Files
Maven/docs/plans/17-where-the-voice-loop-runs.md
T
claude 86dcd99de2 docs: decide where mavwaked and mavenclient run — not on homesrv (V-463)
They appear in no compose file and run as no host process, and the task
asked whether that is a gap to close or a decision to write down. It is a
decision.

The reason is not hardware. homesrv is a Lenovo laptop and
/proc/asound/cards lists its ACP mic array with capture devices, so
passing /dev/snd into a container would work. It would also listen to an
empty room. A wake-word daemon is worth having where he is standing, and
that is not where the server is.

mavenclient is a client by name and design, mavwaked is the gate in
front of it, and the wire already reaches off-box: ipc.Dial takes
tcp://host:port?token=... through the netaddr seam, with the token
checked before internal/ipc sees the connection. So this needs a machine
and a config line, not protocol work.

The honest consequence is worse than the task suggested, and both docs
now say it: the wake word and the VAD gate are covered by unit tests and
by nothing else. QA session 1 step 2 was reworded to claim only what it
checks, which is push-to-talk through /dash. CLAUDE.md listed all nine
binaries with no column for where they run, which is how this went
unnoticed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 06:11:16 +04:00

61 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown

# Plan: Where mavwaked and mavenclient run
**The decision Vikunja #463 asked for. Written 04-08-2026.**
**Verdict: not in compose on homesrv. They run on a client machine in the room he is in.**
The transport for that already exists and nothing needs building to allow it. What needs
building is a way to check the wake path at all, which is a separate task.
## The state that prompted this
`docker-compose.yml` runs mavend, mavsttd, mavttsd, mavweb and mavpoll. `mavwaked` and
`mavenclient` appear in no compose file and run as no host process. Both build under
`make build`. So the wake word and the voice-activity gate are untested by construction:
QA session 1 step 2 covers push-to-talk from `/dash` only, and #287 (voice session
quality) can never be more than half-answered while this holds.
## The reason is not hardware
homesrv has a microphone. It is a Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro, and `/proc/asound/cards` lists
the ACP digital mic array with capture devices at `/dev/snd/pcmC1D0c` and
`/dev/snd/pcmC2D0c`. Adding `/dev/snd` to compose and joining the `audio` group would
work.
It would also be pointless. A wake-word daemon is worth having in the room he is standing
in. homesrv is a server, so its microphone hears the room the server is in, which is not
where anybody talks to Maven. Wiring audio into a container to listen to an empty room is
work spent on a capability nobody can use.
## The reason it belongs off-box
`mavenclient` is a client by name and by design: microphone, then STT, then core, then
TTS. It is the one binary in the tree meant to run somewhere else. `mavwaked` is the gate
in front of it, so it goes wherever the microphone goes.
Maven already has components that are not containers on homesrv. `mavupdate` is a
host-side tool. The resident model, STT and TTS prefer the workstation and fall back to
homesrv (`docs/offload.md`). Off-box is a shape this system already has.
**And the wire already supports it.** `ipc.Dial` takes a netaddr seam address:
a bare path is the unix socket, and `tcp://host:port?token=...` reaches a core on another
host, with the token checked in `internal/netaddr` before `internal/ipc` sees the
connection. So a client machine reaching mavend over wg or the LAN needs no new protocol
work. It needs mavend to listen on TCP, which `deploy/mavend.json` does not currently ask
for.
## What this means for the QA plan
QA session 1 step 2 should say what it actually covers, which is push-to-talk through
`/dash`. It should not read as though it covers the voice loop. The wake path is checked
on the client machine or it is not checked, and today there is no client machine.
That is the honest state, and it is worse than the task suggests: this is not a
configuration gap that a compose entry closes. Until a machine with a microphone runs
`mavwaked` and `mavenclient` against a TCP-listening mavend, `internal/wake` and
`cmd/mavwaked`'s VAD are covered by their unit tests and by nothing else.
## What was wrong in CLAUDE.md
The daemon table lists all nine binaries with no column for where they run, which is how
this went unnoticed for as long as it did. It now says which two are not on the box.