Measured on the box: "глаголы в прошедшем времени с окончанием -ла",
copied from the query prompt where it fixes her gender, was read by the
resident model as an instruction to use the past tense throughout. She
answered "я вела заметки" and "если ты разрешил, я управляла домом",
which makes a live capability sound finished.
The gender rule stays, without the example.
Two defects found probing the new source on the box.
"кто ты" was answered from one of his notes. The self source sat below
memory and notes, which match by proximity and have no idea the subject
is her. It belongs above all three: a question about her has no answer
in his data either.
And PhraseQuery opens every answer with "вот что я нашла: ", which is
deliberate — it marks the answer as a lookup. Her own description is the
one subject she did not look up, so this is PhraseSelf instead, same
read-only discipline and its own opener. The Stub reads the description
out as it stands, which needs no fallback: it is already her voice.
"что ты умеешь" reached the personal boundary, which claimed it as his
and said "не знаю — не нашла у тебя такой записи" about her own
description. Letting it past would be no better: SearXNG answers about
somebody else's assistant.
A self query source above the boundary, reading one frozen description.
It is NOT a note — notes are his, and a note about her would come back
for "что я записал", would be fed to the digestion worker as something
he said, and would be recalled by proximity for questions that are not
about her.
The description names only what this box does. Everything that depends
on config — the house, the LAN, the feeds, the list, weather, telegram —
is named as depending on what he allowed, and a test pins that split:
inventing a capability here is the same defect as inventing a fact.
topicSelf is scored like every other topic, with a narrow keyword floor
for the no-embedder case. "что ты умеешь" moved off topicOther, where it
had been sitting so an attention question had something to lose to — a
phrasing on two sides never clears the margin. TestONNXTopics 38/38 ->
43/43 on held-out utterances.
Found verifying the three fixes on the box: "кто изобрёл телефон" ran a
LAN scan and answered "нашла 3 устройства". The network seed set opens
with "кто в сети сейчас" and names devices throughout, so a "кто ..."
question about any device noun landed there.
Three topicOther seeds, same shape as the V-553 fix. TestONNXTopics
34/34 -> 38/38 on held-out utterances, and a real scan is still a scan.
Prior turns were joined with newlines and nothing else, so the model got
four unlabelled lines and no way to tell which one was the question. It
answered an earlier one: asked "как дела" after a question about the
telephone, she carried on about the telephone. Four turns live for
fifteen minutes, so the line she answered was often minutes old.
One user message still, because the template constraint that forced the
flattening is real. The turns are labelled as his own earlier words and
the current utterance is named as the one to answer. With no history
the message is the utterance alone, unchanged.
"расскажи про Байкал" was refused as his by 0.0052. Every world seed
opened with an interrogative, so a world question phrased as an order
landed nearer "я тебе рассказывал об этом?" — the same verb about his
own words. Four narrative seeds on the world side.
TestONNXPersonalBoundary 25/25 -> 29/29 on held-out utterances, and the
control "я рассказывал тебе про байкал?" is still his. TestONNXTopics
unchanged at 34/34.
A parked question consumed whatever came next. One act she could not
fulfil ate three turns: "выключи свет в спальне" asked "Что сделать?",
and "кто изобрёл телефон" was scored as an answer to it, then "как
дела" after that. Nothing tested whether the words could be an answer.
The test is two offline token checks that already existed for other
callers: a question shape, or a capture verb. It fires only where the
answer filled nothing, so an answer that closes the gap still lands
whatever shape it has, and the retry budget is untouched — the count
was never the problem.
The topic seeds let "какой сегодня праздник" and "что интересного
произошло сегодня в мире" past the weather source, and the personal
boundary refused them one source further down: "не знаю — не нашла у
тебя такой записи" about a public holiday.
Same defect, same mechanism, one layer lower. "что у меня сегодня" is a
personal seed and worldSeeds had nothing in that frame. Two seeds fix it.
TestONNXPersonalBoundary 22/22 -> 25/25, nothing regressed.
Two recognisers claimed world questions naming a day, both by the same
mechanism and neither by its keyword floor.
topics: weather was the only topic whose seeds carry a day word, four of
eight. So every "какой сегодня X" landed nearest it. "какой сегодня
курс доллара" cleared the margin by 0.0220 and "какой сегодня
праздник" by 0.0398, against 0.0883 for a real weather question, and the
gate asked "для какого города?" about the dollar.
The margin was not the knob: 0.0398 is not a coin flip, and raising the
bar far enough would take real weather with it. topicOther was missing
the negative class. Six seeds, four naming a day and two carrying the
"какой сегодня X" frame itself — a frame both topics use has to sit on
both sides, or the side that owns it wins every noun it has never seen.
personal boundary: the same shape one layer down. "что у меня сегодня"
and "когда моя встреча" put "when does a thing happen" on the
personal side and no world seed answered it, so "во сколько закат
сегодня" was refused as his. Three world seeds, each carrying сегодня,
which is the half of the frame that does the pulling — without it they
caught nothing.
Measured, both opt-in against the ONNX embedder homesrv runs:
TestONNXTopics 27/27 -> 34/34 (7 new cases, none regressed)
TestONNXPersonalBoundary 19/19 -> 22/22 (3 new cases, none regressed)
The control matters as much as the fix: "во сколько у меня встреча" is
the same frame about something that IS his, and it holds at +0.0842,
unchanged from before the seeds moved.
Replaces a test whose name promised more than its body checked: it
looped the grammars asserting Pattern != nil, which regexp.MustCompile
already guarantees at init. Asserting the grammars pass IsAgendaQuestion
would be true by construction, since the first arm is that same loop.
A hand-written example per grammar name catches what neither does: a
grammar edited until it no longer matches the case its comment gives,
and a new grammar nobody wrote an example for.
queryCalendar matched on a day word and stepped aside only on weather
wording. Every world question naming a day was claimed by it and answered
with an empty schedule: "какой сегодня курс доллара" replied "на
05.08.2026 ничего нет", which reads as an answer about a subject she
never looked at. All four probe utterances have an answer in search, and
search sits below the calendar.
V-474 fixed one instance of the class. Sunset, holidays, exchange rates
and world news are the same class and weather wording does not cover them.
router.IsAgendaQuestion is the narrowing. Its first arm reuses
AgendaQueryGrammars, so the rule that routes a question to the query
chain and the rule that lets the calendar answer it cannot drift. The
second reads a scheduled-thing noun, wider than the grammars because
"какие встречи завтра" carries no possessive. The third claims a
question that names no subject of its own.
A continuation is exempt: "а завтра?" cannot name an agenda, and this
is the only date-aware source there is.
Item 2 was blocked because the resident llama-server binds --port 0 inside the
container, so no host process can reach it. Cleared by taking the first of the
three ways out the task listed: a second llama-server on the same gguf, on a
fixed host port.
Cascade + resident model scores 75.8% full and 80.2% intent-only at p50 1.19s
and p95 1.65s, on the fixture as it now stands at 91 cases. That is a new
baseline rather than a movement: 14 cases were added since the 77-case number
in CLAUDE.md.
The model alone scores 37.4% full against 61.5% intent-only. The gap is slots,
not routing. Every reminder case leaves the time to the daemon, which is what
the contract asks of it, and the cascade fills them.
Item 3: the ~6s figure recorded in the task was one sample through the whole
of POST /api/chat, not the router, and is not comparable.
Item 4 is still not run. Killing the resident llama-server needs a permission
this session does not have, and it now has a second half anyway, since with the
workstation up only killing both proves the classifier answers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SoL7EBdYC5Mhz3DJd49GJy
At 21:12 "напомни мне завтра в семь позвонить маме" confirmed a reminder for
21:12 tomorrow. The hour was dropped and the wall clock carried onto the named
day. She did not ask; she named a time nobody gave her, on a path that fires.
A bare "напомни в семь" declines correctly, so adding "завтра" turned a decline
into an invented answer.
dateparser only reads a bare hour when it carries a qualifier or a colon.
"завтра в 7" keeps the current clock and "завтра в 7 часов" is read as seven
hours from now, which moves the day as well. English "at 7" fails identically,
so this is not a Russian defect and both prepositions are rewritten.
The script now gives it the colon: "в 7", "в 7 часов" and "at 7" become
"в 07:00" beside the existing утра/вечера rewrites. A duration is untouched,
because "через 2 часа" has no preposition to match, and so are "в 7:30",
"в 30 минут" and "в 2026 году".
The stub parser has always read the token after the day word, so the floor was
right and the production parser was not. No test on the stub could have caught
this. The four new cases are in TestPythonDateParser, which runs where
dateparser is installed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SoL7EBdYC5Mhz3DJd49GJy
V-405 measured reach with the classifier only, and the LLM router is the
deployed default, so 16/30 was the floor rather than the shipped behaviour.
TestReachWithLLMRouter scores the same 30 cases with the model, gated on
MAVEN_LLM_URL like TestLLMRouterBaseline.
The open question was whether the model writes a literal Praxis capability
into the fn slot and reaches a service the classifier structurally cannot. It
does not. Praxis is 0/12 with the model alone, exactly what the classifier
alone scores, and all twelve fail the same way: local, empty fn. Nothing in the
router prompt names a Praxis capability, so there is no string for it to write.
So V-516's stage-0 grammars are the only path to Praxis, not a determinism
argument. Through the cascade the model scores 28/30 with praxis 11/12, one
point above the classifier baseline. Hexis is 10/10 either way.
Overreach is 1 in both configurations, under the 4 the harness asserts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SoL7EBdYC5Mhz3DJd49GJy
"что ты записала сегодня?" was recognised as a history question and then
answered with "ты говорил: …". The rows are right — a tapped fact is one act
seen from two sides — but the sentence hands the question back instead of
answering it.
historyAsks returns which side was asked and queryHistory phrases from it,
including the nothing-found reply. His side is tested first, because "отмечать"
is on both verb lists and "что я отметил" is not a question about her.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SoL7EBdYC5Mhz3DJd49GJy
V-494 part 1. Store.Wipe drops every table and rebuilds from the migrations;
mavend -wipe is a dry run and -confirm-wipe deletes. QA isolation and
onboarding are the remaining two thirds.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SoL7EBdYC5Mhz3DJd49GJy
There was no documented way to repair a poisoned box. Two invented facts
written during QA disabled world answering for every later turn (V-470), and
revert voids the SQL row while leaving the vector behind (V-493). This is the
operation that undoes both.
Store.Wipe drops every table sqlite_master reports and rebuilds from schema.sql
plus the migrations, rather than deleting from a hand-written list. A list has
to be edited whenever a table is added, and the once it is not, the wipe leaves
personal data behind while reporting success. It vacuums afterwards, because
free pages still hold readable text.
mavend -wipe prints every table and its row count and exits. That alone is a
dry run and answers what a QA session actually asks: what is on this box. It
deletes only with -confirm-wipe. Two flags, because the destructive reading of
one flag is the reading a mistyped command gets.
Nothing outside the database moves. Config, models, passkeys.json and the
encryption key are files.
QA isolation and onboarding are the other two thirds of V-494 and are not here.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SoL7EBdYC5Mhz3DJd49GJy
The candidate row is now an intake form, not a button. Confirming asks for a
definition of done and refuses without one, takes an optional blocked-on name,
and carries the date and the importance through.
The blocked-on is a name in the form and a canonical nexus id in the store.
promoteCandidate resolves it over the new ipc.ResolveEntity seam and stops the
confirmation on an ambiguous or unplaceable name rather than picking.
A date set here books a reminder for 09:00 that morning. That is the only
unprompted delivery the persona allows, because the owner set the date himself.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SoL7EBdYC5Mhz3DJd49GJy
blocked_on stores a canonical entity id, so the form that fills it needs a way
to turn "Kate" into one. ipc.ResolveEntity is that seam: the store adapter
refuses it, because identity is not the store's to answer, and the daemon
overrides it with the Nexus client the voice path already holds.
Three outcomes are kept apart, because a caller deciding whether to store an
id has to tell them apart. No nexus block is ErrNotImplemented. A miss is
ErrNoEntity. Several matches come back Ambiguous with the names, and the
caller asks — picking one is how a task ends up blocked on the wrong person
with nobody able to see it happened.
An outage stays the transport error. "There is no such person" and "Nexus is
down" must not read the same.
The open list carries the text, the date and the importance as an inline form
with a save button. The status is not in it: that ladder is one-way and has
its own two buttons.
The step-up gate was re-argued rather than inherited, which is what the task
asked for, and edit stays ungated. It rewrites a line on a list he reads
himself, the same blast radius drop already has here, and the store refuses
the two edits that would cost something. A collision is named ("another open
task already says this"), not merged.
A weight outside the three rungs keeps its own option in the select, or
saving an unrelated edit would silently reset it to normal.
SetTaskStatus was the only mutation on a task row, so a typo in a dictated
task was permanent and a deadline could not move. EditTask rewrites the three
fields capture set — text, due date and weight — and nothing else. Status
stays the one-way ladder SetTaskStatus owns.
Two things the task asked to settle.
A text edit re-normalises the dedupe key and can collide with another live
row. That is ErrTaskDuplicate, a refusal rather than a merge: two live rows
carry two provenances, two capture times and possibly two external
identities, and merging picks a winner for all three with nobody asked. The
surface names the row that holds the text.
A resolved task is refused outright (ErrTaskResolved). Its text is the record
of what was finished, and rewriting it rewrites history.
due nil clears the date, because clearing has to be sayable — an absent date
and "remove the date" cannot be one argument.
The four schemas are deferred, so a session that looks them up on first use
spends four round trips on tools it always needs. One ToolSearch line at the
start covers them.
Also records the update_task quirk: a call carrying a description resets done
to false, so closing a task with a write-up takes two calls.
The third person here leaked into answers addressed to him, where it reads as
talking about the person reading the reply. Six lines now say "the owner".
"you" is not available in this file: CLAUDE.md addresses the agent, so "you"
there means the agent.
One "him" stays, in the persona block. That line states that Maven must never
say "он"/"его" about the owner, which is a fact about required Russian output
rather than a reference.
Migration #22 adds done_when and blocked_on to tasks, both NOT NULL DEFAULT
''. "He has not written one" and "there is nothing to write" are the same
state here, so no caller has to tell NULL from empty.
blocked_on is a canonical Nexus entity id, never a name. It names a person
and identity lives in Nexus, so free text here would be a second answer to a
question Nexus already owns. The caller resolves before it writes.
Both columns round-trip through ipc.TaskAPI: on ipc.Task, settable at intake
through CaptureTaskReq, and writable afterwards through the new
SetTaskFields, which is deliberately not one-way — he may sharpen a
criterion, and a blocker clears when the person answers.
SetTaskStatus now refuses candidate → open when done_when is empty
(ErrTaskNoDoneWhen, mapped across the wire), the same refusal
ParseTaskCapture makes for a capture marker with nothing after it: confirming
work whose finish line nobody wrote is how a board fills with rows that can
never leave it. Dropping such a candidate stays legal, and the /tasks confirm
button now says what is missing instead of surfacing a not-found.
One caller skips the gate. CaptureTask promoting a candidate he stated out
loud would otherwise be denied intake rather than asked for a criterion, and
a direct open capture never carried one either. The gate belongs to the
deliberate promotion on /tasks, where V-511 puts a form.
Step 5 of the board build. internal/tasks/stall.go counts three shapes —
overdue, sitting longer than StallDays, waiting for confirmation — and states
nothing about what any of them means. That is the line
internal/memory/behavior.go already drew for habits, and the reason is the
same: a 1.7B asked to judge will agree fluently and launder a guess into a
decision. A test asserts the wording carries no assessment.
Sitting is measured from created_ts, the only clock a live row carries: the
store stamps resolved_ts and nothing else. So "no state change in eleven days"
is exactly "captured eleven days ago and still live", which is narrower than
the plan's wording and is the claim the data supports. A candidate is never
counted as overdue, because its due date is Maven's reading of a mail rather
than a deadline he set.
Not a nag. No tick rule reads the counts; they go on /tasks and into the list
reply when he asks, and tickLoop.dayPlan still does not read tasks at all. The
empty case renders as nothing: "ничего не залежалось" appended to every list
read is a nag with a friendly face.
Three say entries, so the page and the spoken list cannot word it differently.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SoL7EBdYC5Mhz3DJd49GJy
The other half of the stage-0 rule. actionAct intercepts task_status ahead of
both ecosystem clients, because the board is Maven's own store and reaching a
capability registry would answer a question about his task list with a gap.
Three answers besides the move, and none of them guesses. No match says so.
More than one match asks which, since closing the wrong task marks work he
never finished as done. No task named asks which too, because the router claims
the turn without the referent and the list lives here.
Matching is normalised containment either direction, over the same
store.NormalizeTaskText key capture dedupes on — he shortens what he said as
often as he pads it. Deliberately not fuzzy: a ranked best guess always returns
exactly one answer, and the one thing this has to be able to say is that it is
not sure.
A candidate he says is done takes both legal store moves. The store refuses
candidate → done, and saying it out loud IS the confirmation the candidate was
waiting for.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SoL7EBdYC5Mhz3DJd49GJy
Step 4 of the board build (docs/plans/15-board-surface.md). Naming a task
instead of its position reached nothing: "закрой задачу купить молоко" routed
act, found no allowlisted fn, and the gate asked "Что сделать?". The position
path already worked through resolveCandidate, but only in the two turns after
she read the list out.
TaskStatusGrammar is the same shape TaskCaptureGrammar uses — matches broadly,
decides in Build, no eighth intent — and fills the fn slot with task_status,
which is neither a Hexis capability nor a Praxis one. Three conditions, all
required: the board noun, so no ordinary sentence claims a turn; exactly one
status class, since "готово, убери" names two and asking beats picking; and a
status word matched as an imperative exactly or a stative by lemma. So a bare
"готово" and a bare "закрой" are not this rule's, and the second belongs to
Praxis, which claims it already.
Two lexicon sets rather than one with a value. The store records which of the
two transitions happened and /tasks shows it: work he chose to stop is not work
he did.
Measured on the fixture, two new cases (ru-act-020, ru-act-021). Classifier +
ONNX 62/89 (69.7%) → 64/91 (70.3%); cascade+llm 67/89 (75.3%) → 69/91 (75.8%,
80.2% intent-only) at p50 1.225s. Both new cases claimed at stage 0, no case
regressed, clarify counts unchanged at 3 false / 1 missed.
The task's own warning stands: every such grammar runs its parser ahead of the
resident model on every turn, so this is the last one that is free.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SoL7EBdYC5Mhz3DJd49GJy
The subjectless-reminder gate has been dead since V-383. It tested
`d.Slots.Text == ""`, and that slot is never empty: fillSlots hands it the
utterance when the model names nothing narrower. Measured on the box on
05-08-2026 — "напомни" alone routed to IntentReminder with Text:напомни,
reached actionReminder, and answered "не получилось разобрать время
напоминания." A parse error for a request he never finished asking about.
"ну напомни же" did the same.
The test is now what the slot CONTAINS. reminderHasSubject discounts the
reminder verb by lemma and the filler particles, and asks whether anything
is left. A day or an hour counts as a subject, which is why this does not
reuse cmd/mavend/reminderbody.go — that one strips the time words too.
filler_particles is the lexicon's 16th set. Not a stopword list: every word
in it is one that cannot BE a reminder's subject.
Measured against the 87-case fixture with and without the change: 65/87
both ways, identical clarify counts, because no case exercised the shape.
So amb-007 "напомни" and amb-008 "ну напомни же" were added, both
want_clarify. At 89 cases the cascade scores 67/89 (75.3% full, 79.8%
intent-only), 3 false clarifies / 1 missed, p50 1.199s — the two new cases
clarify, and nothing else moved. The classifier path still guesses both
(62/89, 8 missed clarify); the gate is on the LLM arm only.
The box needs a rebuild for this to take effect.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SoL7EBdYC5Mhz3DJd49GJy
Item 4. actionChat calls h.phraser.PhraseChat, and LLMPhraser posts raw
HTTP to /v1/chat/completions rather than going through the llm client
scriptedLLM stands in for. The simulator wired phraser.NewStub() anyway,
so no scenario could assert what she says on a chat turn: every reply came
back as a pick from fallbacks_ru_v1.json, four variants deep, and the same
scenario returned "тут я пас." one run and "не знаю, честно." the next.
scriptedPhraser embeds the Stub and overrides PhraseChat only, reading the
same script entries the router reads. A reply is accepted in either shape
the phrasing contract allows, the {"response","mood"} object or plain text,
so a scenario writes one thing for both paths.
An unscripted chat turn returns an error rather than a fallback, matching
scriptedLLM: actionChat logs it and uses ChatFallback(), so scenarios that
never meant to assert a chat reply behave as before.
conversation_anaphora turn 4 now pins its text — the reply that asks which
device he means, which is the recorded defect in the box's own words.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Five Russian turns, one monitor, four questions that say "он" and never
name it again. Item 3 of the task: the shape had nowhere to fail, because
the routing fixture scores one utterance at a time and a conversation that
breaks on turn 2 cannot lose a point there.
Routes are scripted exactly as the box produced them on 05-08-2026. Turn 1
files a fact despite "давай поболтаем", the questions go to query, turn 4
goes to chat, and none of the five replies names the monitor. Four steps
assert the reply LACKS "монитор" and are marked WRONG in their notes with
what each must become.
The absence assertion is forced, not chosen. The simulator wires
phraser.NewStub(), and PhraseChat posts raw HTTP to /v1/chat/completions
rather than through the llm client the harness scripts, so a chat reply
cannot be scripted at all. The wrong replies come from
fallbacks_ru_v1.json, which picks between four variants per turn, so
asserting a string would pin the picker. Missing referent holds whichever
variant she reaches for.
Items 1 and 2 stay open: they are owner decisions about which store a
referent comes from and whether "давай поболтаем" claims a turn.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
turnIsAbout scored t.vec, and t.vec was set in one place: queryEmbed, the
source at actions_query.go:125. Every topic source sits above it — attention,
list, feeds, home, network, weather. So best was handed an empty slice on every
deployed turn, returned ok=false, and all six recognisers ran on their keyword
floors. The seeds have decided nothing outside the tests since the mechanism
landed.
TestONNXTopics passes because it embeds each utterance itself and calls best
directly. That is the shape that hid this for a month: it measures the scorer
and never the wiring. Found on the box instead — "что мне нужно купить" was
answered from an old note about a monitor, and the seeds place it as the list by
0.0841.
turnVector computes the vector on first ask and caches it on the turn;
queryEmbed returns early when it is already set. Chosen over moving the embed
source up the list, because the cost is then paid only by turns that ask a
topic source, and the order of querySources keeps meaning what its comments
argue for.
One scenario assertion moved, and it is a behaviour change rather than a bent
test. morning_missed step 5 pinned "не знаю" for "что я пропустил?" with an
unresolved Praxis item on the board. isAttentionQuery does not match that
phrasing and the topicAttend seeds carry "что важное я пропустил" almost
verbatim, so she reads the item back now. Reading a surfaced item aloud is not
inventing a morning summary, so the floor that step exists for still holds;
what moved is which source answers.
claude