Vikunja #363. The follow-up session was a plain in-memory map, so any
mavend restart dropped the thread. It now mirrors to a small TTL-pruned
sqlite table and is loaded on startup; expired sessions are deleted on
load, not revived. Clarify's pending question is untouched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
An unclear answer used to end the request on the spot. Now she re-asks the same
question while attempts remain, and when they run out she says
"Прости, я не поняла. Скажи, пожалуйста, по-другому." — silence would leave him
thinking it was handled. Same reply when the missing slot has no question to
ask, and as a floor in finishClarified so an empty reply can never ship.
Tests: three questions allowed, the fourth gives up out loud, the cap is
configurable, and a restated time is the one that lands.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
MaxAttempts was 1, justified as "not a nag". Wrong reading: "not a nag" is about
interrupting unprompted, and a clarifying question is part of a conversation he
started. Now three, configurable via voice.clarify_max_attempts (default 3).
Three, because after that the likely problem is she misheard the whole request,
not one slot.
Answer used to keep the parked value, so "в три" then "нет, в пять" threw the
five away. Now a value the answer carries wins for the slot she asked about.
Only for the clarify answer — a correction in a fresh turn is followUpMerge.
The eight-field chained assertion in the Answer test is one DeepEqual now, so a
new field in Slots is covered without touching the test.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The system prompt showed the JSON contract as {"response": "..."} and the
user prompt repeated it. A 0.8B copies whatever sits in the response slot, so
7 of 15 nudges came back as literally "...".
Changes, all prompt-side — the {"response","mood"} contract is unchanged:
- nudge system prompt is Russian, feminine self-reference, with filled-in
examples on topics that never appear as rules, so copying them is visible
- rule names get a Russian gloss and a required keyword, named last in the
prompt where a small model weights it hardest
- durations render in Russian, not English
- the no-parse fallback says something Russian instead of "water — care",
which was going straight to a Russian piper voice
- same "..." placeholder removed from replier_llm.go
Scored on internal/phraser/eval: 0/15 -> 13/15.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The e5 embedder puts every cosine in one narrow band (0.79-0.89), so the
absolute query_min_score gate cannot tell a real hit from a made-up
question: any value under the band answers everything, any value above it
answers nothing. False recall was 5/5.
New gate asks whether one note is clearly the best instead: top1 - top2 >
delta. New query_min_margin config knob, default 0.008, read off the sweep
in the recall harness. The absolute floor stays as a second check.
On the recall fixture with e5: answered 72% -> 68%, false recall 5/5 -> 1/5.
Vikunja #359
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The two things that made this unsafe are fixed: the router can now
refuse, and slot extraction runs on its decisions.
On the held-out fixture it gets 63.2% of intents right against the
classifier's 50.0%, with no route errors. It costs about a second a
turn instead of 30ms.
The flag is a pointer now, so leaving it out of the config means on
and only writing false turns it off.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
An LLM-routed reminder came back with no parsed time and an act with no
fn, because only the classifier path ran the extractor. Now the router
runs the same extraction after an LLM decision and fills only the empty
slots. No time in the utterance still means no time.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
recall@1 60% to 72%, answered 48% to 72%, latency 3x better. But false
recall went 1/5 to 5/5: e5 packs every score into a narrow high band, so
the 0.55 gate now admits everything. Left the gate alone as instructed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The old model was a symmetric paraphrase model, so it scored "do these
look alike" instead of "does this note answer this question". Also fixes
the file mismatch: the Makefile, the deploy config and both evals now all
name the same quantized file, and the quantized one is what gets measured.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Note recall is asymmetric: a short question goes in, a longer note comes
out. Adds EmbedQuery/EmbedPassage helpers and the e5 prefixes, and points
the note/fact write path at the passage side and the query path at the
query side. Reviewers: the three call sites in voice.go.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Chose an 8th enum value over a confidence number: the model already picks
one enum token, so it costs nothing in the grammar, while a score from a
0.8B model would be uncalibrated noise. A refusal returns "no decision"
with no error, which is the fall-through the caller already uses for a
bad parse, so the classifier and its clarify gate take the turn.
Reviewers: the prompt's counter-examples matter most — a small model will
over-use any easy escape hatch. The training workspace copy of the prompt
still needs the same edit (Vikunja #362).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The earlier before/after was taken while another eval shared
llama-server. This run had the box to itself.
Intent accuracy 61.8% llm-only, 63.2% cascade, 67.1% with thinking off.
The prompt fix holds. note→fact shows up here too, so it is real.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
DESIGN.md has always said `make test` is "gofmt + vet + -race, no
exceptions". It only ever ran the tests, which is how nine files drifted
out of format without anyone noticing.
`test` now depends on `fmt-check` and `vet`. Checked that fmt-check does
fail when a file is unformatted, so the gate is real and not decorative.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Two merge fixes on top of the branch:
- migrations: keep both new steps, snooze stays #8, the routine columns
become #9. Both agents had numbered theirs #8.
- accepting no longer takes a reminder id, on the web surface too. The
web accept path had the same one-shot-reminder bug the voice path did,
so both now just flip the status and let the tick loop schedule.
The test that asserted "accept creates a reminder and links it" asserted
the bug. It now asserts that accepting creates no reminder.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The tick loop now reads accepted routines from the store and nudges when
their interval has passed; accepting no longer builds a one-shot reminder.
Look at routine.DueAccepted for the schedule rule (no catch-up backlog) and
at fireAcceptedRoutines for the restraint gate — routines do not bypass it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Two agents wrote the same three test helpers and names for the same two
bugs. Kept the real assertions from dispatcher_test.go and removed the
skipped placeholders they replace. panicSink stays in durability_test.go
since both files use it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Data layer only. Migration #8 adds accepted_ts and last_fired_ts to
proposed_routines, plus ListAcceptedRoutines and MarkRoutineFired so the
tick loop can own the schedule. Accepting no longer links a reminder id.
Look at the TODO(vikunja#366) in cmd/mavend/tick.go for the next commit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The integration branch names one test TestAwayFallsBackToFullBodyWhenSummaryEmpty,
which describes the old bug; it is here as TestAwaySendsGenericLineWhenSummaryEmpty
and asserts the generic line instead of the body. Also covers: a normal summary
goes out unchanged, voice keeps the full body, and one panicking sink does not
eat the other channel for the same nudge. Reformatted one pre-existing struct.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
A panic in Send used to unwind past completeOutbox and leave the
delivery_attempts row pending forever, since reconciliation only runs at
startup. safeSend turns the panic into an error, logs it loudly, records the
attempt failed, and lets the other channels for the same nudge still go out.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Away channels (ntfy, telegram) leave the box, so an empty Summary now sends
a fixed generic line plus the rule name instead of the full Body. The
dispatcher strips detail before any sink sees it, so a sink added later
cannot leak by reading the wrong field. Voice is local and unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Real recall is 48% after the gate, and one must-be-silent query gets an
answer anyway. Review finding 2 (the score distributions overlap, so no
gate separates a real recall from a false one) and finding 4 (the memStore
branch at voice.go:776 is unreachable for notes). Adds an embedder cache
so the gate sweep does not re-embed the fixture nine times.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The Gatherer now fills State.SnoozeUntil from store.SnoozedUntil instead
of nil, so a snooze finally reaches the gate. RemindDecisions gains the
one restraint check that applies to a reminder — quiet hours, presence
and cooldown are still bypassed, so "wake me 7" is unchanged. Reviewer:
the two tests in internal/loop/gate_test.go are the contract.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Covers: a reminder with no time is asked about and completes on the answer; the
same for a fact; an answer past the TTL falls through as a fresh utterance; a
second unclear answer drops the request with no second question; a clarified act
off the allowlist neither runs nor gets enabled; a clarified destructive act
still parks a confirm; noise keeps the canned reply. No model, no network.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
On a clarify decision with one identifiable gap she now asks instead of saying
"не поняла", and parks the request. The next utterance is parsed as the answer
with the router's own extractor and the completed decision runs through
applyAction like any other — so a clarified act still needs the allowlist and
still hits the destructive confirm gate. An answer that does not fill the gap
drops the request; she never asks twice. Also pulls the session-store block
that HandlePushToTalk and handleText both had into rememberTurn, since the
clarify path needed a third copy.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
A table per intent (reminder needs a time, fact needs a key, act needs a fn)
plus one fixed Russian question per slot. Templates, not model output: a 0.8B
would wander and a question that rewords itself is harder to answer. Note,
query, chat and system get no question — for those a clarify decision keeps
the canned reply rather than inventing a question for noise.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
kami