5815f0b8f37b5af00483429a970fc2e0aa8ca2ff
"что ты умеешь" reached the personal boundary, which claimed it as his and said "не знаю — не нашла у тебя такой записи" about her own description. Letting it past would be no better: SearXNG answers about somebody else's assistant. A self query source above the boundary, reading one frozen description. It is NOT a note — notes are his, and a note about her would come back for "что я записал", would be fed to the digestion worker as something he said, and would be recalled by proximity for questions that are not about her. The description names only what this box does. Everything that depends on config — the house, the LAN, the feeds, the list, weather, telegram — is named as depending on what he allowed, and a test pins that split: inventing a capability here is the same defect as inventing a fact. topicSelf is scored like every other topic, with a narrow keyword floor for the no-embedder case. "что ты умеешь" moved off topicOther, where it had been sitting so an attention question had something to lose to — a phrasing on two sides never clears the margin. TestONNXTopics 38/38 -> 43/43 on held-out utterances.
Description
No description provided
Languages
Go
97.1%
HTML
0.9%
Shell
0.6%
CSS
0.5%
Makefile
0.3%
Other
0.6%