querySources splits in two once you look at which sources over-claimed during
the week of 2026-08-07. The clean ones perform a lookup and can come back
empty: fact-by-key, tasks, list, money, calendar, notes. The dirty ones decide
by cosine against frozen seeds and then answer whatever they claimed, because
they have no lookup that could miss. Weather has no local table at all, which
is why "что такое TCP?" became "для какого города?".
So each source now carries its destination and whether it guesses, and
queryWalk takes the guessers that were not named OUT of the chain. It removes
and never reorders, which is the whole safety argument: the table's order is
load-bearing, every comment on it argues a reason between two sources, and
above all it carries "his data first, then the world". Naming SourceWorld does
not send the turn outside. It stops weather claiming a protocol on the way
past. His notes, his facts and the boundary in front of them still run first,
so a wrong destination costs nothing but the guess it prevented.
The skipped sources are recorded as never-asked with the reason, so /trace
shows a narrowed walk rather than a chain that silently shrank.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A question was sorted twice. The cascade picked one of seven intents with
stage 0 rules, the resident model and the classifier behind it, a 91-case
fixture measuring it and the decision trace recording it. Then IntentQuery
handed the turn to a second dispatch in the daemon, twenty-two branches
deciding by seed similarity in a fixed order, with none of that. The careful
sorter did the easy half.
Decision grows a Source: twelve destinations, not twenty-two, because the
recall passes are one destination from the outside and so are the three world
sources. Empty is a real value and it is the floor — nothing names one, the
daemon walks its whole chain, and that is exactly what shipped before.
Stage 0 fills it where a deterministic rule already knows. Two new world rules
for the shapes measured failing on the box on 2026-08-07: "что такое TCP?" and
"кто такой Линус Торвальдс?" were answered by weather and by the personal
boundary, and "сколько будет 17 на 23?" was answered "для какого города?".
The calendar noun rule and the closed event-noun rule name the calendar. The
possessive agenda rules deliberately do not: "что у меня в списке покупок"
matches agenda-query, and naming the calendar there would take the list off
the turn.
Fixture unchanged at 69/91, which is the point — it scores intent, and none of
these cases changes intent.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
claude