напоминания. text = суть.
 - reminder — уведомить позже. text = что напомнить.
 - fact — неявное обновление: пользователь сообщает, что что-то в мире изменилось (текущее/изменённое состояние, случившееся событие). key/value.
+- query против fact — решает форма реплики, а не тема. Вопрос о состоянии — это query, даже если названо то же самое, что бывает в fact. Только утверждение — это fact.
 
 Примеры:
 "запиши пароль" → {"intent":"note","text":"пароль"}
 "напомни купить молоко" → {"intent":"reminder","text":"купить молоко"}
 "запиши купить молоко" → {"intent":"note","text":"купить молоко"}
 "я выпил воду" → {"intent":"fact","key":"water","value":"выпил"}
+"сколько воды я выпил с утра" → {"intent":"query","text":"сколько воды я выпил с утра"}
+"сколько раз я ел вчера?" → {"intent":"query","text":"сколько раз я ел вчера"}
 "мой любимый фильм — Интерстеллар" → {"intent":"note","text":"любимый фильм — Интерстеллар"}
 "что такое docker?" → {"intent":"query","text":"что такое docker"}
 "напиши письмо" → {"intent":"act","verb":"написать письмо"}
@@ -65,6 +79,11 @@ const routeSystem = `Классифицируй ровно одно сообще
 
 Ответ — JSON-массив: по одному объекту на каждую просьбу. Обычно один. Если в реплике несколько просьб — по объекту на каждую. "напомни купить молоко, и запиши что кофе кончился" → [{"intent":"reminder","text":"купить молоко"},{"intent":"note","text":"кофе кончился"}]. Только JSON, без пояснений.`
 
+// routeRepeatPenalty — the sub-1B model loops one sentence inside the text field
+// until it runs out of tokens, which truncates the JSON. 1.15 is enough to break
+// the loop without hurting short slot values.
+const routeRepeatPenalty = 1.15
+
 type routeAction struct {
 	Intent string `json:"intent"`
 	Key    string `json:"key"`
@@ -74,7 +93,13 @@ type routeAction struct {
 }
 
 func (lr *LLMRouter) Route(ctx context.Context, utterance string, now time.Time) (Decision, bool, error) {
-	raw, err := lr.c.Complete(ctx, llm.Req{System: routeSystem, User: utterance, Grammar: routeGrammar, MaxTokens: 128})
+	raw, err := lr.c.Complete(ctx, llm.Req{
+		System:        routeSystem,
+		User:          utterance,
+		Grammar:       routeGrammar,
+		MaxTokens:     128,
+		RepeatPenalty: routeRepeatPenalty,
+	})
 	if err != nil {
 		return Decision{}, false, err
 	}

internal/router/llmrouter_test.go

@@ -3,15 +3,61 @@ package router
 import (
 	"context"
 	"fmt"
+	"strings"
 	"testing"
 	"time"
 
 	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/llm"
 )
 
-type mockLLM struct{ out string; err error }
+type mockLLM struct {
+	out string
+	err error
+	got *llm.Req // last request, when the test wants to inspect it
+}
 
-func (m mockLLM) Complete(_ context.Context, _ llm.Req) (string, error) { return m.out, m.err }
+func (m mockLLM) Complete(_ context.Context, r llm.Req) (string, error) {
+	if m.got != nil {
+		*m.got = r
+	}
+	return m.out, m.err
+}
+
+// Without a repeat penalty the model loops inside the text field until MaxTokens
+// and the truncated JSON fails to parse.
+func TestLLMRouterSetsRepeatPenalty(t *testing.T) {
+	var got llm.Req
+	lr := NewLLMRouter(mockLLM{out: `{"intent":"chat","text":"привет"}`, got: &got})
+	if _, _, err := lr.Route(context.Background(), "привет", time.Now()); err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("route: %v", err)
+	}
+	if got.RepeatPenalty <= 1 {
+		t.Fatalf("want repeat penalty above 1, got %v", got.RepeatPenalty)
+	}
+}
+
+// An unbounded string rule lets one field eat the whole token budget.
+func TestRouteGrammarBoundsStrings(t *testing.T) {
+	if !strings.Contains(routeGrammar, `string ::= "\"" ([^"\\] | "\\" .){0,120} "\""`) {
+		t.Fatal("grammar string rule lost its length bound")
+	}
+}
+
+// A question naming a fact key used to be stored as a fact because the fact rule
+// was tested first. Keep the query rule above it.
+func TestRoutePromptTestsQueryBeforeFact(t *testing.T) {
+	query := strings.Index(routeSystem, "→ query")
+	fact := strings.Index(routeSystem, "состояние/событие → fact")
+	if query < 0 || fact < 0 {
+		t.Fatalf("prompt lost a rule: query=%d fact=%d", query, fact)
+	}
+	if query > fact {
+		t.Fatal("query rule must come before the fact rule")
+	}
+	if !strings.Contains(routeSystem, "Задаёт вопрос") {
+		t.Fatal("prompt lost the explicit question test")
+	}
+}
 
 func TestLLMRouterFactMapping(t *testing.T) {
 	lr := NewLLMRouter(mockLLM{out: `{"intent":"fact","key":"water","value":"выпил"}`})

internal/routine/routine.go

@@ -55,6 +55,47 @@ func Validate(routines []Routine) error {
 	return nil
 }
 
+// Accepted — an accepted routine proposal as the tick driver sees it. This is a
+// different shape from Routine: the schedule is a plain interval the pattern
+// detector measured, not an operator-written cron expression. Accepted is when
+// the human said yes; LastFired is nil until the first nudge.
+type Accepted struct {
+	ID           int64
+	Name         string
+	IntervalDays float64
+	Accepted     time.Time
+	LastFired    *time.Time
+}
+
+// DueAccepted returns the accepted routines whose interval has passed. It does
+// not mutate anything — the caller persists the new last-fired time, because
+// that has to survive a restart (unlike Due's in-memory map).
+//
+// The clock starts at LastFired, or at Accepted for a routine that has never
+// nudged. A routine with a non-positive interval never fires: a bad interval
+// should mean silence, not a nudge every tick.
+//
+// One occurrence per call, no catch-up: the caller stamps the fire time as now,
+// so a routine that was silent for a month nudges once and then waits a full
+// interval. Never a backlog.
+func DueAccepted(rs []Accepted, now time.Time) []Accepted {
+	var out []Accepted
+	for _, r := range rs {
+		if r.IntervalDays <= 0 {
+			continue
+		}
+		since := r.Accepted
+		if r.LastFired != nil {
+			since = *r.LastFired
+		}
+		gap := time.Duration(r.IntervalDays * 24 * float64(time.Hour))
+		if !now.Before(since.Add(gap)) {
+			out = append(out, r)
+		}
+	}
+	return out
+}
+
 // Due returns the routines whose schedule crossed since their last fire and
 // records now as the new last-fire time for each one returned. The caller owns
 // `last` (the tick driver holds it across ticks); Due mutates it in place.

internal/routine/routine_test.go

@@ -5,6 +5,40 @@ import (
 	"time"
 )
 
+func TestDueAcceptedFiresOncePerInterval(t *testing.T) {
+	accepted := time.Date(2026, 7, 1, 9, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC)
+	fired := accepted.Add(3 * 24 * time.Hour)
+	rs := []Accepted{
+		{ID: 1, Name: "полить цветы", IntervalDays: 3, Accepted: accepted},
+		{ID: 2, Name: "покормить рыб", IntervalDays: 3, Accepted: accepted, LastFired: &fired},
+		{ID: 3, Name: "битый интервал", IntervalDays: 0, Accepted: accepted},
+	}
+
+	// One day in: nothing has waited a full interval.
+	if got := DueAccepted(rs, accepted.Add(24*time.Hour)); len(got) != 0 {
+		t.Fatalf("want nothing due after 1 day, got %+v", got)
+	}
+
+	// Three days in: the never-fired one is due. The one that already fired at
+	// day 3 starts its next three days from there. A zero interval never fires.
+	got := DueAccepted(rs, fired)
+	if len(got) != 1 || got[0].ID != 1 {
+		t.Fatalf("want only routine 1 due at day 3, got %+v", got)
+	}
+
+	// Six days in: both real routines are due.
+	if got := DueAccepted(rs, accepted.Add(6*24*time.Hour)); len(got) != 2 {
+		t.Fatalf("want both routines due at day 6, got %+v", got)
+	}
+
+	// A month later the zero-interval routine is still silent.
+	for _, r := range DueAccepted(rs, accepted.Add(30*24*time.Hour)) {
+		if r.ID == 3 {
+			t.Fatal("a routine with a zero interval must never fire")
+		}
+	}
+}
+
 func TestValidate(t *testing.T) {
 	ok := []Routine{{Name: "morning", Cron: "0 8 * * *", Body: "доброе утро"}}
 	if err := Validate(ok); err != nil {

internal/store/migrations.go

@@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ ALTER TABLE reminders ADD COLUMN next_fire_ts INTEGER;`, // #2
 	CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_facts_resolution_pending ON facts (resolution_state) WHERE resolution_state = 'pending';`, // #7 — entity-aware memory (Vikunja #279): facts about a subject get resolved to a Nexus entity_id async
 
 	`CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_nudges_snoozed ON nudges (outcome_ts) WHERE outcome = 'snoozed';`, // #8 — SnoozedUntil runs every tick; keep it off a full scan (Vikunja #364)
+	`ALTER TABLE proposed_routines ADD COLUMN accepted_ts INTEGER;
+	ALTER TABLE proposed_routines ADD COLUMN last_fired_ts INTEGER;`, // #9 — accepted routines keep firing (Vikunja #366): the tick loop needs to know when a routine was accepted and when it last nudged
 }
 
 // migrate applies every migration with a number greater than the DB's current

internal/store/proposed_routines.go

@@ -16,10 +16,15 @@ const (
 	RoutineDismissed = "dismissed"
 )
 
-// ProposedRoutine — a detected pattern the system wants to turn into a
-// recurring reminder. Status 'proposed' means awaiting human confirmation;
-// 'accepted' means the human confirmed and a reminder was created (reminder_id
-// set); 'dismissed' means the human declined and we won't re-propose.
+// ProposedRoutine — a detected pattern the system wants to nudge about on a
+// repeating interval. Status 'proposed' means awaiting human confirmation;
+// 'accepted' means the human confirmed and the tick loop now owns the schedule;
+// 'dismissed' means the human declined and we won't re-propose.
+//
+// AcceptedTs is when the human said yes; it is the clock start for the first
+// nudge. LastFiredTs is when the last nudge went out, nil until the first one.
+// ReminderID is only set on rows accepted before Vikunja #366, when accepting
+// created a one-shot reminder instead.
 type ProposedRoutine struct {
 	ID           int64
 	Action       string
@@ -27,7 +32,9 @@ type ProposedRoutine struct {
 	IntervalDays float64
 	Status       string // proposed | accepted | dismissed
 	CreatedTs    time.Time
-	ReminderID   *int64 // set when accepted
+	ReminderID   *int64
+	AcceptedTs   *time.Time
+	LastFiredTs  *time.Time
 }
 
 var (
@@ -74,7 +81,7 @@ func (s *Store) CreateProposedRoutine(ctx context.Context, action, object string
 // nil (no error) when no row exists.
 func (s *Store) LookupProposedRoutine(ctx context.Context, action, object string) (*ProposedRoutine, error) {
 	row := s.db.QueryRowContext(ctx, `
-		SELECT id, action, object, interval_days, status, created_ts, reminder_id
+		SELECT id, action, object, interval_days, status, created_ts, reminder_id, accepted_ts, last_fired_ts
 		  FROM proposed_routines
 		 WHERE action = ? AND object = ?`, action, object)
 	r, err := scanProposedRoutine(row)
@@ -95,12 +102,8 @@ func (s *Store) ListProposedRoutines(ctx context.Context) ([]ProposedRoutine, er
 
 // ListProposedRoutinesByStatus returns routines in one status, newest first.
 // An empty status returns every row.
-//
-// TODO(vikunja#46): the tick loop should read the accepted ones from here so a
-// routine the human said yes to has a home the loop can see, instead of only
-// the reminder row that accepting happened to create.
 func (s *Store) ListProposedRoutinesByStatus(ctx context.Context, status string) ([]ProposedRoutine, error) {
-	q := `SELECT id, action, object, interval_days, status, created_ts, reminder_id
+	q := `SELECT id, action, object, interval_days, status, created_ts, reminder_id, accepted_ts, last_fired_ts
 	        FROM proposed_routines`
 	var args []any
 	if status != "" {
@@ -133,15 +136,14 @@ func (s *Store) ListProposedRoutinesByStatus(ctx context.Context, status string)
 // `AND status = 'proposed'` makes the move one-way: an answered proposal can
 // never be answered again.
 //
-// AcceptProposedRoutine flips status to 'accepted', links a reminder_id.
-// Returns error if not in 'proposed' status.
-//
-// TODO(vikunja#46): the /routines page calls this through ipc to flip status
-// from the authed surface.
-func (s *Store) AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx context.Context, id, reminderID int64) error {
+// AcceptProposedRoutine flips status to 'accepted' and records when. From that
+// timestamp the tick loop owns the schedule: it re-reads accepted rows every
+// tick and nudges when the interval has passed. Returns an error if the row is
+// not in 'proposed' status.
+func (s *Store) AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx context.Context, id int64, ts time.Time) error {
 	res, err := s.db.ExecContext(ctx,
-		`UPDATE proposed_routines SET status = 'accepted', reminder_id = ? WHERE id = ? AND status = 'proposed'`,
-		reminderID, id)
+		`UPDATE proposed_routines SET status = 'accepted', accepted_ts = ? WHERE id = ? AND status = 'proposed'`,
+		ts.UnixMilli(), id)
 	if err != nil {
 		return fmt.Errorf("accept proposed routine: %w", err)
 	}
@@ -152,6 +154,42 @@ func (s *Store) AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx context.Context, id, reminderID int64)
 	return nil
 }
 
+// ListAcceptedRoutines returns every accepted routine, oldest first. The tick
+// loop reads this each tick and decides which ones are due.
+func (s *Store) ListAcceptedRoutines(ctx context.Context) ([]ProposedRoutine, error) {
+	rows, err := s.db.QueryContext(ctx, `
+		SELECT id, action, object, interval_days, status, created_ts, reminder_id, accepted_ts, last_fired_ts
+		  FROM proposed_routines
+		 WHERE status = 'accepted'
+		 ORDER BY id`)
+	if err != nil {
+		return nil, fmt.Errorf("list accepted routines: %w", err)
+	}
+	defer rows.Close()
+	var out []ProposedRoutine
+	for rows.Next() {
+		r, err := scanProposedRoutine(rows)
+		if err != nil {
+			return nil, err
+		}
+		out = append(out, r)
+	}
+	return out, rows.Err()
+}
+
+// MarkRoutineFired records that a routine just nudged. The stored time is the
+// nudge time, not the time it was theoretically due, so a routine that was
+// silent for a while starts its next interval from now — missed occurrences are
+// dropped, never replayed as a backlog.
+func (s *Store) MarkRoutineFired(ctx context.Context, id int64, ts time.Time) error {
+	if _, err := s.db.ExecContext(ctx,
+		`UPDATE proposed_routines SET last_fired_ts = ? WHERE id = ?`,
+		ts.UnixMilli(), id); err != nil {
+		return fmt.Errorf("mark routine fired: %w", err)
+	}
+	return nil
+}
+
 // DismissProposedRoutine flips status to 'dismissed'. Idempotent.
 func (s *Store) DismissProposedRoutine(ctx context.Context, id int64) error {
 	_, err := s.db.ExecContext(ctx,
@@ -168,12 +206,24 @@ func scanProposedRoutine(sc scanner) (ProposedRoutine, error) {
 	var r ProposedRoutine
 	var created int64
 	var reminderID sql.NullInt64
-	if err := sc.Scan(&r.ID, &r.Action, &r.Object, &r.IntervalDays, &r.Status, &created, &reminderID); err != nil {
+	var accepted, lastFired sql.NullInt64
+	if err := sc.Scan(&r.ID, &r.Action, &r.Object, &r.IntervalDays, &r.Status, &created, &reminderID, &accepted, &lastFired); err != nil {
 		return ProposedRoutine{}, err
 	}
 	r.CreatedTs = time.UnixMilli(created).UTC()
 	if reminderID.Valid {
 		r.ReminderID = &reminderID.Int64
 	}
+	r.AcceptedTs = millisToTime(accepted)
+	r.LastFiredTs = millisToTime(lastFired)
 	return r, nil
 }
+
+// millisToTime turns a nullable unix-millis column into a *time.Time.
+func millisToTime(v sql.NullInt64) *time.Time {
+	if !v.Valid {
+		return nil
+	}
+	t := time.UnixMilli(v.Int64).UTC()
+	return &t
+}

internal/store/proposed_routines_test.go

@@ -43,12 +43,7 @@ func TestCreateAndAcceptProposedRoutine(t *testing.T) {
 	}
 
 	// Accept
-	// First create a reminder to link
-	remID, err := s.CreateReminder(ctx, now.Add(7*24*time.Hour), `{"text":"refill cat water"}`, "0 10 * * 0")
-	if err != nil {
-		t.Fatalf("CreateReminder: %v", err)
-	}
-	if err := s.AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx, id, remID); err != nil {
+	if err := s.AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx, id, now); err != nil {
 		t.Fatalf("AcceptProposedRoutine: %v", err)
 	}
 
@@ -60,8 +55,50 @@ func TestCreateAndAcceptProposedRoutine(t *testing.T) {
 	if r.Status != "accepted" {
 		t.Fatalf("want status=accepted, got %s", r.Status)
 	}
-	if r.ReminderID == nil || *r.ReminderID != remID {
-		t.Fatalf("want reminder_id=%d, got %v", remID, r.ReminderID)
+	if r.AcceptedTs == nil || !r.AcceptedTs.Equal(now.Truncate(time.Millisecond)) {
+		t.Fatalf("want accepted_ts=%v, got %v", now, r.AcceptedTs)
+	}
+	if r.LastFiredTs != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("a freshly accepted routine has not fired yet, got %v", r.LastFiredTs)
+	}
+}
+
+// TestAcceptedRoutineFiredTimestamp — the tick loop's two reads: the accepted
+// list, and the last-fired stamp it writes back after a nudge.
+func TestAcceptedRoutineFiredTimestamp(t *testing.T) {
+	s := newTestStore(t)
+	ctx := context.Background()
+	now := time.Now().UTC().Truncate(time.Millisecond)
+
+	id, err := s.CreateProposedRoutine(ctx, "полить", "цветы", 3.0, now)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("CreateProposedRoutine: %v", err)
+	}
+	if err := s.AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx, id, now); err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("AcceptProposedRoutine: %v", err)
+	}
+
+	list, err := s.ListAcceptedRoutines(ctx)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("ListAcceptedRoutines: %v", err)
+	}
+	if len(list) != 1 || list[0].ID != id {
+		t.Fatalf("want the one accepted routine, got %+v", list)
+	}
+	if list[0].IntervalDays != 3.0 {
+		t.Fatalf("want interval_days=3, got %v", list[0].IntervalDays)
+	}
+
+	fired := now.Add(3 * 24 * time.Hour)
+	if err := s.MarkRoutineFired(ctx, id, fired); err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("MarkRoutineFired: %v", err)
+	}
+	list, err = s.ListAcceptedRoutines(ctx)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("ListAcceptedRoutines: %v", err)
+	}
+	if list[0].LastFiredTs == nil || !list[0].LastFiredTs.Equal(fired) {
+		t.Fatalf("want last_fired_ts=%v, got %v", fired, list[0].LastFiredTs)
 	}
 }
 
@@ -165,7 +202,7 @@ func TestDismissedProposedRoutineStaysDismissed(t *testing.T) {
 	if err := s.DismissProposedRoutine(ctx, id); err != nil {
 		t.Fatalf("second DismissProposedRoutine: %v", err)
 	}
-	if err := s.AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx, id, 1); !errors.Is(err, ErrProposedRoutineNotFound) {
+	if err := s.AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx, id, time.Now().UTC()); !errors.Is(err, ErrProposedRoutineNotFound) {
 		t.Fatalf("want ErrProposedRoutineNotFound accepting a dismissed routine, got %v", err)
 	}
 	r, err := s.LookupProposedRoutine(ctx, "clean", "litter_box")
@@ -190,11 +227,7 @@ func TestListProposedRoutinesByStatus(t *testing.T) {
 	if err != nil {
 		t.Fatalf("CreateProposedRoutine: %v", err)
 	}
-	remID, err := s.CreateReminder(ctx, now.Add(4*24*time.Hour), `{"text":"water plants"}`, "")
-	if err != nil {
-		t.Fatalf("CreateReminder: %v", err)
-	}
-	if err := s.AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx, keep, remID); err != nil {
+	if err := s.AcceptProposedRoutine(ctx, keep, now); err != nil {
 		t.Fatalf("AcceptProposedRoutine: %v", err)
 	}
 	if err := s.DismissProposedRoutine(ctx, drop); err != nil {