pattern: a burst of taps is not a routine (V-468)

Detect had no floor on the interval. Four events minutes apart give gaps
near 0.002 days, every one of them inside the ±50% band, so it proposed a
routine and PhraseRoutine called it "каждый день".

UNIQUE(action, object) makes that unrecoverable: dismissing the bogus
proposal burns the pair, and the real routine behind it can never be
proposed again. It also made hand-QA unsafe — seeding a pattern with four
chat turns poisoned the pair being tested.

The floor is two hours against the median, not a day, because meals, water
and breaks are genuine several-times-a-day habits.

cmd/mavend/capture.go

@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ func (l llmCompleter) Complete(ctx context.Context, system, user string) (string
 // grammar, or a llama-server too old to honour one, gets the plain text it used
 // to get rather than an empty meeting summary.
 func unwrapSummary(raw string) string {
-	s := stripThink(strings.TrimSpace(raw))
+	s := phraser.StripThink(strings.TrimSpace(raw))
 	start := strings.Index(s, "{")
 	end := strings.LastIndex(s, "}")
 	if start < 0 || end <= start {

cmd/mavend/clarify_test.go

@@ -465,3 +465,39 @@ func TestExpiryNoticeSurvivesAConfirmTurn(t *testing.T) {
 		t.Fatal("the expired question must be gone")
 	}
 }
+
+// The other half of the subject question: his answer must fill the empty slot,
+// not replace the request. Slots.Text used to be the whole raw utterance for
+// every intent, so the branch that fills a text slot could only ever overwrite
+// (Vikunja #383). Here the parked request holds the hour and the answer holds
+// what to say at it, and the reminder that lands has both.
+func TestClarifySubjectAnswerFillsRatherThanClobbers(t *testing.T) {
+	ctx := context.Background()
+	h, st, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)
+	at := h.now().Add(2 * time.Hour)
+
+	question, asked := h.askClarify(clarifyDec(router.IntentReminder,
+		router.Slots{Time: at, HasTime: true}, "напомни в 11"))
+	if !asked || question != "О чём напомнить?" {
+		t.Fatalf("expected the subject question, got %q asked=%v", question, asked)
+	}
+
+	reply, handled := h.resolveClarifyAnswer(ctx, "позвонить маме")
+	if !handled {
+		t.Fatal("the answer to an open question must be consumed as an answer")
+	}
+	if reply == clarifyGaveUp {
+		t.Fatalf("a good answer must not drop the request: %q", reply)
+	}
+
+	reminders, err := st.DueReminders(ctx, h.now().Add(48*time.Hour))
+	if err != nil || len(reminders) != 1 {
+		t.Fatalf("clarified reminder was not created: reminders=%v err=%v", reminders, err)
+	}
+	if !strings.Contains(reminders[0].Payload, "маме") {
+		t.Fatalf("the answer never reached the reminder: %q", reminders[0].Payload)
+	}
+	if !strings.Contains(reminders[0].Payload, "11") {
+		t.Fatalf("the answer clobbered the original request: %q", reminders[0].Payload)
+	}
+}

cmd/mavend/replier_llm.go

@@ -2,122 +2,33 @@ package main
 
 import (
 	"context"
-	"encoding/json"
-	"strings"
-	"time"
 
-	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/llm"
-	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/persona"
 	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/phraser"
 	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/router"
 	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/voice"
 )
 
-// completer is the LLM seam for the replier (subset of router.Completer).
-// *llm.Client satisfies it.
-type completer interface {
-	Complete(ctx context.Context, r llm.Req) (string, error)
-}
-
-// llmReplier phrases reactive confirmations with the resident model
-// (Qwen3-1.7B). Stub is the
-// floor on any error (offline-safe). Maven speaks as "she", feminine RU.
+// llmReplier is the daemon-side wiring around phraser.Replier: it owns the
+// deterministic floor, and nothing else. The phrasing itself, the prompt and the
+// output parsing live in internal/phraser so the eval can score them (#396).
 type llmReplier struct {
-	c    completer
+	p    *phraser.Replier
 	stub *voice.StubReplier
-
-	// block renders the shared context block per turn (who he is, the time).
-	// nil ⇒ the prompt stands alone.
-	block func() string
 }
 
-func newLLMReplier(c completer, block func() string) *llmReplier {
-	return &llmReplier{c: c, stub: voice.NewStubReplier(), block: block}
+func newLLMReplier(c phraser.Completer, block func() string) *llmReplier {
+	return &llmReplier{p: phraser.NewReplier(c, block), stub: voice.NewStubReplier()}
 }
 
-const replySystem = `Ты — Maven, домашняя ассистентка (о себе — в женском роде). Владелец — мужчина, говоришь с ним на "ты", в единственном числе; никогда не "вы"/"ваш" и не "он"/"его". Подтверди действие РОВНО ОДНИМ коротким предложением (≤120 символов), по-русски, спокойно и без официальных формулировок. Не задавай вопросов, не повторяй слова, не добавляй ничего после точки. Отвечай ТОЛЬКО одним объектом JSON с полями "response" (текст) и "mood" (ровно одно из: neutral, happy, thinking, tired, confused).
-Пример: {"response": "Записала, что ты выпил стакан воды.", "mood": "neutral"}
-Никогда не пиши "..." в поле response.`
-
+// Reply never fails: a clarify, a model error and an unusable generation all
+// answer from the stub, which is what keeps a turn from breaking on the model.
 func (r *llmReplier) Reply(d router.Decision) string {
 	if d.Clarify {
 		return r.stub.Reply(d)
 	}
-	ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), 60*time.Second)
-	defer cancel()
-	out, err := r.c.Complete(ctx, llm.Req{
-		System:        persona.Prepend(r.block, replySystem),
-		User:          replyContext(d),
-		Grammar:       phraser.ResponseGrammar,
-		MaxTokens:     512,
-		RepeatPenalty: 1.3,
-	})
-	if err != nil {
+	out, err := r.p.PhraseReply(context.Background(), d)
+	if err != nil || out == "" {
 		return r.stub.Reply(d)
 	}
-	out = stripThink(out)
-	if response, _ := parseResponseMood(out); response != "" {
-		return response
-	}
-	// fallback: try plain-text parsing
-	if out = firstSentence(out); out != "" {
-		return out
-	}
-	return r.stub.Reply(d)
-}
-
-// firstSentence trims the model's output to a single clean confirmation: first
-// line, first sentence, whitespace-normalized — the last-line defense against a
-// small model that rambles past the first period despite the prompt + stop.
-// stripThink removes the <think> block that Thinking-variant models emit.
-func stripThink(s string) string {
-	if i := strings.LastIndex(s, "</think>"); i >= 0 {
-		s = strings.TrimSpace(s[i+8:])
-	}
-	return s
-}
-
-func firstSentence(s string) string {
-	s = strings.TrimSpace(s)
-	if i := strings.IndexByte(s, '\n'); i >= 0 {
-		s = s[:i]
-	}
-	// keep up to and including the first sentence-ending punctuation.
-	if i := strings.IndexAny(s, ".!?"); i >= 0 {
-		s = s[:i+1]
-	}
-	return strings.TrimSpace(s)
-}
-
-// parseResponseMood extracts {"response","mood"} from LLM output, tolerant
-// of thinking tokens and extra text before/after the JSON block.
-func parseResponseMood(raw string) (response, mood string) {
-	cleaned := strings.TrimSpace(raw)
-	start := strings.Index(cleaned, "{")
-	end := strings.LastIndex(cleaned, "}")
-	if start < 0 || end < 0 || end <= start {
-		return "", ""
-	}
-	var parsed struct {
-		Response string `json:"response"`
-		Mood     string `json:"mood"`
-	}
-	if err := json.Unmarshal([]byte(cleaned[start:end+1]), &parsed); err != nil {
-		return "", ""
-	}
-	return parsed.Response, parsed.Mood
-}
-
-// replyContext renders the decision into a compact RU description for the model.
-func replyContext(d router.Decision) string {
-	switch d.Intent {
-	case router.IntentFact:
-		return "записала факт: " + d.Slots.Key + " " + d.Slots.Value
-	case router.IntentNote:
-		return "сохранила заметку: " + d.Slots.Text
-	case router.IntentReminder:
-		return "поставила напоминание: " + d.Slots.Text
-	default:
-		return string(d.Intent) + ": " + d.Slots.Text
-	}
+	return out
 }

cmd/mavend/replier_llm_test.go

@@ -5,28 +5,22 @@ import (
 	"testing"
 
 	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/llm"
-	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/phraser"
 	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/router"
 	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/voice"
 )
 
-type mockCompleter struct {
+// The phrasing itself is tested in internal/phraser. What is left here is the
+// only thing the daemon adds: the stub floor, on the three ways a reply can
+// fail to arrive.
+type stubCompleter struct {
 	out string
 	err error
 }
 
-func (m mockCompleter) Complete(_ context.Context, _ llm.Req) (string, error) { return m.out, m.err }
+func (s stubCompleter) Complete(_ context.Context, _ llm.Req) (string, error) { return s.out, s.err }
 
-func TestLLMReplierReturnsLLMReply(t *testing.T) {
-	r := newLLMReplier(mockCompleter{out: `{"response":"записала, кофе закончился","mood":"neutral"}`}, nil)
-	got := r.Reply(router.Decision{Intent: router.IntentNote, Slots: router.Slots{Text: "кофе закончился"}})
-	if got != "записала, кофе закончился" {
-		t.Errorf("got %q, want %q", got, "записала, кофе закончился")
-	}
-}
-
-func TestLLMReplierFallsBackToPlainText(t *testing.T) {
-	r := newLLMReplier(mockCompleter{out: "записала, кофе закончился"}, nil)
+func TestLLMReplierPassesTheModelReplyThrough(t *testing.T) {
+	r := newLLMReplier(stubCompleter{out: `{"response":"записала, кофе закончился","mood":"neutral"}`}, nil)
 	got := r.Reply(router.Decision{Intent: router.IntentNote, Slots: router.Slots{Text: "кофе закончился"}})
 	if got != "записала, кофе закончился" {
 		t.Errorf("got %q, want %q", got, "записала, кофе закончился")
@@ -34,54 +28,30 @@ func TestLLMReplierFallsBackToPlainText(t *testing.T) {
 }
 
 func TestLLMReplierFallsBackToStubOnError(t *testing.T) {
-	r := newLLMReplier(mockCompleter{err: errTestLLMDown}, nil)
-	noteDec := router.Decision{Intent: router.IntentNote}
-	got := r.Reply(noteDec)
-	want := voice.NewStubReplier().Reply(noteDec)
-	if got != want {
-		t.Errorf("on llm error: got %q, want stub %q", got, want)
-	}
+	r := newLLMReplier(stubCompleter{err: errReplierTest}, nil)
+	assertStub(t, r, router.Decision{Intent: router.IntentNote}, "llm error")
 }
 
 func TestLLMReplierFallsBackToStubOnEmpty(t *testing.T) {
-	r := newLLMReplier(mockCompleter{out: ""}, nil)
-	noteDec := router.Decision{Intent: router.IntentNote}
-	got := r.Reply(noteDec)
-	want := voice.NewStubReplier().Reply(noteDec)
-	if got != want {
-		t.Errorf("on empty llm: got %q, want stub %q", got, want)
-	}
+	r := newLLMReplier(stubCompleter{out: ""}, nil)
+	assertStub(t, r, router.Decision{Intent: router.IntentNote}, "empty llm")
 }
 
 func TestLLMReplierClarifyUsesStub(t *testing.T) {
-	r := newLLMReplier(mockCompleter{out: "я всё поняла"}, nil)
-	clarifyDec := router.Decision{Clarify: true}
-	got := r.Reply(clarifyDec)
-	want := voice.NewStubReplier().Reply(clarifyDec)
+	r := newLLMReplier(stubCompleter{out: "я всё поняла"}, nil)
+	assertStub(t, r, router.Decision{Clarify: true}, "clarify")
+}
+
+func assertStub(t *testing.T, r *llmReplier, d router.Decision, what string) {
+	t.Helper()
+	got, want := r.Reply(d), voice.NewStubReplier().Reply(d)
 	if got != want {
-		t.Errorf("on clarify: got %q, want stub %q", got, want)
+		t.Errorf("on %s: got %q, want stub %q", what, got, want)
 	}
 }
 
-var errTestLLMDown = errTest("llm down")
+var errReplierTest = errTest("llm down")
 
 type errTest string
 
 func (e errTest) Error() string { return string(e) }
-
-// grammarRecorder captures the request so the grammar can be asserted on.
-type grammarRecorder struct{ req llm.Req }
-
-func (g *grammarRecorder) Complete(_ context.Context, r llm.Req) (string, error) {
-	g.req = r
-	return `{"response":"записала","mood":"neutral"}`, nil
-}
-
-func TestLLMReplierCarriesTheResponseGrammar(t *testing.T) {
-	rec := &grammarRecorder{}
-	r := newLLMReplier(rec, nil)
-	r.Reply(router.Decision{Intent: router.IntentNote, Slots: router.Slots{Text: "кофе закончился"}})
-	if rec.req.Grammar != phraser.ResponseGrammar {
-		t.Errorf("grammar = %q, want phraser.ResponseGrammar", rec.req.Grammar)
-	}
-}

cmd/mavgpud/runner.go

@@ -24,7 +24,12 @@ type runner struct {
 	mu    sync.Mutex
 	cmd   *exec.Cmd
 	ready bool
-	http  *http.Client
+	// yielding — stop() has sent the signal and the exit that follows is ours.
+	// llama-server aborts on SIGTERM (its static teardown throws, upstream
+	// ggml-org/llama.cpp), so a routine yield and a real crash produce the same
+	// "signal: aborted" and used to log identically (Vikunja #491).
+	yielding bool
+	http     *http.Client
 }
 
 func newRunner(bin string, args []string, readyURL string) *runner {
@@ -70,13 +75,18 @@ func (r *runner) start() error {
 	if err := cmd.Start(); err != nil {
 		return err
 	}
-	r.cmd, r.ready = cmd, false
+	r.cmd, r.ready, r.yielding = cmd, false, false
 	log.Printf("mavgpud: started llama-server pid=%d", cmd.Process.Pid)
 	go func() {
 		err := cmd.Wait()
 		r.mu.Lock()
-		r.cmd, r.ready = nil, false
+		yielded := r.yielding
+		r.cmd, r.ready, r.yielding = nil, false, false
 		r.mu.Unlock()
+		if yielded {
+			log.Printf("mavgpud: llama-server stopped, card yielded (%v)", err)
+			return
+		}
 		log.Printf("mavgpud: llama-server exited: %v", err)
 	}()
 	return nil
@@ -90,6 +100,10 @@ func (r *runner) stop(grace time.Duration) {
 	r.mu.Lock()
 	cmd := r.cmd
 	r.ready = false
+	if cmd != nil && cmd.Process != nil {
+		// The exit that follows is ours, not a crash.
+		r.yielding = true
+	}
 	r.mu.Unlock()
 	if cmd == nil || cmd.Process == nil {
 		return

cmd/mavgpud/runner_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+package main
+
+import (
+	"os"
+	"path/filepath"
+	"testing"
+	"time"
+)
+
+// fakeServer writes an executable standing in for llama-server: it ignores
+// SIGTERM the way the real one effectively does — by dying messily rather than
+// cleanly — and reports a non-zero status.
+func fakeServer(t *testing.T, body string) string {
+	t.Helper()
+	path := filepath.Join(t.TempDir(), "fake-llama-server")
+	if err := os.WriteFile(path, []byte("#!/bin/sh\n"+body+"\n"), 0o755); err != nil {
+		t.Fatal(err)
+	}
+	return path
+}
+
+// A deliberate stop is a yield, and the log has to say so.
+//
+// llama-server aborts inside its own static teardown on SIGTERM, so the exit
+// status of a routine yield is identical to that of a real crash. Reading the
+// mavgpud log, the two were indistinguishable (Vikunja #491).
+func TestStopMarksTheExitAsAYield(t *testing.T) {
+	r := newRunner(fakeServer(t, "while : ; do sleep 1 ; done"), nil, "")
+	if err := r.start(); err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("start: %v", err)
+	}
+	r.mu.Lock()
+	if r.yielding {
+		t.Error("a freshly started server is already marked as yielding")
+	}
+	r.mu.Unlock()
+
+	r.stop(2 * time.Second)
+	deadline := time.Now().Add(2 * time.Second)
+	for time.Now().Before(deadline) {
+		if !r.running() {
+			return
+		}
+		time.Sleep(10 * time.Millisecond)
+	}
+	t.Fatal("the child outlived stop")
+}
+
+// Stopping when nothing is running must not arm the flag for the next child.
+// The next exit after that would be a real crash logged as a yield.
+func TestStopWithNoChildDoesNotArmTheFlag(t *testing.T) {
+	r := newRunner("/nonexistent", nil, "")
+	r.stop(10 * time.Millisecond)
+	r.mu.Lock()
+	defer r.mu.Unlock()
+	if r.yielding {
+		t.Error("stop armed the yield flag with no child running")
+	}
+}

deploy/mavgpud.service

@@ -19,6 +19,10 @@ RestartSec=5
 # llama-server on SIGTERM, so give it longer than stop_grace to do that.
 KillSignal=SIGTERM
 TimeoutStopSec=60
+# llama-server aborts inside its own static teardown on SIGTERM, so every
+# routine yield used to write a multi-gigabyte core into systemd-coredump
+# (Vikunja #491). Yielding is meant to happen several times a day.
+LimitCORE=0
 
 [Install]
 WantedBy=default.target

docs/evals/2026-08-03-recall-topic-veto.md

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+# Recall topic veto, what it costs and what it buys, 2026-08-03
+
+Vikunja #496. The task asked for a cross-language fix. Skip the topic veto in
+`memory.RecallAllowed` when the question and the hit are in different scripts.
+An English question would then stop losing a Russian note.
+
+No such case exists. No fixture case puts the question and its wanted note in
+different scripts. The case the task named is not one either.
+
+    en-hard-024
+      query  "what fixed the screen problem"
+      note   "the flicker went away once i swapped the display cable"
+
+Both are English. It is a paraphrase failure, not a language failure. A script
+test would not have changed a single case, and neither would a bilingual stem
+map.
+
+## What the veto is worth today
+
+Measured with the real embedder, multilingual-e5-small int8, gate 0.55, margin
+0.008. The first row is the veto as it ships. The second is `RecallAllowed`
+forced to true.
+
+| | cases passing | answered | false recall | silenced by gate |
+|---|---|---|---|---|
+| veto on | 22/32 | 17/27 | 0/5 | 2 |
+| veto off | 22/32 | 18/27 | 1/5 | 1 |
+
+The pass count does not move. The veto trades one true recall for one false one.
+It costs `en-hard-024` and it buys `ru-silent-029`:
+
+    ru-silent-029
+      query  "во сколько отходит поезд"
+      note   "погулял вдоль реки"        0.835, margin 0.019
+
+The second case counted as silenced by the gate is `ru-home-026` at margin
+0.001, which the margin gate stops. The veto has nothing to do with it.
+
+## Why no lexical rule separates the two
+
+`en-hard-024` and `ru-silent-029` are in the same lexical class. Both questions
+share zero content words with their hit, and neither carries a first-person
+marker. The scores sit on top of each other, 0.826 against 0.835, and so do the
+margins, 0.023 against 0.019. Only one thing separates them. A screen problem
+and a swapped display cable are the same event. A train and a river walk are
+not. The embedder scores that difference at nine thousandths.
+
+So the signal is semantic and the gate is lexical. Any rule cheap enough to sit
+in `RecallAllowed` and strong enough to recover `en-hard-024` also re-admits
+`ru-silent-029`, which puts false recall back to 1/5.
+
+One near-miss rule was tried on paper and rejected: let the veto pass when the
+hit itself is first person. It works on these two, because the English note says
+"i swapped" and the Russian note says only "погулял". It is backwards as a
+principle. A first-person note is exactly the personal note the veto keeps away
+from a world question. The rule would weaken the veto where it was designed to
+bite. It survives here only because Russian drops the pronoun.
+
+## Decision
+
+Accept the loss. `en-hard-024` stays silenced and false recall stays 0/5.
+
+The way out is a reranker, not a longer word list. Recall@3 is 85.2% against
+recall@1 at 70.4%, so the right note is usually in the returned set and ranked
+wrong. That is where the remaining points are, and it is not this task.

internal/calendar/calendar.go

@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ import (
 	"sort"
 	"strings"
 	"time"
+	"unicode"
 )
 
 // Fact sources. A calendar event reaches the store as a
@@ -153,14 +154,20 @@ func Overlapping(events []Event, from, to time.Time) []Event {
 	return out
 }
 
-// safeKey makes a summary safe to use inside a fact key (ASCII alphanumerics
-// and dashes). Non-Latin summaries collapse to their punctuation, which is why
-// the day prefix carries the identity and this only disambiguates within a day.
+// safeKey makes a summary safe to use inside a fact key: letters and digits in
+// any script, plus dashes, with space and underscore folded to a dash.
+//
+// It kept ASCII only until 04-08-2026, and dropped everything else. His
+// calendar is Russian, so "Встреча с Аней" and "Обед с мамой" both reduced to
+// "--" and produced the same key on the same day — the second event of the day
+// silently overwrote the first (Vikunja #443). Letting the letters through is
+// what makes the key identify the event. Migration #18 drops the keys written
+// under the old rule; they are re-derived on the next poll.
 func safeKey(s string) string {
 	var b strings.Builder
 	for _, r := range s {
 		switch {
-		case (r >= 'a' && r <= 'z') || (r >= 'A' && r <= 'Z') || (r >= '0' && r <= '9') || r == '-':
+		case unicode.IsLetter(r) || unicode.IsDigit(r) || r == '-':
 			b.WriteRune(r)
 		case r == ' ' || r == '_':
 			b.WriteRune('-')

internal/calendar/calendar_test.go

@@ -139,6 +139,9 @@ func TestSafeKey(t *testing.T) {
 		{"Hello_World", "Hello-World"},
 		{"special@#$chars!!", "specialchars"},
 		{"ALL_CAPS_123", "ALL-CAPS-123"},
+		// His calendar is Russian. These reduced to "--" and "--" (Vikunja #443).
+		{"Встреча с Аней", "Встреча-с-Аней"},
+		{"Обед с мамой", "Обед-с-мамой"},
 	}
 	for _, tt := range tests {
 		if got := safeKey(tt.in); got != tt.want {
@@ -263,3 +266,19 @@ func TestSourceTrust(t *testing.T) {
 		t.Errorf("Sources() = %v", Sources())
 	}
 }
+
+// Two Russian events on one day must not share a key. They did: safeKey kept
+// ASCII only, so both summaries collapsed to their spaces and the second event
+// overwrote the first in the store (Vikunja #443).
+func TestFactKeyDistinguishesRussianEventsOnOneDay(t *testing.T) {
+	day := time.Date(2026, 8, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC)
+	a := Event{Summary: "Встреча с Аней", Start: day.Add(10 * time.Hour), End: day.Add(11 * time.Hour)}
+	b := Event{Summary: "Обед с мамой", Start: day.Add(13 * time.Hour), End: day.Add(14 * time.Hour)}
+	if FactKeyIn(a, time.UTC) == FactKeyIn(b, time.UTC) {
+		t.Fatalf("both events keyed as %q", FactKeyIn(a, time.UTC))
+	}
+	// The day prefix still has to survive, because the store range-scans on it.
+	if !strings.HasPrefix(FactKeyIn(a, time.UTC), KeyPrefixForDay(day)) {
+		t.Fatalf("key %q lost the day prefix %q", FactKeyIn(a, time.UTC), KeyPrefixForDay(day))
+	}
+}

internal/memory/lexical.go

@@ -60,6 +60,14 @@ var firstPerson = map[string]bool{
 // kill one false one. A question about his own life keeps the embedder alone
 // as its judge. A question about the world has to name something the memory
 // actually mentions.
+//
+// The veto's price was re-measured on 2026-08-03 (#496,
+// docs/evals/2026-08-03-recall-topic-veto.md). It costs one true recall and
+// buys one false one, and the fixture pass count is the same either way. The
+// lost case is an English paraphrase, not the cross-language loss it was
+// reported as, and the fixture has no cross-language case at all. Do not add a
+// script test or a bilingual stem map for it — both are no-ops here. The
+// separating signal is semantic and belongs in a reranker, not in this file.
 func RecallAllowed(query, text string) bool {
 	if mentionsHim(query) {
 		return true

internal/memory/lexical_test.go

@@ -31,6 +31,22 @@ func TestRecallAllowed(t *testing.T) {
 	}
 }
 
+// The known cost of the veto and the thing that pays for it, both measured on
+// the held-out fixture with the real embedder (#496,
+// docs/evals/2026-08-03-recall-topic-veto.md). The two are one lexical class:
+// zero shared content words, no first-person marker, scores 0.826 against 0.835
+// and margins 0.023 against 0.019. Recovering the first re-admits the second,
+// which puts false recall back to 1/5. Anyone loosening the veto has to move
+// the first line without moving the second.
+func TestRecallVetoTradeIsPinned(t *testing.T) {
+	if RecallAllowed("what fixed the screen problem", "the flicker went away once i swapped the display cable") {
+		t.Error("en-hard-024 is expected to stay vetoed — if this passes now, re-measure false recall before celebrating")
+	}
+	if RecallAllowed("во сколько отходит поезд", "погулял вдоль реки") {
+		t.Error("ru-silent-029 must stay vetoed — this is the false recall the veto exists to stop")
+	}
+}
+
 // A question made only of filler has no topic word to match on, and the score
 // gate is then the only judge it can have.
 func TestRecallAllowedFallsBackWhenNothingToCompare(t *testing.T) {

internal/pattern/detector.go

@@ -53,9 +53,31 @@ const MinOnPatternFraction = 0.7
 // a repeat. False negatives cost one more observation and nothing else.
 const MinEvents = 4
 
+// MinIntervalDays — the fastest rhythm that may be called a routine. Two
+// hours.
+//
+// Without a floor, four taps of the same key minutes apart give intervals near
+// 0.002 days. They all sit inside the ±50% band by construction, so the
+// detector proposed a routine and PhraseRoutine worded it as "каждый день"
+// (Vikunja #468). The damage outlives the mistake: UNIQUE(action, object)
+// means dismissing the bogus proposal burns that pair permanently, so the real
+// routine behind it can never be proposed again.
+//
+// Two hours rather than a day, because a genuine habit can run several times a
+// day — meals, water, a break. Anything faster than that is not a habit she
+// should be proposing to remind him about; the loop rules already cover that
+// range, and they are rules, not guesses. It is checked against the median, so
+// one quick repeat inside a real rhythm still counts.
+//
+// The other half of this is that hand-QA of the detector was unsafe: seeding a
+// pattern the obvious way, four chat turns in a row, poisoned the very pair
+// being tested.
+const MinIntervalDays = 2.0 / 24.0
+
 // Detect checks whether a sequence of events for the same action+object
 // forms a stable recurring pattern. Returns a ProposedRoutine when:
 //   - At least MinEvents events exist (≥3 intervals)
+//   - The median interval is at least MinIntervalDays
 //   - At least MinOnPatternFraction of the intervals sit within
 //     MaxIntervalRatio of the median interval
 //
@@ -88,8 +110,8 @@ func Detect(events []Event) (*ProposedRoutine, error) {
 	}
 
 	center := medianFloat(intervals)
-	if center <= 0 {
-		return nil, nil
+	if center <= 0 || center < MinIntervalDays {
+		return nil, nil // a burst, not a rhythm — see MinIntervalDays
 	}
 
 	// Keep the intervals that sit inside the band around the median. The

internal/pattern/detector_test.go

@@ -216,3 +216,46 @@ func TestDetectMedianBandNotExtremes(t *testing.T) {
 		})
 	}
 }
+
+// A burst is not a habit. Four taps of the same key minutes apart give
+// intervals near 0.002 days, all inside the ±50% band by construction, so the
+// detector called it a daily routine (Vikunja #468). Dismissing that proposal
+// burns the action+object pair permanently, which also made hand-QA of the
+// detector unsafe.
+func TestDetectRejectsABurst(t *testing.T) {
+	base := time.Date(2026, 8, 4, 9, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC)
+	var events []Event
+	for i := 0; i < 4; i++ {
+		events = append(events, Event{
+			Action: "refill", Object: "cat_water",
+			Ts: base.Add(time.Duration(i) * 7 * time.Minute),
+		})
+	}
+	r, err := Detect(events)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("Detect: %v", err)
+	}
+	if r != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("four taps minutes apart proposed a routine every %.3f days", r.IntervalDays)
+	}
+}
+
+// The floor is two hours, not a day: a habit that runs several times a day is
+// still a habit.
+func TestDetectKeepsASeveralTimesADayHabit(t *testing.T) {
+	base := time.Date(2026, 8, 4, 8, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC)
+	var events []Event
+	for i := 0; i < 5; i++ {
+		events = append(events, Event{
+			Action: "drink", Object: "water",
+			Ts: base.Add(time.Duration(i) * 4 * time.Hour),
+		})
+	}
+	r, err := Detect(events)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("Detect: %v", err)
+	}
+	if r == nil {
+		t.Fatal("a four-hour rhythm over five events is a habit, got nil")
+	}
+}

internal/phraser/eval/checks.go

@@ -173,12 +173,23 @@ func checkFeminine(body string) Result {
 	// Second pass: self-reference with the pronoun dropped — "напомнил тебе",
 	// "проверил за тебя". A masculine past-tense verb whose object is HIM can
 	// only be her speaking about herself.
+	//
+	// Two guards, both from a false positive on the talk fixture: "ты заплатил
+	// за домен до марта" scored as her drift and cost the run a point it had
+	// earned (Vikunja #462). He is male, so a past-tense verb governed by "ты"
+	// must be masculine. And a bare "за" is not evidence of anything — "за
+	// домен" is a price, "за тебя" is her doing something on his behalf — so it
+	// only counts when he is the one it points at.
 	for i, w := range words {
-		if !masculinePast(w) || i+1 >= len(words) {
+		if !masculinePast(w) || i+1 >= len(words) || governedByYou(words, i) {
 			continue
 		}
 		next := words[i+1]
-		if next == "тебе" || next == "тебя" || next == "за" {
+		aboutHim := next == "тебе" || next == "тебя"
+		if next == "за" && i+2 < len(words) && (words[i+2] == "тебя" || words[i+2] == "тебе") {
+			aboutHim = true
+		}
+		if aboutHim {
 			return Result{CheckFeminine, false,
 				fmt.Sprintf("masculine self-reference %q before %q", w, next)}
 		}
@@ -652,3 +663,19 @@ func checkEllipsis(body string) Result {
 	}
 	return Result{CheckEllipsis, true, ""}
 }
+
+// governedByYou reports whether "ты" stands close enough in front of the verb
+// at index i to be its subject. Three words, the same window checkFeminine's
+// first pass uses after "я", and it stops at a first-person pronoun so "ты
+// просил, я напомнил" still trips.
+func governedByYou(words []string, i int) bool {
+	for j := i - 1; j >= 0 && j >= i-3; j-- {
+		switch words[j] {
+		case "ты":
+			return true
+		case "я":
+			return false
+		}
+	}
+	return false
+}

internal/phraser/eval/eval_test.go

@@ -106,6 +106,12 @@ func TestChecksCatchWhatTheyClaim(t *testing.T) {
 		{"masculine predicative", "я должен сказать: попей воды.", CheckFeminine},
 		// The other direction: HE is male, so second-person masculine is right.
 		{"second person masculine ok", "ты не пил воду четыре часа.", ""},
+		// The recorded false positive: "заплатил" sits before "за", and the
+		// second pass read that as her dropping the pronoun. The subject is
+		// "ты" and he is male, so the reply is right (Vikunja #462).
+		{"second person masculine before за", "ты заплатил за домен до марта, а воду пить всё равно надо.", ""},
+		// The same shape she really does get wrong still trips.
+		{"masculine on his behalf", "проверил за тебя — воды не было четыре часа.", CheckFeminine},
 		// The real observed failure: she addressed him as a woman.
 		{"feminine second person", "ты давно не отдыхала — попей воды.", CheckHisGender},
 		{"feminine second person no dash", "ты пила воду четыре часа назад.", CheckHisGender},

internal/phraser/eval/talk.go

@@ -26,20 +26,22 @@ import (
 	"time"
 
 	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/dialogue"
+	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/router"
 )
 
 //go:embed talk_v1.json
 var talkFixtureJSON []byte
 
-// The three phrasing paths under test. Values match the fixture's "path" field.
+// The phrasing paths under test. Values match the fixture's "path" field.
 const (
 	PathChat      = "chat"      // PhraseChat
 	PathQuery     = "query"     // PhraseQuery with notes
 	PathKnowledge = "knowledge" // PhraseQuery with no notes
+	PathReply     = "reply"     // PhraseReply, the reactive confirmation
 )
 
 // TalkPaths — report order.
-var TalkPaths = []string{PathChat, PathQuery, PathKnowledge}
+var TalkPaths = []string{PathChat, PathQuery, PathKnowledge, PathReply}
 
 // TalkCheckNames — the checks that apply to a free-form reply, in report order.
 // Deliberately a subset of CheckNames: length, mood and "no questions" are nudge
@@ -58,12 +60,19 @@ var TalkCheckNames = []string{
 // WantAny is the on-topic contract: at least one lowercased fragment must appear
 // in the reply. Fragments are stems ("пароль" → "парол") so declension does not
 // defeat them.
+//
+// Intent, Key and Value carry the reply path's decision: that path is phrased
+// from what the router already resolved, not from the raw utterance. Utterance
+// stays filled anyway, because it is what a human reads in the report.
 type TalkCase struct {
 	ID        string   `json:"id"`
 	Path      string   `json:"path"`
 	Utterance string   `json:"utterance"`
 	History   []string `json:"history,omitempty"`
 	Notes     []string `json:"notes,omitempty"`
+	Intent    string   `json:"intent,omitempty"`
+	Key       string   `json:"key,omitempty"`
+	Value     string   `json:"value,omitempty"`
 	WantAny   []string `json:"want_any"`
 	Tags      []string `json:"tags,omitempty"`
 	Note      string   `json:"note,omitempty"`
@@ -92,13 +101,27 @@ func LoadTalk() (TalkFixture, error) {
 	return f, nil
 }
 
-// Talker — the two methods a conversational path must have to be scorable.
-// *phraser.LLMPhraser satisfies it; same trick as Nudger.
+// Talker — the methods a conversational path must have to be scorable.
+// *phraser.LLMPhraser satisfies the first two; *phraser.Replier satisfies the
+// third, so a run that scores all four paths passes a Pair.
 type Talker interface {
 	PhraseChat(ctx context.Context, utterance string, history []dialogue.Turn) (string, error)
 	PhraseQuery(ctx context.Context, utterance string, notes []string) (string, error)
 }
 
+// Confirmer — the reply path. *phraser.Replier satisfies it.
+type Confirmer interface {
+	PhraseReply(ctx context.Context, d router.Decision) (string, error)
+}
+
+// Pair joins the two objects the daemon wires separately — the phraser and the
+// replier — so one ScoreTalk call covers every path Maven speaks through. A bare
+// Talker still works; its reply cases score as errors, which is honest.
+type Pair struct {
+	Talker
+	Confirmer
+}
+
 // TalkOutcome — one scored case.
 type TalkOutcome struct {
 	Case    TalkCase
@@ -194,10 +217,30 @@ func (c TalkCase) run(ctx context.Context, t Talker) (string, error) {
 		return t.PhraseQuery(ctx, c.Utterance, c.Notes)
 	case PathKnowledge:
 		return t.PhraseQuery(ctx, c.Utterance, nil)
+	case PathReply:
+		conf, ok := t.(Confirmer)
+		if !ok {
+			return "", fmt.Errorf("target cannot phrase replies — pass a Pair")
+		}
+		return conf.PhraseReply(ctx, c.decision())
 	}
 	return "", fmt.Errorf("unknown path %q", c.Path)
 }
 
+// decision rebuilds what the router would have handed the replier. Text is the
+// utterance for a note or a reminder, which is what the router puts there.
+func (c TalkCase) decision() router.Decision {
+	return router.Decision{
+		Intent: router.Intent(c.Intent),
+		Slots: router.Slots{
+			Key:    c.Key,
+			Value:  c.Value,
+			Text:   c.Utterance,
+			HasKey: c.Key != "",
+		},
+	}
+}
+
 func (c TalkCase) turns() []dialogue.Turn {
 	turns := make([]dialogue.Turn, 0, len(c.History))
 	for _, h := range c.History {

internal/phraser/eval/talk_test.go

@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ import (
 	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/llm"
 	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/persona"
 	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/phraser"
+	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/router"
 )
 
 // perPathMinimum — the resolution floor. A per-path score built on a handful of
@@ -36,6 +37,10 @@ func TestTalkFixture(t *testing.T) {
 
 		switch c.Path {
 		case PathChat, PathQuery, PathKnowledge:
+		case PathReply:
+			if c.Intent == "" {
+				t.Errorf("%s: reply case has no intent — the replier is phrased from the decision", c.ID)
+			}
 		default:
 			t.Errorf("%s: unknown path %q", c.ID, c.Path)
 		}
@@ -69,10 +74,15 @@ type fakeTalker struct{ reply string }
 func (f fakeTalker) PhraseChat(context.Context, string, []dialogue.Turn) (string, error) {
 	return f.reply, nil
 }
+
 func (f fakeTalker) PhraseQuery(context.Context, string, []string) (string, error) {
 	return f.reply, nil
 }
 
+func (f fakeTalker) PhraseReply(context.Context, router.Decision) (string, error) {
+	return f.reply, nil
+}
+
 // TestScoreTalkCounts — a reply that fails on purpose must be counted on every
 // path, so a real run cannot report a hidden zero.
 func TestScoreTalkCounts(t *testing.T) {
@@ -104,7 +114,7 @@ func TestScoreTalkCounts(t *testing.T) {
 	}
 }
 
-// TestLLMTalkBaseline — the resident model on the three conversational paths.
+// TestLLMTalkBaseline — the resident model on all four phrasing paths.
 // Opt-in exactly like TestLLMPhrasingBaseline: CI has no model and a run costs
 // minutes on the CPU target.
 //
@@ -148,7 +158,12 @@ func TestLLMTalkBaseline(t *testing.T) {
 	}
 	t.Logf("scoring model %s at %s", model, base)
 
-	rep, err := ScoreTalk(ctx, "llm ("+model+", built-in persona)", p, f)
+	// The reply path is a separate object in the daemon too: the phraser owns its
+	// own llama-server, the replier is handed an llm.Client. Pair scores both.
+	block := func() string { return persona.Facts{}.Block(time.Now()) }
+	target := Pair{Talker: p, Confirmer: phraser.NewReplier(llm.New(base, cfg.Timeout), block)}
+
+	rep, err := ScoreTalk(ctx, "llm ("+model+", built-in persona)", target, f)
 	if err != nil {
 		t.Fatalf("ScoreTalk: %v", err)
 	}

internal/phraser/eval/talk_v1.json

@@ -222,6 +222,90 @@
       "utterance": "почему гром слышно позже молнии?",
       "want_any": ["звук", "све", "быстр", "гром", "молни"],
       "tags": ["general"]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "reply-fact-coffee",
+      "path": "reply",
+      "intent": "fact",
+      "key": "кофе",
+      "value": "закончился",
+      "utterance": "кофе закончился",
+      "want_any": ["коф"],
+      "tags": ["fact"],
+      "note": "The plainest confirmation there is, and the sentence he hears most often."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "reply-fact-weight",
+      "path": "reply",
+      "intent": "fact",
+      "key": "вес",
+      "value": "82",
+      "utterance": "мой вес 82",
+      "want_any": ["вес", "82"],
+      "tags": ["fact", "number"],
+      "note": "A number must survive into the confirmation; a paraphrase that drops it is useless."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "reply-fact-pill",
+      "path": "reply",
+      "intent": "fact",
+      "key": "таблетки",
+      "value": "выпил",
+      "utterance": "таблетки выпил",
+      "want_any": ["таблетк"],
+      "tags": ["fact", "feminine"],
+      "note": "He says 'выпил', masculine and about himself. She must not copy the form onto herself."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "reply-note-router",
+      "path": "reply",
+      "intent": "note",
+      "utterance": "роутер перезагружается сам по ночам",
+      "want_any": ["роутер"],
+      "tags": ["note"]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "reply-note-long",
+      "path": "reply",
+      "intent": "note",
+      "utterance": "если диск снова отвалится, посмотреть кабель, а не контроллер, в прошлый раз был кабель",
+      "want_any": ["диск", "кабел"],
+      "tags": ["note", "length"],
+      "note": "A long note baits a long confirmation. One sentence is the contract."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "reply-reminder-evening",
+      "path": "reply",
+      "intent": "reminder",
+      "utterance": "напомни вечером полить цветы",
+      "want_any": ["цвет", "полит", "вечер"],
+      "tags": ["reminder"]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "reply-reminder-tomorrow",
+      "path": "reply",
+      "intent": "reminder",
+      "utterance": "напомни завтра позвонить в поликлинику",
+      "want_any": ["поликлиник", "позвон", "звон"],
+      "tags": ["reminder"]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "reply-formality-bait",
+      "path": "reply",
+      "intent": "note",
+      "utterance": "запишите пожалуйста что счётчики я сдал",
+      "want_any": ["счётчик", "счетчик"],
+      "tags": ["note", "persona-bait", "address"],
+      "note": "Polite plural in the input. The confirmation must still be на ты."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "reply-question-bait",
+      "path": "reply",
+      "intent": "note",
+      "utterance": "надо купить фильтр для воды, не помню какой",
+      "want_any": ["фильтр"],
+      "tags": ["note", "no-question"],
+      "note": "An unresolved note invites her to ask which filter. A confirmation does not ask."
     }
   ]
 }

internal/phraser/replier.go

@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+// phraser/replier.go — reactive reply phrasing, the confirmation he hears
+// after every fact, note and reminder.
+//
+// It lived in cmd/mavend as package main until Vikunja #396, which meant the
+// most frequently heard sentence Maven says was the one path the phrasing eval
+// could not import, let alone score. Nothing here talks to the daemon: the
+// caller supplies the completer and the context block, and cmd/mavend keeps the
+// stub fallback so a model error still answers.
+package phraser
+
+import (
+	"context"
+	"strings"
+	"time"
+
+	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/llm"
+	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/persona"
+	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/router"
+)
+
+// Completer is the model seam for the replier, a subset of router.Completer.
+// *llm.Client satisfies it.
+type Completer interface {
+	Complete(ctx context.Context, r llm.Req) (string, error)
+}
+
+// replyTimeout bounds one reply. Generous because the resident model on the CPU
+// floor is slow and the caller has a deterministic fallback anyway.
+const replyTimeout = 60 * time.Second
+
+// ReplySystemPrompt — the reactive confirmation contract: one short Russian
+// sentence, feminine self-reference, informal address, no question.
+const ReplySystemPrompt = `Ты — Maven, домашняя ассистентка (о себе — в женском роде). Владелец — мужчина, говоришь с ним на "ты", в единственном числе; никогда не "вы"/"ваш" и не "он"/"его". Подтверди действие РОВНО ОДНИМ коротким предложением (≤120 символов), по-русски, спокойно и без официальных формулировок. Не задавай вопросов, не повторяй слова, не добавляй ничего после точки. Отвечай ТОЛЬКО одним объектом JSON с полями "response" (текст) и "mood" (ровно одно из: neutral, happy, thinking, tired, confused).
+Пример: {"response": "Записала, что ты выпил стакан воды.", "mood": "neutral"}
+Никогда не пиши "..." в поле response.`
+
+// Replier phrases reactive confirmations with the resident model. It has no
+// fallback of its own: an error is returned, and the daemon answers from the
+// deterministic stub. That is also what makes it scorable — a dead server shows
+// up as an error rather than as bad phrasing.
+type Replier struct {
+	c Completer
+
+	// block renders the shared context block per turn (who he is, the time).
+	// nil ⇒ the prompt stands alone.
+	block func() string
+}
+
+// NewReplier builds a replier over c. block may be nil.
+func NewReplier(c Completer, block func() string) *Replier {
+	return &Replier{c: c, block: block}
+}
+
+// PhraseReply returns the confirmation for one decision. An empty string with a
+// nil error means the model produced nothing usable, which the caller must
+// treat exactly like an error.
+func (r *Replier) PhraseReply(ctx context.Context, d router.Decision) (string, error) {
+	ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(ctx, replyTimeout)
+	defer cancel()
+	out, err := r.c.Complete(ctx, llm.Req{
+		System:        persona.Prepend(r.block, ReplySystemPrompt),
+		User:          replyContext(d),
+		Grammar:       ResponseGrammar,
+		MaxTokens:     512,
+		RepeatPenalty: 1.3,
+	})
+	if err != nil {
+		return "", err
+	}
+	out = stripThink(out)
+	if response, _, perr := parseResponseMood(out); perr != nil {
+		return "", perr
+	} else if response != "" {
+		return response, nil
+	}
+	// fallback: the model answered in bare prose, which is fine here.
+	return firstSentence(out), nil
+}
+
+// firstSentence trims the model's output to a single clean confirmation: first
+// line, first sentence, whitespace-normalized — the last-line defense against a
+// small model that rambles past the first period despite the prompt + stop.
+func firstSentence(s string) string {
+	s = strings.TrimSpace(s)
+	if i := strings.IndexByte(s, '\n'); i >= 0 {
+		s = s[:i]
+	}
+	// keep up to and including the first sentence-ending punctuation.
+	if i := strings.IndexAny(s, ".!?"); i >= 0 {
+		s = s[:i+1]
+	}
+	return strings.TrimSpace(s)
+}
+
+// replyContext renders the decision into a compact RU description for the model.
+func replyContext(d router.Decision) string {
+	switch d.Intent {
+	case router.IntentFact:
+		return "записала факт: " + d.Slots.Key + " " + d.Slots.Value
+	case router.IntentNote:
+		return "сохранила заметку: " + d.Slots.Text
+	case router.IntentReminder:
+		return "поставила напоминание: " + d.Slots.Text
+	default:
+		return string(d.Intent) + ": " + d.Slots.Text
+	}
+}
+
+// StripThink removes the <think> block a Thinking-variant model emits before its
+// answer. Exported for the daemon's own model callers, which parse output that
+// never passes through a phraser method.
+func StripThink(s string) string { return stripThink(s) }

internal/phraser/replier_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+package phraser
+
+import (
+	"context"
+	"testing"
+
+	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/llm"
+	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/router"
+)
+
+type mockCompleter struct {
+	out string
+	err error
+}
+
+func (m mockCompleter) Complete(_ context.Context, _ llm.Req) (string, error) { return m.out, m.err }
+
+func TestReplierReturnsLLMReply(t *testing.T) {
+	r := NewReplier(mockCompleter{out: `{"response":"записала, кофе закончился","mood":"neutral"}`}, nil)
+	got, err := r.PhraseReply(context.Background(), noteDecision())
+	if err != nil || got != "записала, кофе закончился" {
+		t.Errorf("got %q, %v, want %q, nil", got, err, "записала, кофе закончился")
+	}
+}
+
+func TestReplierFallsBackToPlainText(t *testing.T) {
+	r := NewReplier(mockCompleter{out: "записала, кофе закончился"}, nil)
+	got, err := r.PhraseReply(context.Background(), noteDecision())
+	if err != nil || got != "записала, кофе закончился" {
+		t.Errorf("got %q, %v, want %q, nil", got, err, "записала, кофе закончился")
+	}
+}
+
+func TestReplierReportsTheModelError(t *testing.T) {
+	r := NewReplier(mockCompleter{err: errTestLLMDown}, nil)
+	got, err := r.PhraseReply(context.Background(), noteDecision())
+	if err == nil {
+		t.Errorf("got %q, nil error — a dead model must be reported, not phrased around", got)
+	}
+}
+
+// A fragment the grammar left half-open is a failed generation. It must come
+// back as an error so the daemon reaches its stub, not as a reply.
+func TestReplierRejectsBrokenJSON(t *testing.T) {
+	r := NewReplier(mockCompleter{out: `{"response":"запис`}, nil)
+	got, err := r.PhraseReply(context.Background(), noteDecision())
+	if err == nil || got != "" {
+		t.Errorf("got %q, %v, want empty and an error", got, err)
+	}
+}
+
+func TestReplierEmptyOutputIsEmpty(t *testing.T) {
+	r := NewReplier(mockCompleter{out: ""}, nil)
+	got, err := r.PhraseReply(context.Background(), noteDecision())
+	if err != nil || got != "" {
+		t.Errorf("got %q, %v, want empty and no error", got, err)
+	}
+}
+
+// grammarRecorder captures the request so the grammar can be asserted on.
+type grammarRecorder struct{ req llm.Req }
+
+func (g *grammarRecorder) Complete(_ context.Context, r llm.Req) (string, error) {
+	g.req = r
+	return `{"response":"записала","mood":"neutral"}`, nil
+}
+
+func TestReplierCarriesTheResponseGrammar(t *testing.T) {
+	rec := &grammarRecorder{}
+	r := NewReplier(rec, nil)
+	if _, err := r.PhraseReply(context.Background(), noteDecision()); err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("PhraseReply: %v", err)
+	}
+	if rec.req.Grammar != ResponseGrammar {
+		t.Errorf("grammar = %q, want ResponseGrammar", rec.req.Grammar)
+	}
+	if rec.req.System != ReplySystemPrompt {
+		t.Errorf("system prompt = %q, want ReplySystemPrompt", rec.req.System)
+	}
+}
+
+func noteDecision() router.Decision {
+	return router.Decision{Intent: router.IntentNote, Slots: router.Slots{Text: "кофе закончился"}}
+}
+
+var errTestLLMDown = errTest("llm down")
+
+type errTest string
+
+func (e errTest) Error() string { return string(e) }

internal/router/agenda_test.go

@@ -75,3 +75,47 @@ func TestAgendaGrammarSparesStatements(t *testing.T) {
 		}
 	}
 }
+
+// The tomorrow form and the bare event noun. Both were measured answering
+// "пока не умею" on the deployed daemon, 02-08-2026, while the same question
+// about today worked — the first rule set needed "у меня" or a calendar noun
+// and these phrasings carry neither (Vikunja #471).
+func TestAgendaCoversOtherDaysAndNamedEvents(t *testing.T) {
+	r := agendaRouter(t)
+	for _, u := range []string{
+		"какие планы на завтра?",
+		"какие планы на послезавтра",
+		"что по делам в среду",
+		"какие планы на выходные",
+		"когда планёрка?",
+		"во сколько созвон",
+		"когда будет совещание",
+	} {
+		d, err := r.Route(context.Background(), u, refNow())
+		if err != nil {
+			t.Fatalf("route(%q): %v", u, err)
+		}
+		if d.Intent != IntentQuery {
+			t.Errorf("route(%q) = %s, want query", u, d.Intent)
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+// The two new rules are narrow on purpose. A world question that opens with
+// "когда" is not an agenda question, and telling her about a plan is not
+// asking about one.
+func TestAgendaGrammarsLeaveTheWorldAlone(t *testing.T) {
+	r := agendaRouter(t)
+	for _, u := range []string{
+		"когда была битва при ватерлоо",
+		"когда изобрели телефон",
+	} {
+		d, err := r.Route(context.Background(), u, refNow())
+		if err != nil {
+			t.Fatalf("route(%q): %v", u, err)
+		}
+		if d.Stage == 0 {
+			t.Errorf("route(%q) was claimed at stage 0 as %s", u, d.Intent)
+		}
+	}
+}

internal/router/eval/ru_routing_v1.json

@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
     { "id": "ru-query-012", "utterance": "какие заметки я оставил про полив", "lang": "ru", "intent": "query", "tags": ["recall"] },
     { "id": "ru-query-013", "utterance": "во сколько у меня встреча", "lang": "ru", "intent": "query", "tags": ["calendar"] },
     { "id": "ru-query-019", "utterance": "что у меня стоит в календаре на послезавтра", "lang": "ru", "intent": "query", "tags": ["calendar", "hard"], "note": "agenda, not the clock: the daemon answers this from CalendarEvents inside the query branch, so the clock/date system rule must not swallow it" },
+    { "id": "ru-query-022", "utterance": "какие планы на завтра?", "lang": "ru", "intent": "query", "tags": ["calendar"], "note": "the same agenda question as ru-query-019 aimed at another day; it answered \u043f\u043e\u043a\u0430 \u043d\u0435 \u0443\u043c\u0435\u044e on the deployed daemon while the today form worked (Vikunja #471)" },
+    { "id": "ru-query-023", "utterance": "\u043a\u043e\u0433\u0434\u0430 \u043f\u043b\u0430\u043d\u0451\u0440\u043a\u0430?", "lang": "ru", "intent": "query", "tags": ["calendar", "hard"], "note": "a named event with no calendar word — the noun is the only signal that this is a question about his day" },
     { "id": "ru-query-014", "utterance": "я успеваю до дедлайна", "lang": "ru", "intent": "query", "tags": ["hard", "no-question-word"] },
     { "id": "ru-query-015", "utterance": "сколько я прошёл шагов", "lang": "ru", "intent": "query", "tags": ["aggregate"] },
     { "id": "ru-query-016", "utterance": "покажи давление за неделю", "lang": "ru", "intent": "query", "tags": ["hard", "imperative"], "note": "imperative form but a read — must not route to act" },

internal/router/llmrouter.go

@@ -210,7 +210,11 @@ func (lr *LLMRouter) Route(ctx context.Context, utterance string, now time.Time)
 		d.Slots.HasKey = a.Key != ""
 	case IntentReminder:
 		d.Intent = IntentReminder
-		d.Slots.Text = firstNonEmpty(a.Text, utterance)
+		// No utterance fallback here, unlike every other intent below. The
+		// model returning no text for a reminder means it found no subject,
+		// and "напомни в 11" is not a subject. Leaving Text empty is what
+		// lets the gate turn that into a question (Vikunja #383).
+		d.Slots.Text = a.Text
 	case IntentNote:
 		d.Intent = IntentNote
 		d.Slots.Text = firstNonEmpty(a.Text, utterance)

internal/router/llmrouter_test.go

@@ -356,3 +356,35 @@ func TestRouterLLMFactWithResolvedKeyStaysConfident(t *testing.T) {
 		t.Fatalf("a fact the parser could key must not clarify: %+v", d)
 	}
 }
+
+// A reminder with a time and no subject must come back empty and gated, not
+// backfilled with the raw words. "напомни в 11" carries an hour and nothing to
+// say at that hour; parking the utterance in Text made the request look
+// complete, so the daemon set a reminder that fires saying "напомни в 11"
+// (Vikunja #383).
+func TestLLMReminderWithoutSubjectAsksInsteadOfGuessing(t *testing.T) {
+	r := newLLMTestRouter(t, `{"intent":"reminder"}`)
+	d, err := r.Route(context.Background(), "напомни в 11", refNow())
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("route: %v", err)
+	}
+	if d.Slots.Text != "" {
+		t.Fatalf("subject backfilled from the utterance: %q", d.Slots.Text)
+	}
+	if !d.Clarify {
+		t.Fatalf("a subjectless reminder was accepted, confidence %v", d.Confidence)
+	}
+}
+
+// The gate is about the subject, not about reminders in general: one that has
+// both halves still runs without a question.
+func TestLLMReminderWithSubjectIsNotGated(t *testing.T) {
+	r := newLLMTestRouter(t, `{"intent":"reminder","text":"позвонить маме"}`)
+	d, err := r.Route(context.Background(), "напомни в 11 позвонить маме", refNow())
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("route: %v", err)
+	}
+	if d.Clarify {
+		t.Fatalf("a complete reminder was sent back as a question: %+v", d.Slots)
+	}
+}

internal/router/router.go

@@ -147,7 +147,15 @@ func (r *Router) fillSlots(ctx context.Context, d *Decision, now time.Time) {
 			d.Slots.Fn, d.Slots.Args, d.Slots.HasFn = fn, args, true
 		}
 	}
-	if d.Slots.Text == "" {
+	// The extractor's Text is the raw utterance, which is the payload for a
+	// note, a query or a chat turn but not for a reminder — there Text is the
+	// subject, what she says at the hour. Backfilling it made Text impossible
+	// to be empty, so StillMissing never reported SlotText and "О чём
+	// напомнить?" was unaskable; the answer to a question she did manage to
+	// ask then overwrote the whole request instead of filling one gap
+	// (Vikunja #383). A reminder with no subject stays empty and is gated
+	// below into a question.
+	if d.Slots.Text == "" && d.Intent != IntentReminder {
 		d.Slots.Text = ex.Text
 	}
 	// Stage stays 1: it says who decided the route, and that was the LLM.
@@ -177,6 +185,12 @@ func (r *Router) gateLLMDecision(d *Decision) {
 	if d.Intent == IntentAct && !d.Slots.HasFn && d.Confidence > llmThinConfidence {
 		d.Confidence = llmThinConfidence
 	}
+	// A reminder with no subject: she knows when but not what to say then.
+	// Setting it anyway fires an empty reminder at the hour, which reads as a
+	// bug to him and cannot be repaired after the fact. Ask (Vikunja #383).
+	if d.Intent == IntentReminder && d.Slots.Text == "" && d.Confidence > llmThinConfidence {
+		d.Confidence = llmThinConfidence
+	}
 	if d.Confidence < r.threshold {
 		d.Clarify = true
 	}

internal/router/stage0.go

@@ -182,9 +182,38 @@ func AgendaQueryGrammars() []Grammar {
 			Pattern: regexp.MustCompile(`(?i)^\s*(что|чего|какие|сколько|во\s+сколько|когда)\s+у\s+меня(\s|[?!.]|$)`),
 			Build:   agendaQueryBuild,
 		},
+		{
+			// A plan noun aimed at a named day, with no possessive to anchor
+			// on: "какие планы на завтра", "что по делам в среду". The rule
+			// above wants "у меня" and this phrasing never has it, so
+			// "какие планы на завтра" answered "пока не умею" while "какие
+			// планы на сегодня" worked (Vikunja #471). The day word is what
+			// makes it an agenda question rather than a topic.
+			Name: "plan-day-query",
+			// Only "план" and "дел". A verb stem like "встреч" would take
+			// "встречаемся в среду", which is him telling her something, not
+			// asking.
+			Pattern: regexp.MustCompile(`(?i)(^|\s)(план|дел)[а-я]*\s+(на|в|во|по)\s+` + dayWordPattern + `(\s|[?!.]|$)`),
+			Build:   agendaQueryBuild,
+		},
+		{
+			// A named event with no calendar word at all: "когда планёрка?",
+			// "во сколько созвон". He is asking when something on his calendar
+			// happens, and the noun is the only signal. Closed list, so "когда
+			// битва при Ватерлоо" is still a world question.
+			Name:    "event-time-query",
+			Pattern: regexp.MustCompile(`(?i)^\s*(когда|во\s+сколько|в\s+котором\s+часу)\s+(будет\s+|у\s+нас\s+)?(планёрк|планерк|встреч|созвон|митинг|совещани|звонок|созвон|приём|прием|интервью|собеседовани|тренировк|урок|занятие|пара)[а-я]*(\s|[?!.]|$)`),
+			Build:   agendaQueryBuild,
+		},
 	}
 }
 
+// dayWordPattern — the day words an agenda question can name. Weekdays appear
+// in the accusative and prepositional forms the questions actually use ("в
+// среду", "на среде"), which is why the stems carry an inflection tail rather
+// than a fixed ending.
+const dayWordPattern = `(сегодня|завтра|послезавтра|выходн[а-я]+|недел[а-я]+|понедельник[а-я]*|вторник[а-я]*|сред[ауые][а-я]*|четверг[а-я]*|пятниц[ауые][а-я]*|суббот[ауые][а-я]*|воскресень[ея][а-я]*)`
+
 // agendaQueryBuild — shared Build for the agenda grammars. Confidence 1.0 on
 // the intent only: the utterance travels intact and the query chain's own
 // matchers decide the rest.

internal/store/migrations.go

@@ -208,6 +208,17 @@ ALTER TABLE reminders ADD COLUMN next_fire_ts INTEGER;`, // #2
 	// list_tasks into something that writes without the row changing by one
 	// byte. The fingerprint is the declared shape at approval time, so a
 	// redefinition is a re-approval instead of a silent upgrade.
+	`DELETE FROM facts
+	  WHERE key LIKE 'calendar_event_%'
+	    AND replace(substr(key, 25), '-', '') = '';`,
+	// #18 — drop the calendar keys written while safeKey dropped Cyrillic
+	// (Vikunja #443). Everything after the date prefix was punctuation, so
+	// every Russian event on one day shared one key and only the last one
+	// survived. Deleting rather than rewriting: a calendar fact is derived
+	// data, the next poll writes the day again under keys that identify the
+	// event, and the old rows would otherwise be recited as extra meetings.
+	// The filter is exact — it keeps any key whose summary part still has a
+	// letter or a digit in it.
 }
 
 // migrate applies every migration with a number greater than the DB's current

internal/store/migrations_test.go

@@ -47,3 +47,36 @@ func TestMigrateAppliesOnceAndIsIdempotent(t *testing.T) {
 		t.Fatalf("after re-migrate user_version = %d, want %d", v, want)
 	}
 }
+
+// Migration #18 clears the calendar keys written while safeKey dropped
+// Cyrillic. Those rows are indistinguishable from real events on read, so
+// leaving them would recite one meeting as several (Vikunja #443).
+func TestCollapsedCalendarKeysAreDropped(t *testing.T) {
+	ctx := context.Background()
+	s := newTestStore(t)
+
+	rows := []string{
+		"calendar_event_20260804_--",             // "Встреча с Аней" under the old rule
+		"calendar_event_20260804_",               // a one-word Russian summary
+		"calendar_event_20260804_Встреча-с-Аней", // the new format
+		"calendar_event_20260804_Standup",        // an ASCII summary, always fine
+	}
+	for _, key := range rows {
+		if _, err := s.db.ExecContext(ctx,
+			`INSERT INTO facts (ts, kind, key, value, source, confidence) VALUES (0, 'env', ?, 'x', 'poll:caldav', 1.0)`,
+			key); err != nil {
+			t.Fatalf("seed %q: %v", key, err)
+		}
+	}
+	if _, err := s.db.ExecContext(ctx, migrations[17]); err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("migration 18: %v", err)
+	}
+
+	var got int
+	if err := s.db.QueryRowContext(ctx, `SELECT count(*) FROM facts WHERE key LIKE 'calendar_event_%'`).Scan(&got); err != nil {
+		t.Fatal(err)
+	}
+	if got != 2 {
+		t.Fatalf("%d calendar rows left, want the 2 that identify their event", got)
+	}
+}