kami
e8941d8ceb
_annotate_speaker_methods stamped `tail`, the highest-trust provenance, on any line whose speaker matched a present local_id, at gemma's confidence of 1.0. No balloon was read. Three of three sampled two-character panels had the speakers swapped, so a multi-character guess is now dropped to unknown, and a solo-panel guess is kept as model_solo at 0.7. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
66 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown
66 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown
# speaker-attribution
|
|
|
|
Limits found by cross-checking the 2026-08-11 chapter run against the panel images.
|
|
|
|
## Nothing attributes a speaker in a multi-character panel {#tail-is-not-geometry}
|
|
|
|
The false `tail` label is gone (`decisions/speaker-attribution.md#no-fake-tail`). What replaced it is a
|
|
refusal, not an answer: with two or more characters present, every speech line now returns `unknown`.
|
|
On a chapter like this one that costs 31 of 81 speech lines their speaker. The narration then falls back
|
|
to a `generic-handle`. That is the honest floor, and it is not the fix.
|
|
|
|
The measurement that forced it, on job `778297bc`, chapter `7c944dd4`. Three two-character panels were
|
|
checked against the art. All three are wrong, each with the two speakers swapped:
|
|
|
|
| panel key | line | truth | pipeline |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| `p010.png` | "…definitely an Egen guy, Seonho!" | the woman | Seonho, the person addressed |
|
|
| `p010.png` | "Y-you think so?" | Seonho | Choi Haeseon |
|
|
| `p012.png` | "Want me to send you the link?" | the woman | the man |
|
|
| `p059.png` | "If team leader Choi says it, it must be true." | the man | Choi Haeseon |
|
|
|
|
The last row needs no image: the line refers to Choi in the third person and is attributed to Choi.
|
|
|
|
The grounded path exists and almost never fires. Only 2 of 81 speech lines got `som_face`, because
|
|
attribution marks need `face_detect` boxes that survive `_pair_faces_to_present`, and these webtoon
|
|
close-ups rarely produce them. Inference, not measured: the face detector was not instrumented.
|
|
|
|
`worker_vision.py:356` already carries the `ponytail:` note that multi-character attribution needs
|
|
per-balloon geometry. `bubble_detect.py:9` records that the `det`/`seg` heads carry balloon fill and
|
|
tail tips and are unused.
|
|
|
|
**Revisit trigger:** the share of narrated lines with a named speaker is the Phase 1 headline metric
|
|
(`ROADMAP.md`). The 30% read on this run counted attributions the sample says are wrong. The next run
|
|
will read lower and will be the first honest number. Raising it means binding a balloon to a speaker
|
|
by tail geometry, using the unused `det`/`seg` heads.
|
|
|
|
## One character id covers two different women {#identity-over-merge}
|
|
|
|
`character_afa7623b` is stored as "black bob, white sweater" and is assigned both to that person
|
|
(`p059.png`) and to the brown-bob green-top coworker (`p010.png`, `p012.png`). It took 25 of the 26
|
|
identity assignments in the chapter, against 113 detected people. Coverage is 23%.
|
|
|
|
**Revisit trigger:** any work on the identity Tier-2 decider. A single id absorbing a whole chapter is
|
|
the signature to watch for.
|
|
|
|
## The character registry carries five weeks of wrong names {#registry-pollution}
|
|
|
|
The registry holds 53 characters for manga `ef105a86`, 41 of them unnamed, with "Kei" three times and
|
|
"Kanade" twice. Kei, Kanade, Zen, Rico, K3, and Watanabe occur zero times in this chapter's text. Only
|
|
Haeseon and Seonho do. `/stage/clear` leaves the per-manga registry intact by design, so every rerun
|
|
inherits the whole pile.
|
|
|
|
**Revisit trigger:** before any run that is meant to produce a clean baseline. Either scope the
|
|
registry to a chapter or add a reviewed reset.
|
|
|
|
## One invented word still halts the chapter {#one-word-halts-chapter}
|
|
|
|
The multi-word name failure is fixed (`decisions/speaker-attribution.md#multiword-cast-names`). The
|
|
blast radius it exposed is not. `run_stage_script` retries a rejected beat once, then raises, so a
|
|
single unsupported token ends the run at that beat. On job `778297bc` one of the 29 lost beats cited
|
|
`['Blur']`, an onomatopoeia the model invented. The verifier was right, and the whole chapter still
|
|
stopped.
|
|
|
|
**Revisit trigger:** the next `unsupported-proper-noun` halt that is a true positive. The likely answer
|
|
is to flag the beat for review and continue, which is `#136` gate work, not a verifier change.
|